Literature DB >> 27323797

From bedside to bench: the missing brick for patients with fungal sepsis.

Vincenzo Russotto1, Andrea Cortegiani2, Santi Maurizio Raineri2, Antonino Giarratano2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27323797      PMCID: PMC4915051          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1378-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
We read with great interest the article by Spec et al. [1] investigating the immunophenotype of T cells from patients with Candida spp. sepsis. This is the first observational study describing the altered immune response of patients with candidemia. The authors included non-neutropenic critically ill patients with candidemia and non-septic controls, and excluded patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, who had undergone solid or bone marrow transplantation or with other known causes of impaired immune response. The authors hypothesized that their findings may help explain why patients with fungal sepsis show a high mortality despite appropriate antifungal therapy. In our opinion, the observed T-cell exhaustion associated with candidemia may also contribute to explain the paradox of the evidence published recently about invasive fungal infection (IFI) prevention [2]. From our recently published Cochrane review [3], the use of antifungals in critically ill patients as untargeted treatment was not associated with any survival benefit despite being associated with a 45 % reduction of IFIs. When prophylactic and empiric antifungal treatments were investigated in sub-analyses, a reduction of IFIs was observed only after prophylactic administration of antifungals. We hypothesized that studies investigating empiric treatment, defined as the administration of antifungals in patients with signs/symptoms of infections at risk for IFIs, included patients with a more advanced disease process, leading to lack of any survival benefit from antifungals. We now may also speculate that poor survival of patients despite untargeted antifungal drugs may depend on their immune status. Patients treated with empiric antifungals may show an impaired immune response, which may play a causative role for reduced survival or may represent a marker of advanced disease process. Implications for future research may include potential additional mechanisms of impaired immunological function to fill the gap between bedside data and pre-clinical findings.

Abbreviation

IFI, invasive fungal infection
  3 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal agents for preventing fungal infections in non-neutropenic critically ill patients.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Vincenzo Russotto; Alessandra Maggiore; Massimo Attanasio; Alessandro R Naro; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Antonino Giarratano
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-16

2.  T cells from patients with Candida sepsis display a suppressive immunophenotype.

Authors:  Andrej Spec; Yuichiro Shindo; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Strother Wilson; Enyo A Ablordeppey; Evan R Beiter; Katherine Chang; Anne M Drewry; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  The paradox of the evidence about invasive fungal infection prevention.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Vincenzo Russotto; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Antonino Giarratano
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Dying with or Because of Invasive Fungal Infection? The Role of Immunity Exhaustion on Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Vincenzo Russotto; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Cesare Gregoretti; Antonino Giarratano
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Biomarkers to delineate bacteremia from candidemia remain a challenging issue.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Christina David; Rachid Attou; Sebastien Redant; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.