Literature DB >> 3196512

Hemodynamic effects of a counterpulsation device implanted on the ascending aorta in severe cardiogenic shock.

J N Nanas1, S N Nanas, C E Charitos, D Kontoyiannis, A D Poyiadjis, G Stamatopoulos, A Melkaoui, G Kokollis, S D Moulopoulos.   

Abstract

A valveless, single orifice counterpulsation device (CD) with maximum stroke volume of 100 ml was implanted on the ascending aorta of nine dogs. Its pneumatic driver was gaited by the ECG to provide aortic diastolic augmentation, with a stroke volume of 60-70 ml. In the same animals a 20 ml intraaortic balloon (IAB) was placed into the descending aorta. An attempt was made to evaluate the effectiveness of the CD on severe cardiogenic shock and to compare its hemodynamic effects with those of the IABP. Severe cardiogenic shock was induced by coronary artery ligation, propranolol administration, and fluid infusion and was characterized by a LVEDP of 22.2 +/- 6.4 mmHg, ASP less than 70 mmHg and greater than or equal to 30 mmHg, and a reduction of CI by 71.7%. The CD had a significant beneficial effect in all measured parameters. The LVEDP decreased by a mean of 44.3% (P less than 0.001) below control value, and the AEDP by 60.2% (P less than 0.001). The PADA increased by 108.5% (P less than 0.001), and the CI by 155.8% (P less than 0.004). The IABP did not significantly change any of the hemodynamic variables. In conclusion, the CD has significant salutary hemodynamic effects in severe cardiogenic shock where IABP is ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3196512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO Trans        ISSN: 0889-7190


  5 in total

1.  Superior performance of a paraaortic counterpulsation device compared to the intraaortic balloon pump.

Authors:  John V Terrovitis; Christos E Charitos; Elias J Tsolakis; Paraskevi Dolou; Charalampos N Pierrakos; Kostas X Siafakas; John N Nanas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Development and early testing of a simple subcutaneous counterpulsation device.

Authors:  Steven C Koenig; Paul A Spence; George M Pantalos; Robert D Dowling; Kenneth N Litwak
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  Continuous internal counterpulsation as a bridge to recovery in acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Christos D Kontogiannis; Konstantinos Malliaras; Chris J Kapelios; Jay W Mason; John N Nanas
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

5.  Comparison of effects of extra-thoracic paraaortic counterpulsation to intraaortic balloon pump on circulatory support in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Jie-Min Zhang; Xiao-Cheng Liu; Zhi-Gang Liu; Long Zhao; Li Yang; Tian-Wen Liu; Guo-Wei He
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.