| Literature DB >> 31965244 |
Yingzhuang Chen1,2, Lidia Montero1,3, Jiang Luo1,3, Junjie Li1,3, Oliver J Schmitz4,5.
Abstract
The focus of this study was the analysis of the complex chemical composition from different parts of Buddleja davidii, whose species are commonly known as ornamental plants and herbal medicines in many countries. As an herbal medicine, it has been utilized for stroke treatments, headache, wound healing, neurological disorder, etc. However, the understanding of its chemical matrices is still insufficient. Therefore, an online two-dimensional reversed phase liquid chromatography x hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (RPLCxHILIC) system coupled with mass spectrometry was applied for further detailed investigation of the chemical constituents in Buddleja dividii. In this two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) method, a new at-column dilution (ACD) modulator was introduced in the 2D-LC system to solve the incompatibility problem of the mobile phase between two dimensions, which resulted in a 2D-LC analysis with high orthogonality. For the root extract, as one of the analyzed samples, the optimization of the 1D and 2D gradients was carried out carefully. With this new modulator, much better peak separation and better peak shape were achieved compared to two-dimensional liquid chromatography system using a traditional standard (TS) modulator. With a similar approach, the other four parts of Buddleja davidii were well separated. Comparing the different analyzed parts, flowers and leaves showed the most complex profiles. MS and MS/MS data were obtained successfully, which demonstrated the potential of the proposed RPLCxHILIC-MS system in the constituents' analysis of herbal medicine. However, due to the lack of reported reference information, 24 compounds could be tentatively identified.Entities:
Keywords: 2D-LC; At-column dilution (ACD); Buddleja davidii; Herbal medicine; RPLCxHILIC
Year: 2020 PMID: 31965244 PMCID: PMC7026260 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02392-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.142
Fig. 1Configuration of the traditional standard (TS) modulator and at-column dilution (ACD) modulator. In this scheme, a 2-position 8-port switching valve is shown to simplify the visualization of the new configuration
Fig. 2Optimized 2D-LC gradient for 1D and 2D separation
Fig. 3Optimization of the gradient for the 1D RP separation
Fig. 4Optimization of the 2D shift gradient (α, first gradient cycle and β, last gradient cycle in 2D shift gradient). a 2D plot of the root separation using the gradient shown in b (95% of mobile phase B as initial conditions in the 2D gradients). c 2D plot of the root separation using the gradient shown in d (100% of mobile phase B as initial conditions in the 2D gradients). e 2D plot of the root separation using the gradient shown in f (100% of mobile phase B followed by a second step reducing the mobile phase B as initial conditions in the 2D gradients). g 2D plot of the root separation using the gradient shown in h (100% of mobile phase B followed by a second step with a faster reduction of mobile phase B as initial conditions in the 2D gradients)
Fig. 5Contour plots of RPLCxHILIC with ACD modulation or with TS modulation for different parts of Buddleja davidii. Flower with ACD modulation (a), leaf with ACD modulation (b), leaf with TS modulation (c), flower with TS modulation (d), stem with ACD modulation (e), fruit with ACD modulation (f)
MS identification of the constituents found in the RPxHILIC-DAD-QTOF MS analysis of the root sample of Buddleja davidii
| Nr. | Retention time (min) | [M-H]− | Experimental mass | Theoretical mass | Error (ppm) | Chemical formula | Fragments MS/MS | Identification | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.26 | 283.0632 | 284.0710 | 284.0685 | 8.9767 | C16H12O5 | 107, 151, 211, 239, 268 | Acacetin | [ |
| 2 | 12.74 | 329.0883 | 330.0961 | 330.0951 | 3.1506 | C14H17O9 | 108, 152, 197 | Vanillic acid glucoside | [ |
| 3 | 46.59 | 329.2355 | 330.2433 | 139, 171, 211, 226, 292, 319 | |||||
| 4 | 7.9 | 341.1107 | 342.1185 | 342.1162 | 6.7521 | C12H22O11 | 101, 113, 119 | Sucrose | [ |
| 5 | 60.6 | 375.0885 | 376.0974 | 278, 331, 345, 360 | |||||
| 6 | 57.7 | 459.2535 | 460.2613 | C30H35O4 | 125, 152, 181, 199, 277 | Dihydrobuddledin A derivative | |||
| 7 | 9.35 | 461.1688 | 462.1766 | C23H26O10 | 101, 113, 135, 153, 297, 315 | Verbacoside derivate | |||
| 8 | 15.29 | 476.1838 | 477.1916 | 101, 113, 134,160, 175, 193 | |||||
| 9 | 13.55 | 487.1476 | 488.1554 | 488.153 | 4.9779 | C21H28O13 | 135, 161, 179 | Cistanoside F | [ |
| 10 | 27.09 | 497.1736 | 498.1814 | 108, 123, 152, 167 | Vanillic acid derivate | ||||
| 11 | 11.63 | 503.1674 | 504.1752 | 101, 113, 131, 161, 221 | |||||
| 12 | 29.07 | 521.1719 | 522.1797 | 121, 148, 160, 175,193, 341 | |||||
| 13 | 24.84 | 523.1848 | 524.1926 | 134, 160, 175, 193 | |||||
| 14 | 36.77 | 523.1861 | 524.1939 | 134, 160, 175, 193 | |||||
| 15 | 37.07 | 523.1861 | 524.1939 | 134, 160, 175, 193 | |||||
| 16 | 13.54 | 529.1586 | 530.1664 | 113, 133, 161 | |||||
| 17 | 15.21 | 529.1589 | 530.1667 | 113, 133, 161 | |||||
| 18 | 19.17 | 551.2152 | 552.2230 | 101, 167, 220, 235, 311, 326, 356, 371 | |||||
| 19 | 25.04 | 551.2159 | 552.2237 | 101, 167, 220, 235, 311, 326, 356, 371 | |||||
| 20 | 41.26 | 591.1732 | 592.1810 | 592.1792 | 3.065 | C28H32O14 | 284, 268 | Linarin | [ |
| 21 | 27.24 | 623.2008 | 624.2086 | 624.2054 | 5.1265 | C29H36O15 | 113, 135, 161, 461 | Verbascoside/Forsythoside A/Acteoside/Cis-acteoside/Isoacteoside | [ |
| 22 | 23.21 | 623.201 | 624.2088 | 624.2054 | 5.4469 | C29H36O15 | 113, 135, 161, 461 | Verbascoside/Forsythoside A/Acteoside/Cis-acteoside/Isoacteoside | [ |
| 23 | 41.26 | 637.1818 | 638.1896 | 113, 135, 160, 17, 193, 461, 161 | |||||
| 24 | 33.11 | 637.2170 | 638.2248 | 638.2211 | 5.8757 | C30H38O15 | 113, 135, 160, 175, 193, 461, 161 | Jionoside D/Plantainoside C | [ |
| 25 | 35.16 | 637.2178 | 638.2256 | 638.2211 | 7.1292 | C30H38O15 | 113, 135, 160, 175, 193, 461, 161 | Jionoside D/Plantainoside C | [ |
| 26 | 17.35 | 639.1970 | 640.2048 | 640.2003 | 7.0056 | C29H36O16 | 113, 135, 151, 161, 179 | Campneoside II/Isocampneoside II | [ |
| 27 | 39.05 | 651.2340 | 652.2418 | 113, 134, 160, 175 | Isomartynoside/Martynoside)/crocetin mono- gentibiosyl ester | [ | |||
| 28 | 13.84 | 665.2185 | 666.2263 | 101, 113, 143,179, 221, 383 | |||||
| 29 | 17.95 | 665.2223 | 666.2301 | 101, 113, 143,179, 221, 383 | |||||
| 30 | 19.78 | 665.2262 | 666.234 | 101, 113, 143,179, 221, 383 | |||||
| 31 | 9.2 | 671.2388 | 672.2466 | 101, 167, 297, 549, 630, 653 | |||||
| 32 | 51.54 | 675.3616 | 676.3694 | C33H55O14 | 119, 179, 235, 277, 397, 415 | Dihydrobuddledin A derivate | [ | ||
| 33 | 41.1 | 701.2499 | 702.2577 | 193, 279, 294, 323, 341, 353,671 | |||||
| 34 | 37.22 | 719.261 | 720.2688 | 134, 150, 165, 193, 341, 523 | |||||
| 35 | 46.586 | 735.2538 | 736.2616 | 736.2579 | 5.1205 | C35H44O17 | Acetylmartynoside A | [ | |
| 36 | 19.477 | 755.243 | 756.2508 | 756.2477 | 4.1521 | C34H44O19 | 135,161,179, 429, 447, 593 | Forsythoside B/angoroside A/Hebeoside | [ |
| 37 | 27.397 | 769.2594 | 770.2672 | 770.2633 | 5.0502 | C35H46O19 | 135, 161, 175, 193, 447, 575, 593, 607 | Poliumoside | [ |
| 38 | 25.417 | 769.2607 | 770.2685 | 770.2633 | 6.7380 | C35H46O19 | 135, 161, 175, 193, 447, 575, 593, 607 | Poliumoside | [ |
| 39 | 23.437 | 769.2616 | 770.2694 | 770.2633 | 7.9064 | C35H46O19 | 135, 161, 175, 193, 447, 575, 593, 607 | Poliumoside | [ |
| 40 | 29.377 | 783.2739 | 784.2817 | 784.279 | 3.4937 | C36H48O19 | 125, 160, 175, 193, 607 | Angoroside C | [ |
| 41 | 34.97 | 783.2747 | 784.2825 | 784.279 | 4.5137 | C36H48O19 | 125, 160, 175, 193, 607 | Angoroside C | [ |
| 42 | 35.24 | 783.2755 | 784.2833 | 784.279 | 5.5337 | C36H48O19 | 125, 160, 175, 193, 607 | Angoroside C | [ |
| 43 | 17.574 | 785.2532 | 786.2610 | 786.2583 | 3.5294 | C35H46O20 | 161, 179, 383, 461, 623 | Echinacoside | [ |
| 44 | 37.296 | 797.2887 | 798.2965 | 101, 175, 193, 457, 475, 621 | |||||
| 45 | 33.336 | 905.2746 | 906.2824 | 161, 575, 593, 743 |