Literature DB >> 31966213

Patterns of Differentiation and Disparity in Cranial Morphology in Rodent Species of the genus Megadontomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae).

Rachel M Vallejo1,2, José Antonio Guerrero3, Francisco X González-Cózatl2.   

Abstract

Rachel M. Vallejo, José Antonio Guerrero, and Francisco X. González-Cózatl (2017) The genus Megadontomys is a Mexican endemic group of rodents with allopatric populations occurring in fragmented patches of cool-humid forest. In this study we used geometric morphometrics methods to assess patterns of morphological variation and differentiation in skull and mandible among and within species of the genus. ANOVA showed that sexual dimorphism was significant for skulls size (P < 0.01) but not for mandibles, and MANOVA indicated that both structures did not differ in shape between sexes. ANOVA reveled a significant di erence among the three species (P < 0.01), M. nelsoni exhibit the largest skull. Canonical variate analyses and Goodall's test found differences in both skulls and mandibles shape among species, being M. cryophilus and M. thomasi the most divergent. The comparison between phylogroups within M. thomasi also revealed significant differences in shape for both structures. Disparity assessment showed that M. thomasi is the species that contributed the most to the overall shape disparity (51.80% for skull and 38.29% for mandible). The permutation test of phylogenetic signal in morphometric data was signi cant for the skull but not for the mandible. Morphometric data support the recognition of three morphotypes whitin the genus. The sister species M. nelsoni and M. thomasi displayed a grater shape similarity in the skull and mandible shape between them. In contrast, M. cryophilus exhibited the greatest shape divergence relative to the other species. The morphological evidence supports the existence of the two different phylogroups within M. thomasi, supporting their recognition as Evolutionary Significant Units previously suggested on molecular data. The lack of phylogenetic signal in the mandible corresponds with the environmental plasticity of this structure as compared with the skull.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparity; Evolutionary history; Geometric morphometrics; Megadontomys; Morphological differentiation

Year:  2017        PMID: 31966213      PMCID: PMC6409441          DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2017.56-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zool Stud        ISSN: 1021-5506            Impact factor:   2.058


  15 in total

1.  Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Antonio Rosas; Markus Bastir
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology.

Authors:  Robert W Scotland; Richard G Olmstead; Jonathan R Bennett
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible?

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg; Katharina Mebus; Jean-Christophe Auffray
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: a multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; S Duttke; S Whelan; Minsung Kim
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Shape at the cross-roads: homoplasy and history in the evolution of the carnivoran skull towards herbivory.

Authors:  B Figueirido; F J Serrano-Alarcón; G J Slater; P Palmqvist
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Hominin homoiology: an assessment of the impact of phenotypic plasticity on phylogenetic analyses of humans and their fossil relatives.

Authors:  Mark Collard; Bernard Wood
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation.

Authors:  C Moritz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  G D Singh; J A McNamara; S Lozanoff
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in musteloids.

Authors:  Santiago A Catalano; Marcos D Ercoli; Francisco J Prevosti
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face.

Authors:  M Collard; P O'Higgins
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.