| Literature DB >> 31963128 |
Krzysztof Przybył1, Adamina Duda2, Krzysztof Koszela3, Jerzy Stangierski4, Mariusz Polarczyk5, Łukasz Gierz6.
Abstract
In this paper, the authors used an acoustic wave acting as a disturbance (acoustic vibration), which travelled in all directions on the whole surface of a dried strawberry fruit in its specified area. The area of space in which the acoustic wave occurs is defined as the acoustic field. When the vibrating surface-for example, the surface of the belt-becomes the source, then one can observe the travelling of surface waves. For any shape of the surface of the dried strawberry fruit, the signal of travelling waves takes the form that is imposed by this irregular surface. The aim of this work was to research the effectiveness of recognizing the two trials in the process of convection drying on the basis of the acoustic signal backed up by neural networks. The input variables determined descriptors such as frequency (Hz) and the level of luminosity (dB). During the research, the degree of crispiness relative to the degree of maturity was compared. The results showed that the optimal neural model in respect of the lowest value of the root mean square turned out to be the Multi-Layer Perceptron network with the technique of dropping single fruits into water (data included in the learning data set Z2). The results confirm that the choice of method can have an influence on the effectives of recognizing dried strawberry fruits, and also this can be a basis for creating an effective and fast analysis tool which is capable of analyzing the degree of ripeness of fruits including their crispness in the industrial process of drying fruits.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); acoustic signals; classification; convection drying; strawberry; texture analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963128 PMCID: PMC7014237 DOI: 10.3390/s20020499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Criterion for strawberry evaluation conducted by experts.
| Quality Ratio | 1 Point | 2 Points | 3 Points | 4 Points | 5 Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Looks | Very soft fruit with numerous stewed areas on the surface | Soft fruit with visible stewed areas on the surface | Firm fruit without deformations with light stewed areas on the surface | Firm fruit without deformations, lack of visible stewed areas on the surface | Hard fruit |
| Color | Red, numerous dark red marks | Red with dark red marks | Dark red | Red | Light red |
| Taste | Strongly perceptible alcohol aftertaste | Sweet with detectable alcohol aftertaste | Characteristic of strawberry, intense sweet | Characteristic of strawberry, sweet | Characteristic of strawberry, sweet and sour |
Figure 1Convection drying curve for trials with ripe and over-ripe strawberry fruits in relation to the change in humidity over time.
Figure 2Samples of three acoustic spectra showing the level of sound intensity for dried strawberry fruits representing the ripe and over-ripe classes, with the following methods: (a) splash batch of five fruits, (b) splash batch of one fruit (the fruit lands in a glass filled with water), (c) squash batch with one fruit.
Figure 3Scheme: 1–transport channel for dried strawberry fruit, 2–trapdoor controlling the speed of the uninhibited falling of fruits, 3–capacitor microphone, 4–dried fruit outlet dropping the dried fruit on the conveyor or into the glass filled with water, 5–import of the recorded sound to the PC and creation of the acoustic spectrum, 6–Artificial Neural Network (ANN) learning process with parameters determining the acoustic wave.
Figure 4Graph of the relationship between strength and distance resulting from the texture of dried strawberry fruit and its degree of ripeness, namely ripe and over-ripe.
Network structure created on the basis of the learning sets prepared for dried strawberry fruit. BP: Back-Propagation; CG: conjugate gradient algorithm.
| Name | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model ANN | MLP 2:2-6-1:1 | MLP 2:2-14-1:1 | MLP 2:2-4-1:1 |
| Training error | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.32 |
| Validation error | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.29 |
| Testing error | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.45 |
| Quality of learning | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.85 |
| Quality of validation | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.86 |
| Quality of testing | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.76 |
| Learning cases | 120 | 40 | 40 |
| Training algorithm | BP50, CG134b | BP50, CG19b | BP06 |
The results of validation for the strawberry neural models. MSE: mean square error; RMSE: root mean square error; MAD: mean absolute deviation; MAPE: mean absolute percentage error.
| Name | Model ANN | MSE | RMSE | MAD | MAPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z1 | MLP 2:2-6-1:1 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 20.55 |
| Z2 | MLP 2:2-14-1:1 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 10.39 |
| Z3 | MLP 2:2-4-1:1 | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.71 | 5.57 |
Hardness (N) of the selected strawberry classes obtained with TA–XT2i texture analyzer.
| No. | Ripe Class (N) | Over-Ripe Class (N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.1 | 10.1 |
| 2 | 15.6 | 12.4 |
| 3 | 16 | 9.9 |
| 4 | 13.6 | 8.8 |
| 5 | 18.2 | 7.3 |
| 6 | 15.6 | 7.6 |
| 7 | 12.3 | 9.1 |
| 8 | 15.4 | 8.7 |
| 9 | 12.3 | 8.3 |
| 10 | 15.4 | 6.9 |
| 11 | 17.8 | 7.1 |
| 12 | 12.9 | 7.1 |
| 13 | 14.4 | 10.1 |
| 14 | 14.6 | 7.3 |
| 15 | 12.5 | 8.6 |
| 16 | 14.6 | 6.8 |
| 17 | 18.3 | 6.9 |
| 18 | 14.8 | 10.1 |
| 19 | 12.9 | 10.9 |
| 20 | 14.6 | 9.3 |
|
|
|
|