Literature DB >> 31966996

USE OF CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING LEADS TO DIAGNOSIS OF HEMOGLOBIN C TRAIT IN A PATIENT WITH DISCREPANT HEMOGLOBIN A1C AND SELF-MONITORED BLOOD GLUCOSE.

Jordan J Wright, Jiun-Ruey Hu, Zahra Shajani-Yi, Shichun Bao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a useful tool for the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus and generally an excellent marker of overall glycemic control for the preceding 8 to 12 weeks; however, the test is not without its pitfalls. A suspicion of falsely high or low HbA1c should prompt clinicians to evaluate for possible causes. Here, we present the novel use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a case of a 49-year-old African American woman with discrepant HbA1c and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). CGM data suggested that the HbA1c values were falsely elevated, and subsequent evaluation led to a diagnosis of hemoglobin C (HbC) trait.
METHODS: Case identified is described. Point-of-care (POC) and central laboratory HbA1c were measured on the Bayer DCA 2000 and Bio-Rad Variant II Turbo ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography platforms, respectively.
RESULTS: The patient had an elevated POC HbA1c of 10.8% (95 mmol/mol) and a central laboratory HbA1c of 9.2% (77 mmol/mol). The patient's glucose meter measured an average glucose of 138 mg/dL. The Freestyle LibrePro professional CGM was used to investigate the reliability of the patient's SMBG and showed an average glucose of 165 mg/dL. An investigation into potential causes for falsely elevated HbA1c revealed a previously undiagnosed HbC trait.
CONCLUSION: CGM is a valuable tool to assess HbA1c and SMBG discordance and to guide subsequent diabetes management. Our results suggest that the HbA1c may have been overestimated in our patient due to HbC trait; therefore, results must be interpreted with caution.
Copyright © 2019 AACE.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31966996      PMCID: PMC6876969          DOI: 10.4158/ACCR-2018-0149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AACE Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2376-0605


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review of variant hemoglobins interfering with hemoglobin A1c measurement.

Authors:  Randie R Little; William L Roberts
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

2.  Effects of hemoglobin variants on hemoglobin a1c values measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography method.

Authors:  Mercedes Lorenzo-Medina; Silvia De-La-Iglesia; Paloma Ropero; Patricia Nogueira-Salgueiro; Jesus Santana-Benitez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-22

3.  Three of 7 hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet generally accepted analytical performance criteria.

Authors:  Erna Lenters-Westra; Robbert J Slingerland
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Pitfalls in hemoglobin A1c measurement: when results may be misleading.

Authors:  Michael S Radin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Effects of sickle cell trait and hemoglobin C trait on determinations of HbA1c by an immunoassay method.

Authors:  W L Roberts; M McCraw; C B Cook
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Increased plasma malondialdehyde and fructosamine in iron deficiency anemia: effect of treatment.

Authors:  R C Sundaram; N Selvaraj; G Vijayan; Z Bobby; A Hamide; N Rattina Dasse
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 6.529

7.  A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Flash Glucose Monitor FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Arndís F Ólafsdóttir; Stig Attvall; Ulrika Sandgren; Sofia Dahlqvist; Aldina Pivodic; Stanko Skrtic; Elvar Theodorsson; Marcus Lind
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Judith Kuenen; Rikke Borg; Hui Zheng; David Schoenfeld; Robert J Heine
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 19.112

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A View Beyond HbA1c: Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Haleh Chehregosha; Mohammad E Khamseh; Mojtaba Malek; Farhad Hosseinpanah; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.945

2.  Level of Agreement and Correlation Between the Estimated Hemoglobin A1c Results Derived by Continuous or Conventional Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared with the Point-of-Care or Laboratory-Based Measurements: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Samia H Sobki; Abdulghani H Al-Saeed; Wael M Alzahrani; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.595

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.