Literature DB >> 31961417

Effect of Sunscreen Application on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Murali K Matta1, Jeffry Florian1, Robbert Zusterzeel1, Nageswara R Pilli1, Vikram Patel1, Donna A Volpe1, Yang Yang2, Luke Oh3, Edward Bashaw3, Issam Zineh3, Carlos Sanabria4, Sarah Kemp4, Anthony Godfrey4, Steven Adah5, Sergio Coelho5, Jian Wang6, Lesley-Anne Furlong6, Charles Ganley6, Theresa Michele5, David G Strauss1.   

Abstract

Importance: A prior pilot study demonstrated the systemic absorption of 4 sunscreen active ingredients; additional studies are needed to determine the systemic absorption of additional active ingredients and how quickly systemic exposure exceeds 0.5 ng/mL as recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Objective: To assess the systemic absorption and pharmacokinetics of the 6 active ingredients (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, homosalate, octisalate, and octinoxate) in 4 sunscreen products under single- and maximal-use conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial at a clinical pharmacology unit (West Bend, Wisconsin) was conducted in 48 healthy participants. The study was conducted between January and February 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 sunscreen products, formulated as lotion (n = 12), aerosol spray (n = 12), nonaerosol spray (n = 12), and pump spray (n = 12). Sunscreen product was applied at 2 mg/cm2 to 75% of body surface area at 0 hours on day 1 and 4 times on day 2 through day 4 at 2-hour intervals, and 34 blood samples were collected over 21 days from each participant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the maximum plasma concentration of avobenzone over days 1 through 21. Secondary outcomes were the maximum plasma concentrations of oxybenzone, octocrylene, homosalate, octisalate, and octinoxate over days 1 through 21.
Results: Among 48 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 38.7 [13.2] years; 24 women [50%]; 23 white [48%], 23 African American [48%], 1 Asian [2%], and 1 of unknown race/ethnicity [2%]), 44 (92%) completed the trial. Geometric mean maximum plasma concentrations of all 6 active ingredients were greater than 0.5 ng/mL, and this threshold was surpassed on day 1 after a single application for all active ingredients. For avobenzone, the overall maximum plasma concentrations were 7.1 ng/mL (coefficient of variation [CV], 73.9%) for lotion, 3.5 ng/mL (CV, 70.9%) for aerosol spray, 3.5 ng/mL (CV, 73.0%) for nonaerosol spray, and 3.3 ng/mL (CV, 47.8%) for pump spray. For oxybenzone, the concentrations were 258.1 ng/mL (CV, 53.0%) for lotion and 180.1 ng/mL (CV, 57.3%) for aerosol spray. For octocrylene, the concentrations were 7.8 ng/mL (CV, 87.1%) for lotion, 6.6 ng/mL (CV, 78.1%) for aerosol spray, and 6.6 ng/mL (CV, 103.9%) for nonaerosol spray. For homosalate, concentrations were 23.1 ng/mL (CV, 68.0%) for aerosol spray, 17.9 ng/mL (CV, 61.7%) for nonaerosol spray, and 13.9 ng/mL (CV, 70.2%) for pump spray. For octisalate, concentrations were 5.1 ng/mL (CV, 81.6%) for aerosol spray, 5.8 ng/mL (CV, 77.4%) for nonaerosol spray, and 4.6 ng/mL (CV, 97.6%) for pump spray. For octinoxate, concentrations were 7.9 ng/mL (CV, 86.5%) for nonaerosol spray and 5.2 ng/mL (CV, 68.2%) for pump spray. The most common adverse event was rash, which developed in 14 participants. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study conducted in a clinical pharmacology unit and examining sunscreen application among healthy participants, all 6 of the tested active ingredients administered in 4 different sunscreen formulations were systemically absorbed and had plasma concentrations that surpassed the FDA threshold for potentially waiving some of the additional safety studies for sunscreens. These findings do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03582215.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31961417      PMCID: PMC6990686          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.20747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  5 in total

1.  Exposure patterns of UV filters, fragrances, parabens, phthalates, organochlor pesticides, PBDEs, and PCBs in human milk: correlation of UV filters with use of cosmetics.

Authors:  Margret Schlumpf; Karin Kypke; Matthias Wittassek; Juergen Angerer; Hermann Mascher; Daniel Mascher; Cora Vökt; Monika Birchler; Walter Lichtensteiger
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters.

Authors:  M Krause; A Klit; M Blomberg Jensen; T Søeborg; H Frederiksen; M Schlumpf; W Lichtensteiger; N E Skakkebaek; K T Drzewiecki
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2012-06

3.  Variation in stratum corneum protein content as a function of anatomical site and ethnic group.

Authors:  N Raj; R Voegeli; A V Rawlings; S Gibbons; M R Munday; B Summers; M E Lane
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 4.  Human safety and efficacy of ultraviolet filters and sunscreen products.

Authors:  J F Nash
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Effect of Sunscreen Application Under Maximal Use Conditions on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Murali K Matta; Robbert Zusterzeel; Nageswara R Pilli; Vikram Patel; Donna A Volpe; Jeffry Florian; Luke Oh; Edward Bashaw; Issam Zineh; Carlos Sanabria; Sarah Kemp; Anthony Godfrey; Steven Adah; Sergio Coelho; Jian Wang; Lesley-Anne Furlong; Charles Ganley; Theresa Michele; David G Strauss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  31 in total

1.  Sunscreens and their usefulness: have we made any progress in the last two decades?

Authors:  Nick Serpone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer.

Authors:  Megan Sander; Michael Sander; Toni Burbidge; Jennifer Beecker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Age of Hubris.

Authors:  Saul Miller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Errors in Table 1, Figure 3, and Results Section.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Understanding Formulation and Temperature Effects on Dermal Transport Kinetics by IVPT and Multiphysics Simulation.

Authors:  Paige N Zambrana; Peng Hou; Dana C Hammell; Tonglei Li; Audra L Stinchcomb
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  In Vitro Testing of Sunscreens for Dermal Absorption: Method Comparison and Rank Order Correlation with In Vivo Absorption.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Ann-Marie Ako-Adounvo; Jiang Wang; Sergio G Coelho; Steven A Adah; Murali K Matta; David Strauss; Theresa M Michele; Jian Wang; Patrick J Faustino; Thomas O'Connor; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  The new kids on the block: Emerging obesogens.

Authors:  Raquel Chamorro-Garcia; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-08

8.  Practical application of the interim internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC): a case study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Najjar; Corie A Ellison; Sebastien Gregoire; Nicola J Hewitt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 9.  Pharmacologic manipulation of skin pigmentation.

Authors:  Gabriel H Kindl; John A D'Orazio
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.159

10.  New methods for assessing secondary performance attributes of sunscreens suitable for professional outdoor work.

Authors:  Marc Rocholl; Patricia Weinert; Stephan Bielfeldt; Sabrina Laing; Klaus Peter Wilhelm; Claas Ulrich; Swen Malte John
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.