| Literature DB >> 31964684 |
Stephanie Gamez1, Igor Antoshechkin2, Stelia C Mendez-Sanchez1,3, Omar S Akbari4,5.
Abstract
Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are important vectors for a number of human pathogens including the Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses. Capable of displacing Aedes aegypti populations, this mosquito adapts to cooler environments which increases its geographical range and transmission potential. There are limited control strategies for Aedes albopictus mosquitoes which is likely attributed to the lack of comprehensive biological studies on this emerging vector. To fill this void, here using RNAseq we characterized Aedes albopictus mRNA expression profiles at 34 distinct time points throughout development providing the first high-resolution comprehensive view of the developmental transcriptome of this worldwide human disease vector. This enabled us to identify several patterns of shared gene expression among tissues as well as sex-specific expression patterns. To illuminate the similarities and differences with Aedes aegypti, a related human disease vector, we also performed a comparative analysis between the two developmental transcriptomes, identifying life stages where the two species exhibit similar and distinct gene expression patterns. These findings provide insights into the similarities and differences between Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquito biology. In summary, the results generated from this study should form the basis for future investigations on the biology of Aedes albopictus and provide a gold mine resource for the development of transgene-based vector control strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; RNA-seq; Zika; dengue; development; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31964684 PMCID: PMC7056973 DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.401006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 2Soft clustering and principal component analysis on Ae. albopictus genes. (A) Twenty albopictus gene expression profile clusters were identified through soft clustering. Each gene is assigned a line color corresponding to its membership value, with red (1) indicating high association. The developmental groups are indicated by symbols on the x-axis. (B) Principal component analysis shows relationships between the 20 clusters, with thickness of the blue lines between any two clusters reflecting the fraction of genes that are shared. N, the number of genes in each cluster.
Figure 3Orthology analysis of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus samples across corresponding developmental time points. Orthologs were identified by best reciprocal BLAST hit approach and expression values of orthologous genes were determined by aligning RNA-seq reads from the Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus samples to corresponding genomes using STAR (e.g., Ae. aegypti reads were aligned to Ae. aegypti genome) and quantifying them with featureCounts (Materials and Methods). Species-specific expression values of orthologous genes were used for clustering and PCA analyses. (A) Dendrogram and (B) principal component analysis (PCA) on similar life stage sample types in both species. Both clustering analyses agree with each other indicating the close relationships of similar genes among each developmental time point between species. Interestingly, the Ae. albopictus male testes sample clusters distantly from Ae. aegypti testes which may indicate a significant difference between the two species. (C) Heat map of calculated Pearson correlations on samples between species. Ae. albopictus samples are represented on the vertical axis of the heat map while Ae. aegypti samples are represented on the horizontal axis. Life stages are indicated by the similar colored bars for both species.
Figure 1Global dynamics of gene expression. (A) Correlation matrix of all RNA seq timepoints for all known Ae. albopictus genes. (B) Hierarchical clustering heat map of albopictus genes across all developmental stages. FPKM values were log2(x+1) transformed and were scaled to plot the z-scores. (C) Dendrogram of Ae. albopictus samples clustering similar life stages closer together. Plot depicts the close relationship between all developmental samples. (D) PCA clustering of Ae. albopictus samples depicts clustering of life stages who show close similarity. PCA plot is in agreement with clustering dendrogram. Each point is labeled with the “Order” number they are assigned to from Table S1. For A-D, the second testes replicate was not shown. For A-D, the major developmental groups are indicated by color bars and are organized as follows: M (blue, male testes, male carcass), Fc (pink, NBF carcass, and multiple timepoints PBM: 12hr, 24hr, 36hr, 48hr, 60hr, and 72hr), Ov (orange, NBF ovaries, and multiple ovarian timepoints PBM: 12hr, 24hr, 36hr, 48hr, 60hr, and 72hr), D (tan, diapause at multiple timepoints: 0-1wk, 1-2wk, 2-3wk, and 3-4wk), Emb (embryo at multiple timepoints: 0-1 hr, 0-2 hr, 2-4 hr, 4-8 hr, 8-12 hr, 12-16 hr, 16-20 hr, 20-24 hr, 24-28 hr, 28-32 hr, 32-36 hr, 36-40 hr, 40-44 hr, 44-48 hr, 48-52 hr, 52-56 hr, 56-60 hr, 60-64 hr, 64-68 hr, and 68-72 hr embryos), L (gray, larvae 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th instar larvae stages), and P (yellow, pupae, early male and female, and late male and female pupae stages).