| Literature DB >> 31963616 |
Jacopo Mariani1, Chiara Favero1, Michele Carugno1, Laura Pergoli1, Luca Ferrari1, Matteo Bonzini1,2, Andrea Cattaneo3, Angela Cecilia Pesatori1,2, Valentina Bollati1,2.
Abstract
Air pollution exposure has been linked to modifications of both extracellular vesicle (EV) concentration and nasal microbiota structure (NMB), which might act as the respiratory health gatekeeper. This study aimed to assess whether an unbalanced NMB could modify the effect of particulate matter (PM) exposure on plasmatic EV levels. Due to two different NMB taxonomical profiles characterized by a widely different relative abundance of the Moraxella genus, the enrolled population was stratified into Mor- (balanced NMB) and Mor+ (unbalanced NMB) groups (Moraxella genus's cut-off ≤25% and >25%, respectively). EV features were assessed by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and flow-cytometry (FC). Multivariable analyses were applied on EV outcomes to evaluate a possible association between PM10 and PM2.5 and plasmatic EV levels. The Mor- group revealed positive associations between PM levels and plasmatic CD105+ EVs (GMR = 4.39 p = 0.02) as for total EV count (GMR = 1.92 p = 0.02). Conversely, the Mor+ group showed a negative association between exposure and EV outcomes (CD66+ GMR = 0.004 p = 0.01; EpCAM+ GMR = 0.005 p = 0.01). Our findings provide an insight regarding how a balanced NMB may help to counteract PM exposure effects in terms of plasmatic EV concentration. Further research is necessary to understand the relationship between the host and the NMB to disentangle the mechanism exerted by inhaled pollutants in modulating EVs and NMB.Entities:
Keywords: 16S; Moraxella; bacteria; dysbiosis; extracellular vesicles; flow-cytometry; microbiome; nanoparticle tracking analysis; nasal microbiota; particulate matter
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963616 PMCID: PMC7013854 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the study participants in the Mor− and Mor+ groups.
| Characteristics | Mor− | Mor+ |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
| 0.2 [0.04; 0.5] | 90.2 [84.4; 93.8] | |
|
| 48.6 ± 8.5 | 48.4 ± 8.4 |
|
| 13 (43.3%) | 4 (40%) |
|
| 17 (56.7%) | 6 (60%) |
|
| 24.6 ± 3.2 | 24.6 ± 3.4 |
|
| 16 (53.3%) | 5 (50.0%) |
|
| 14 (46.7%) | 5 (50.0%) |
|
| 17 (56.7%) | 8 (80%) |
|
| 10 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
|
| 3 (10%) | 2 (20%) |
|
| 8 (26.7%) | 4 (40%) |
|
| 18 (60%) | 6 (60%) |
|
| 4 (13.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
|
| 14 (46.7%) | 3 (30%) |
|
| 9 (30%) | 3 (30%) |
|
| 4 (13.3%) | 1 (10%) |
|
| 3 (10%) | 3 (30%) |
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median (first quartile–third quartile) if not normally distributed; discrete variables are expressed as counts (%).
Figure 1Principal coordinate analyses (PCoA) plot made using the normalized weighted UniFrac distance metric. Each dot corresponds to a single subject belonging either to Mor− (green dot) or Mor+ (red dot). The variance explained by each axis is given in parentheses. Dissimilarity between group was statistically tested applying the ANOSIM method.
Figure 2Extracellular vesicle (EV) size distribution in the Mor− and Mor+ groups. Panel (A): * Reported geometric means were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and smoking habits. Plots showing for each group (Mor− and Mor+) the distribution of mean vesicle concentrations for each size. Panel (B): vertical bar charts represent FDR and p-value for each size comparison; the red line indicates p-value = 0.05.
Figure 3Association between total EVs and TNF-α. The multivariable linear regression model was adjusted for age, gender, smoking behavior (Never smoker, Former smoker, Current smoker), and BMI.
Figure 4Association between EV outcomes and PM2.5 exposure. Mor+ and Mor− subjects were represented by crosses and circles, respectively. Scatterplots of EV (103/mL PL) vs. PM2.5 (below) levels (µg/m3). Covariate-adjusted geometric mean ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (GMR (95%CI)) in EV estimated per log10-unit increase in PM are shown. Subjects were stratified according to their Moraxella genus relative abundance into the Mor− (≤25%) and Mor+ (>25%) group. Total EV count obtained via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). EV fraction counts performed via flow-cytometry (FC) analysis.