Literature DB >> 24865164

Three of 7 hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet generally accepted analytical performance criteria.

Erna Lenters-Westra1, Robbert J Slingerland2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2009, we investigated the conformance of 8 hemoglobin A(1c) (Hb A(1c)) point-of-care (POC) instruments. Since then, instruments have improved and new devices are available on the market. In this second study, we evaluated the performance of DCA Vantage, Afinion, InnovaStar, Quo-Lab, Quo-Test, Cobas B101, and B-analyst Hb A(1c) POC instruments.
METHODS: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols EP-5 and EP-9 were applied to investigate imprecision, accuracy, and bias. We assessed bias using the mean of 3 certified secondary reference measurement procedures (SRMPs). Assay conformance with the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) certification criteria was also evaluated. Interference of common Hb variants was investigated for methods that could work with hemolysed material.
RESULTS: The total CVs for all instruments, except for the DCA Vantage at a high Hb A(1c) value, were ≤3.1% in SI units and ≤2.1% in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units. Afinion, DCA Vantage, B-analyst, and Cobas B101 instruments passed the NGSP criteria with 2 different reagent lot numbers. Quo-Test, Quo-Lab, and InnovaStar instruments had a negative bias compared to the mean of the 3 SRMPs and failed NGSP criteria. Most of the common Hb variants did not interfere with the investigated instruments, except Hb AE for the Cobas B101.
CONCLUSIONS: Afinion, DCA Vantage, Cobas B101, and B-analyst instruments met the generally accepted performance criteria for Hb A(1c). Quo-Test, Quo-Lab, and InnovaStar met the criteria for precision but not for bias. Proficiency testing should be mandated for users of Hb A1c POC assays to ensure quality.
© 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865164     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.224311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  38 in total

1.  A Time-Friendly, Feasible Measure of Nutrition Knowledge in Type 1 Diabetes: The Electronic Nutrition and Carbohydrate Counting Quiz (eNCQ).

Authors:  Arwen M Marker; Amy E Noser; Nicole Knecht; Mark A Clements; Susana R Patton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Parental depression and diabetes-specific distress after the onset of type 1 diabetes in children.

Authors:  Amy E Noser; Hongying Dai; Arwen M Marker; Jennifer K Raymond; Shideh Majidi; Mark A Clements; Kelly R Stanek; Susana R Patton
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Quality of HbA1c Measurement in the Practice: The German Perspective.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Accuracy of a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin A1c Assay.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Amanda Griffin; Francesca M Perez; Erica Basque; Lily Do; Barbara Steiner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-03

5.  Analysis: Investigating the quality of POCT devices for HbA1c, what are our next steps?

Authors:  Erna Lenters-Westra; Emma English
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-21

6.  3D printed auto-mixing chip enables rapid smartphone diagnosis of anemia.

Authors:  Kimberly Plevniak; Matthew Campbell; Timothy Myers; Abby Hodges; Mei He
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Evaluation of Point of Care Analyzer for Hemoglobin A1c.

Authors:  Anne Marie Dupuy; Stéphanie Badiou; Anne Sophie Bargnoux; Jennifer Russelo; Jean Paul Cristol
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-27

8.  Evaluation of Four HbA1c Point-of-Care Devices Using International Quality Targets: Are They Fit for the Purpose?

Authors:  Erna Lenters-Westra; Emma English
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 9.  Impact of HbA1c Testing at Point of Care on Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; J Benjamin Crocker; Jianping Weng
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-27

10.  Selecting a Risk-Based SQC Procedure for a HbA1c Total QC Plan.

Authors:  Sten A Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.