Dragana Nešić1, Yixiao Zhang2, Aleksandar Spasic3, Jihong Li1, Davide Provasi3, Marta Filizola3, Thomas Walz2, Barry S Coller1. 1. From the Allen and Frances Adler Laboratory of Blood and Vascular Biology (D.N., J.L., B.S.C.), Rockefeller University, NY. 2. Laboratory of Molecular Electron Microscopy (Y.Z., T.W.), Rockefeller University, NY. 3. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY (A.S., D.P., M.F.).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The αIIbβ3 antagonist antiplatelet drug abciximab is the chimeric antigen-binding fragment comprising the variable regions of murine monoclonal antibody 7E3 and the constant domains of human IgG1 and light chain κ. Previous mutagenesis studies suggested that abciximab binds to the β3 C177-C184 specificity-determining loop (SDL) and Trp129 on the adjacent β1-α1 helix. These studies could not, however, assess whether 7E3 or abciximab prevents fibrinogen binding by steric interference, disruption of either the αIIbβ3-binding pocket for fibrinogen or the β3 SDL (which is not part of the binding pocket but affects fibrinogen binding), or some combination of these effects. To address this gap, we used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure of the αIIbβ3-abciximab complex at 2.8 Å resolution. Approach and Results: The interacting surface of abciximab is comprised of residues from all 3 complementarity-determining regions of both the light and heavy chains, with high representation of aromatic residues. Binding is primarily to the β3 SDL and neighboring residues, the β1-α1 helix, and β3 residues Ser211, Val212 and Met335. Unexpectedly, the structure also indicated several interactions with αIIb. As judged by the cryo-electron microscopy model, molecular-dynamics simulations, and mutagenesis, the binding of abciximab does not appear to rely on the interaction with the αIIb residues and does not result in disruption of the fibrinogen-binding pocket; it does, however, compress and reduce the flexibility of the SDL. CONCLUSIONS: We deduce that abciximab prevents ligand binding by steric interference, with a potential contribution via displacement of the SDL and limitation of the flexibility of the SDL residues.
OBJECTIVE: The αIIbβ3 antagonist antiplatelet drug abciximab is the chimeric antigen-binding fragment comprising the variable regions of murine monoclonal antibody 7E3 and the constant domains of human IgG1 and light chain κ. Previous mutagenesis studies suggested that abciximab binds to the β3 C177-C184 specificity-determining loop (SDL) and Trp129 on the adjacent β1-α1 helix. These studies could not, however, assess whether 7E3 or abciximab prevents fibrinogen binding by steric interference, disruption of either the αIIbβ3-binding pocket for fibrinogen or the β3 SDL (which is not part of the binding pocket but affects fibrinogen binding), or some combination of these effects. To address this gap, we used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure of the αIIbβ3-abciximab complex at 2.8 Å resolution. Approach and Results: The interacting surface of abciximab is comprised of residues from all 3 complementarity-determining regions of both the light and heavy chains, with high representation of aromatic residues. Binding is primarily to the β3 SDL and neighboring residues, the β1-α1 helix, and β3 residues Ser211, Val212 and Met335. Unexpectedly, the structure also indicated several interactions with αIIb. As judged by the cryo-electron microscopy model, molecular-dynamics simulations, and mutagenesis, the binding of abciximab does not appear to rely on the interaction with the αIIb residues and does not result in disruption of the fibrinogen-binding pocket; it does, however, compress and reduce the flexibility of the SDL. CONCLUSIONS: We deduce that abciximab prevents ligand binding by steric interference, with a potential contribution via displacement of the SDL and limitation of the flexibility of the SDL residues.
Authors: Daisuke Tsuruta; Susan B Hopkinson; Kimberly D Lane; Michael E Werner; Vincent L Cryns; Jonathan C R Jones Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-07-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Andrea Artoni; JiHong Li; Beau Mitchell; Jian Ruan; Junichi Takagi; Timothy A Springer; Deborah L French; Barry S Coller Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johannes F Van Agthoven; Jian-Ping Xiong; José Luis Alonso; Xianliang Rui; Brian D Adair; Simon L Goodman; M Amin Arnaout Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2014-03-23 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Dragana Nešić; Martin Bush; Aleksandar Spasic; Jihong Li; Tetsuji Kamata; Makoto Handa; Marta Filizola; Thomas Walz; Barry S Coller Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-04-13
Authors: Simona Sorrentino; Jose Javier Conesa; Ana Cuervo; Roberto Melero; Bruno Martins; Estrella Fernandez-Gimenez; Federico P de Isidro-Gomez; Jimenez de la Morena; Jan-Dirk Studt; Carlos Oscar S Sorzano; Matthias Eibauer; Jose Maria Carazo; Ohad Medalia Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 11.205