Jinghui Hu1, Li Wang2, Wei Zhao1, Yujie Huang1, Zhe Wang1, Heping Shen3. 1. Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China. 2. Department of Gynecology and Οbstetrics, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, P.R. China. 3. Department of Gynecology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, P.R. China.
Ovarian carcinoma is one of the most frequently diagnosed gynecological cancers and is also the fourth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in females (1). Ovarian carcinoma usually causes a high mortality rate due to the high prevalence of cancer metastasis by the time of first diagnosis and the lack of radical treatment for metastatic tumor (2). In addition, the postoperative tumor recurrence rate is also high, leading to the low overall cure rate (3). The occurrence, development and progression of ovarian carcinoma requires the involvement of multiple internal and external factors, such as genetic, reproductive and dietary risk factors (4). However, the molecular mechanism of this disease remains to be further elucidated (5).Rho-associated protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) plays pivotal roles in regulating cytokinesis, smooth muscle contraction and formation of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers (6). A ROCK2 also participate in a number of types of humanmalignancies including ovarian carcinoma (7) and inhibition of ROCK2 may help the treatment of ovarian carcinoma (8). ROCK signaling in some cases interacts with long noncoding (lnc)RNAs to perform their roles (9), which are a group of non-protein-coding transcripts that have essential roles in cancer development (10). mi-R4435-2HG promotes lung cancer (11), while its involvement in other humancancers is unknown. It was demonstrated that mi-R4435-2HG promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis of cancer cells in ovarian carcinoma by upregulating ROCK2.
Materials and methods
Patients, specimens and cell line
A total of 63 patients (females) with ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China) from March 2015 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria: i) Ovarian carcinomapatients diagnosed by pathological examinations; ii) Patients with a complete medical record. Exclusion criteria: i) Other medical disorders were observed; ii) therapies were performed before this study. Tumor tissue and adjacent healthy tissue specimens were obtained from each participant. Age of patients ranged from 38 years to 68 years (51.4±6.3 years). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (12), there were 12, 18, 16 and 17 cases at stage I–IV, respectively. This study passed the review of Ethics Committee of the aforementioned hospital. All patients signed informed consent.Humanovarian carcinoma cell line UWB1.289 from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) and immortalized human ovarian epithelial cell line SV40 from Applied Biological Materials (Richmond, BC, Canada) were used. Cell culture medium was 50% ATCC-formulated RPMI-1640 medium (ATCC) and 50% mammary epithelial growth medium (ATCC) supplemented with 3% of fetal bovine serum (Sangon, Shanghai, China). Cell culture conditions were 37°C and 5% CO2.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
To detect the expression of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2, RNAzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to extract total RNA. Applied Biosystems™ High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit was used to perform reverse transcription (25°C for 5 min, 55°C for 20 min and 75°C for 5 min) and SYBR® Green Quantitative RT-qPCR kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to prepare PCR reaction systems. Reaction conditions were: 95°C for 1 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 sec and 57°C for 50 sec. Primers of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 as well as endogenous control GAPDH were designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to carry out all PCR reaction systems. Primer sequences were: 5′-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3′ (reverse) for 18S rRNA; 5′-GTGTAGGAGAGTCGGCCTTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TTGGGCTGGGATAGTGTCT-3′ (reverse) for mi-R4435-2HG; 5′-TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT3′ (forward) and 5′-CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCCACCACforGAPDH; 5′-GTGTCGGCTCCTCTGATCTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGCATGTCTGGATGACCTCT-3′ (reverse) for ROCK2. Cq values were normalized using 2−∆∆Cq method (13).
Cell transfection
UWB1.289 cells were cultivated overnight to reach 70–80% confluence. Vectors expressing mi-R4435-2HG (accession: NR_015395.2) or ROCK2 as well as empty vectors were designed and constructed by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). ROCK2 small interfering (si)RNA (5′-CAGAAGCGTTGTCTTATGCAA-3′) and negative control siRNA (5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′) were also designed and constructed by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. Vectors (10 nM) or siRNAs (30 nM) were first mixed with lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), followed by incubation with cells for 5 h. Cells with no transfections were control cells (C). Negative control (NC) was empty vector or NC siRNA transfection. Overexpression rates of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 above 200% and ROCK2 knockdown rate below 30% were confirmed by RT-qPCR before subsequent experiments.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to perform cell proliferation assay. Briefly, cells were harvested, and single cell suspensions were prepared. Each well of a 96-well plate was filled with 0.1 ml cell suspension, followed by incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. CCK-8 solution (10 µl) was added 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after the beginning of cell culture. Optical density values at 450 nm were measured after cell culture for an additional 4 h.
Cell apoptosis assay
Briefly, cells were used to make cell suspensions with cell density of 3×104 cells/ml. Each well of a 6-well plate was filled with 10 ml cell suspension. Cells were cultivated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. After that, cells were harvested and subjected to 0.25% trypsin digestion, followed by staining with Annexin V-FITC (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) and propidium iodide for 5 min in the dark at 4°C. After that, a flow cytometer was used detect apoptotic cells. Data were processed using FCS Express 6 Flow Cytometry Software (version 6; De Novo Software, Glendale, CA, USA).
Western-blotting
To detect the expression of ROCK2 at protein level, total protein was extracted using RIPA solution (Genepharma) and protein concentrations were measured using a BCA kit (Genepharma). After protein denature in boiled water for 5 min, all proteins samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE (10% gel) electrophoresis (30 µg per lane), followed by gel transfer to PVDF membrane and blocking in 5% non-fat milk (2 h at room temperature), membranes were further incubated with primary antibodies of ROCK2 (1:1,500; rabbit anti human, cat. no. ab71598; Abcam) and GAPDH (1:1,500; rabbit anti human; cat. no. ab8245; Abcam) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:1,200; cat. no. MBS435036; MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at 24°C for 2 h. Immobilon ECL Ultra Western HRP Substrate (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to develop signals and signals were normalized using Image J software (version 1.48; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate and data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Correlations between mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 mRNA were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Comparisons of expression levels of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 mRNA between two types of tissues were performed by a paired t test. Differences among multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 are upregulated in ovarian carcinoma
Expression of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 in tumor tissues and adjacent healthy tissues of ovarian carcinomapatients were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Compared with healthy tissues, mi-R4435-2HG (Fig. 1A) and ROCK2 (Fig. 1B) were both significantly upregulated in tumor tissues (P<0.05).
Figure 1.
mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 are both upregulated in tumor tissues of patients with ovarian carcinoma patients. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR results analyzed by paired t-test showed that expression levels of (A) mi-R4435-2HG and (B) ROCK2 were both increased in tumor tissues than in adjacent healthy tissues. *P<0.05. mi-R, microRNA; ROCK2, Rho-associated protein kinase 2.
mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 are positively correlated in both tumor and healthy tissues
Correlations between expression levels of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 mRNA were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. As shown in Fig. 2A, expression levels of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 were significantly and positively correlated in tumor tissues (P<0.0001; r=0.87). In addition, expression levels of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 were also significantly and positively correlated in healthy tissues (P<0.0001; Fig. 2B; r=0.85).
Figure 2.
Expression levels of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 are positively correlated in both tumor and healthy tissues. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed that mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 were significantly and positively correlated in (A) tumor tissues and (B) adjacent healthy tissues. mi-R, microRNA; ROCK2, Rho-associated protein kinase 2.
mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediates the upregulation of ROCK2
Overexpression of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 in cells of ovarian carcinoma cell line UWB1.289 were performed to further explore the possible interactions between mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2. Compared with the C and NC groups, mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediated the significant upregulation of ROCK2 at both mRNA and protein levels (P<0.05; Fig. 3A), while overexpression of ROCK2 showed no significant effect on expression of mi-R4435-2HG in UWB1.289 cells (Fig. 3B). In SV40 cells, similarly, mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediated the significant upregulation of ROCK2 at both the mRNA and protein level (P<0.05; Fig. 3C), while overexpression of ROCK2 showed no significant effect on the expression of mi-R4435-2HG (Fig. 3D).
Figure 3.
mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediates the upregulation of ROCK2. (A) Western blotting and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR results analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test showed that mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediated the upregulation of ROCK2 at both the mRNA and protein level, (B) while overexpression of ROCK2 showed no significant effect on expression of mi-R4435-2HG in UWB1.289 cells. (C) In SV40 cells, similarly, mi-R4435-2HG overexpression mediated the upregulation of ROCK2 at both mRNA and protein level. *P<0.05. (D) While overexpression of ROCK2 showed no significant effect on expression of mi-R4435-2HG. *P<0.05. C, control, cells without transfections; NC, negative control, cells transfected with empty vector; mi-R, microRNA; ROCK2, Rho-associated protein kinase 2.
mi-R4435-2HG regulates ovarian carcinoma cell proliferation and apoptosis through ROCK2
Compared with the C and NC groups, overexpression of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 led to significantly promoted proliferation (P<0.05; Fig. 4A) and significantly inhibited apoptosis (P<0.05; Fig. 4B) of cancer cells, while mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 knockdown played an opposite role. In addition, ROCK2 knockdown significantly attenuated the effects of mi-R4435-2HG overexpression on cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis (P<0.05). However, mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 overexpression as well as ROCK2 knockdown failed to affect the behaviors of SV40 cells (data not shown).
Figure 4.
mi-R4435-2HG regulates ovarian carcinoma cell proliferation and apoptosis through ROCK2. Cell proliferation and apoptosis assay showed that overexpression of mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 led to promoted (A) proliferation and inhibited (B) apoptosis of cancer cells, while mi-R4435-2HG and ROCK2 knockdown played an opposite role. In addition, ROCK2 knockdown attenuated the effects of mi-R4435-2HG overexpression on cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. In A, *P<0.05 vs. the control group; #P<0.05 vs. the with mi-R4435-2HG overexpression group. *P<0.05. si, small interfering; mi-R, microRNA; ROCK2, Rho-associated protein kinase 2.
Discussion
The oncogenic function of mi-R4435-2HG has only been reported in lung cancer, while its roles in other human diseases are unknown. The present study first reported, to the best of our knowledge that mi-R4435-2HG was upregulated in ovarian carcinoma and regulates cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. The actions of mi-R4435-2HG in ovarian carcinoma is at least partially achieved through the interactions with ROCK2.ROCK2 overexpression is frequently observed during the development of different types of humancancers (14). It is generally believed that ROCK2 plays an oncogenic role in cancer biology (15). In ovarian carcinoma, ROCK2 promotes cancer cell proliferation and invasion, and inhibition of ROCK2 inhibits cancer development (8). The present study also observed upregulated expression of ROCK2 in ovarian carcinoma tissues compared with in adjacent healthy tissues. In addition, the regulatory role in cancer cell proliferation, the present study showed that ROCK2 can also regulate cancer cell apoptosis. The results of the present study further confirmed the oncogenic role of ROCK2 in ovarian carcinoma.The development and progression of ovarian carcinoma globally affects the expression of lncRNAs (16). Some lncRNAs, such as lncRNA Meg3 and PCGEM1 have been proved to be players in the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma (17,18). The present study, to the best of our knowledge first proved that mi-R4435-2HG plays an oncogenic role in ovarian carcinoma by promoting cancer cell proliferation and inhibiting cancer cell apoptosis. The present study also proved that the regulatory role of mi-R4435-2HG in ovarian carcinoma cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis is likely achieved through its role as an upstream activator of ROCK2. However, the mechanism of the upregulation of ROCK2 by mi-R4435-2HG is still unknown. mi-R4435-2HG promotes ROCK2 at both the mRNA and protein levels. Therefore, mi-R4435-2HG may regulate ROCK2 at a transcription level.It is worth noting that ROCK2 regulates the invasion of ovarian carcinoma cell invasion. However, mi-R4435-2HG failed to significantly affect the migration and invasion of cells of ovarian carcinoma cell line UWB1.289 (data not shown, revealed by Transwell migration and invasion assays). This is possibly due to the specific cell line used in this study. Another explanation is that mi-R4435-2HG may interact with multiple downstream effectors to achieve a fine regulation of cancer cell proliferation and invasion. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that ROCK2 siRNA silencing only partially attenuated the effects of mi-R4435-2HG overexpression on cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. It is worth noting that only one cancer cell line was used in present study. Future studies may include more cell lines to further test the conclusion of this study.In conclusion, mi-R4435-2HG plays an oncogenic role in ovarian carcinoma by promoting cancer cell proliferation and inhibiting cancer cell apoptosis through the upregulation of ROCK2.