Literature DB >> 31966316

Nest Concealment and Nest Defence by Two Passerines: Effect of Protective Nesting Association.

Marcin Polak1.   

Abstract

Selection of favourable micro-habitat conditions at nest-sites and nest defence can be important anti- predatory strategies in open-cup nesting birds. In response to nest predation risks, some species of birds appear to form protective nesting associations in which both may gain benefits due to mutual warning and nest defence. Despite the many studies assessing the impact of various factors on nest defence and nest placement, how interactions between species while breeding can modify these strategies is still poorly understood. Here I evaluate whether nesting associations in two species influence nest defence intensity and nest-site selection. An observational approach was used to analyse the defensive behaviours of the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio in an agricultural landscape in eastern Poland. Association was determined by the position of the nest with respect to that of the associated species (by the nest of one species being within the breeding territory of the other). Nest defence behaviour of these two passerines was assessed as their response to a human intruder near an active brood. This study showed that the nest size and visibility were similar in nest-sites of pairs nesting in association and in spatial isolation. Barred Warblers nesting within shrike breeding territories strongly defended their nests. Warblers breeding alone displayed a lower level of defence than birds nested in association. Shrikes not nesting with warblers were significantly more aggressive than those breeding in the protective nesting association. I suggest that shrikes tried to compensate for the lack of assistance by warblers in joint nest defence and were forced to invest more into defending their own nests. This research suggests that positive interactions within the heterospecific network of relations in ecosystems may be one of the factors responsible for diversifying the intensity of avian nest defence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antipredator response; Lanius collurio; Nest defence; Positive interaction; Protective nesting association; Sylvia nisoria

Year:  2019        PMID: 31966316      PMCID: PMC6838183          DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2019.58-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zool Stud        ISSN: 1021-5506            Impact factor:   2.058


  5 in total

Review 1.  Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.

Authors:  Steven L Lima
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-08

2.  Social phenotype extended to communities: expanded multilevel social selection analysis reveals fitness consequences of interspecific interactions.

Authors:  Daniela Campobello; James F Hare; Maurizio Sarà
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Erick Greene; Kate Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Tatjana Krama
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sex-specific defence behaviour against brood parasitism in a host with female-only incubation.

Authors:  Milica Pozgayová; Petr Procházka; Marcel Honza
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.