Literature DB >> 31962174

EEG-based classification of natural sounds reveals specialized responses to speech and music.

Nathaniel J Zuk1, Emily S Teoh2, Edmund C Lalor3.   

Abstract

Humans can easily distinguish many sounds in the environment, but speech and music are uniquely important. Previous studies, mostly using fMRI, have identified separate regions of the brain that respond selectively for speech and music. Yet there is little evidence that brain responses are larger and more temporally precise for human-specific sounds like speech and music compared to other types of sounds, as has been found for responses to species-specific sounds in other animals. We recorded EEG as healthy, adult subjects listened to various types of two-second-long natural sounds. By classifying each sound based on the EEG response, we found that speech, music, and impact sounds were classified better than other natural sounds. But unlike impact sounds, the classification accuracy for speech and music dropped for synthesized sounds that have identical frequency and modulation statistics based on a subcortical model, indicating a selectivity for higher-order features in these sounds. Lastly, the patterns in average power and phase consistency of the two-second EEG responses to each sound replicated the patterns of speech and music selectivity observed with classification accuracy. Together with the classification results, this suggests that the brain produces temporally individualized responses to speech and music sounds that are stronger than the responses to other natural sounds. In addition to highlighting the importance of speech and music for the human brain, the techniques used here could be a cost-effective, temporally precise, and efficient way to study the human brain's selectivity for speech and music in other populations.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biophysical model; Classification analysis; EEG; Music; Natural sounds; Speech

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31962174     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Jeremy W Murphy; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras.

Authors:  Kevin D Prinsloo; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Music-selective neural populations arise without musical training.

Authors:  Dana Boebinger; Sam V Norman-Haignere; Josh H McDermott; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Multiscale temporal integration organizes hierarchical computation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Laura K Long; Orrin Devinsky; Werner Doyle; Ifeoma Irobunda; Edward M Merricks; Neil A Feldstein; Guy M McKhann; Catherine A Schevon; Adeen Flinker; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Auditory and cross-modal attentional bias toward positive natural sounds: Behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Yanmei Wang; Zhenwei Tang; Xiaoxuan Zhang; Libing Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 6.  On the encoding of natural music in computational models and human brains.

Authors:  Seung-Goo Kim
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.152

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.