Literature DB >> 12950630

Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible?

Christian Peter Klingenberg1, Katharina Mebus, Jean-Christophe Auffray.   

Abstract

The mouse mandible has long served as a model system for studying the development and evolution of complex morphological structures. We used the methods of geometric morphometrics to reassess the hypothesis that the mandible consists of two separate modules: an anterior part bearing the teeth and a posterior part with muscle attachment surfaces and articulating with the skull. The analyses particularly focused on covariation of fluctuating asymmetry, because such covariation is due exclusively to direct interactions between the developmental processes that produce the traits of interest, whereas variation of traits among individuals also reflects other factors. The patterns of fluctuating asymmetry and individual variation were only partly consistent, indicating that developmental processes contribute differentially to variation at different levels. The results were in agreement with the hypothesis that the anterior and posterior parts of the mandible are separate develop-mental modules. Comparison of all alternative partitions of the landmarks into two contiguous subsets confirmed the hypothesis for the location of the boundary between modules but also underscored that the separation between them is not complete. Modularity is therefore manifest as the relative independence of parts within the framework of overall integration of the mandible as a whole-it is a matter of degrees, not all or nothing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12950630     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2003.03057.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  68 in total

1.  Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg; Larry J Leamy; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Hedgehog-dependent proliferation drives modular growth during morphogenesis of a dermal bone.

Authors:  Tyler R Huycke; B Frank Eames; Charles B Kimmel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Regeneration of the limb: opinions on the reality.

Authors:  Eugene Yong-Shun See; Mangesh Kulkarni; Abhay Pandit
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The morphology of the mouse masticatory musculature.

Authors:  Hester Baverstock; Nathan S Jeffery; Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  A comparative assessment of mandible shape in a consomic strain panel of the house mouse (Mus musculus)--implications for epistasis and evolvability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Louis Boell; Sona Gregorova; Jiri Forejt; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 6.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

7.  Differences between rodent taxa in fluctuating asymmetry of cranial structures.

Authors:  I A Kshnyasev; E A Gileva; A V Borodin; L E Yalkovskaya; S V Zykov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

8.  Genetics of Skeletal Evolution in Unusually Large Mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Melissa M Gray; Caley A Hogan; Irene N Ford; Karl W Broman; Christopher J Vinyard; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial variation, ontogeny and modularity in a cross-sectional sample of modern humans.

Authors:  H L L Wellens; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; D J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse.

Authors:  Katherine Elizabeth Willmore; Miriam Leah Zelditch; Nathan Young; Andrew Ah-Seng; Scott Lozanoff; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.