Donna M Vallone1,2,3, Alison F Cuccia1, Jodie Briggs1, Haijun Xiao1, Barbara A Schillo1, Elizabeth C Hair1,2. 1. Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia. 2. Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York.
Abstract
Importance: The increasing use rates of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among young people in the United States have been largely associated with the emergence of high-nicotine-delivery device JUUL. Relevant data are needed to monitor e-cigarette, specifically JUUL, use to help inform intervention efforts. Objective: To estimate the prevalence, patterns, and factors associated over time with e-cigarette use among adolescents and younger adults in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two nationally representative longitudinal samples of adolescents and younger adults aged 15 to 34 years were drawn from the Truth Longitudinal Cohort, a national, probability-based cohort. Participants in this cohort were recruited through address-based sampling, and subsamples were recruited from a probability-based online panel. The present cohort study used data from follow-up online surveys, specifically, wave 7 (N = 14 379; collected from February 15, 2018, to May 25, 2018) and wave 8 (N = 12 114; collected from February 10, 2019, to May 17, 2019). Respondents reported their use of e-cigarettes, JUUL, and combustible tobacco products as well as their harm perceptions, household smoking status, sensation-seeking, friends' e-cigarette use, and demographic information. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were ever and current (past 30 days) JUUL use. χ2 Analyses assessed differences in JUUL use by psychosocial and demographic characteristics. Logistic regression models identified the significant factors associated with wave 8 ever and current JUUL use among wave 7 e-cigarette-naive participants. Results: A total of 14 379 participants (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [0.09] years; 8142 female [51.0%]) were included in wave 7 and 12 114 (mean [SD] age, 24.5 [0.10] years; 6835 female [50.1%]) in wave 8. JUUL use statistically significantly increased from wave 7 to wave 8 among ever users (6.0% [n = 1105] to 13.5% [2111]; P < .001) and current users (3.3% [680] to 6.1% [993]; P < .001). JUUL use increased among every age group and was highest among those aged 18 to 20 years (23.9% [491] ever users and 12.8% [340] current users) and 21 to 24 years (18.1% [360] ever users and 8.2% [207] current users). Users reported a higher prevalence of frequent use in wave 8 compared with wave 7 (37.6% vs 26.1%; P < .01). Significant factors associated with future JUUL use among e-cigarette-naive participants included younger age, combustible tobacco use, lower harm perceptions, sensation seeking, and friends' e-cigarette use. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the e-cigarette device JUUL appears to be associated with the youth e-cigarette epidemic, attracting new users and facilitating frequent use with their highly addictive nicotine content and appealing flavors. Findings of this study underscore the critical need for increased e-cigarette product regulation at the federal, state, and local levels.
Importance: The increasing use rates of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among young people in the United States have been largely associated with the emergence of high-nicotine-delivery device JUUL. Relevant data are needed to monitor e-cigarette, specifically JUUL, use to help inform intervention efforts. Objective: To estimate the prevalence, patterns, and factors associated over time with e-cigarette use among adolescents and younger adults in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two nationally representative longitudinal samples of adolescents and younger adults aged 15 to 34 years were drawn from the Truth Longitudinal Cohort, a national, probability-based cohort. Participants in this cohort were recruited through address-based sampling, and subsamples were recruited from a probability-based online panel. The present cohort study used data from follow-up online surveys, specifically, wave 7 (N = 14 379; collected from February 15, 2018, to May 25, 2018) and wave 8 (N = 12 114; collected from February 10, 2019, to May 17, 2019). Respondents reported their use of e-cigarettes, JUUL, and combustible tobacco products as well as their harm perceptions, household smoking status, sensation-seeking, friends' e-cigarette use, and demographic information. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were ever and current (past 30 days) JUUL use. χ2 Analyses assessed differences in JUUL use by psychosocial and demographic characteristics. Logistic regression models identified the significant factors associated with wave 8 ever and current JUUL use among wave 7 e-cigarette-naive participants. Results: A total of 14 379 participants (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [0.09] years; 8142 female [51.0%]) were included in wave 7 and 12 114 (mean [SD] age, 24.5 [0.10] years; 6835 female [50.1%]) in wave 8. JUUL use statistically significantly increased from wave 7 to wave 8 among ever users (6.0% [n = 1105] to 13.5% [2111]; P < .001) and current users (3.3% [680] to 6.1% [993]; P < .001). JUUL use increased among every age group and was highest among those aged 18 to 20 years (23.9% [491] ever users and 12.8% [340] current users) and 21 to 24 years (18.1% [360] ever users and 8.2% [207] current users). Users reported a higher prevalence of frequent use in wave 8 compared with wave 7 (37.6% vs 26.1%; P < .01). Significant factors associated with future JUUL use among e-cigarette-naive participants included younger age, combustible tobacco use, lower harm perceptions, sensation seeking, and friends' e-cigarette use. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the e-cigarette device JUUL appears to be associated with the youth e-cigarette epidemic, attracting new users and facilitating frequent use with their highly addictive nicotine content and appealing flavors. Findings of this study underscore the critical need for increased e-cigarette product regulation at the federal, state, and local levels.
Authors: Maciej L Goniewicz; Ribhav Gupta; Yong Hee Lee; Skyler Reinhardt; Sungroul Kim; Bokyeong Kim; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2015-02-07
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Elizabeth C Hair; Alexandria Smith; Morgane Bennett; Jessica Miller Rath; Randall K Thomas; Mansour Fahimi; J Michael Dennis; Donna Vallone Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; David R Strong; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jennifer B Unger; Steve Sussman; Nathaniel R Riggs; Matthew D Stone; Rubin Khoddam; Jonathan M Samet; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Jaime E Sidani; Beth L Hoffman; Samir Soneji; James D Sargent; Robert M Hoffman; Michael J Fine Journal: Am J Med Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Alexa R Romberg; Erin J Miller Lo; Alison F Cuccia; Jeffrey G Willett; Haijun Xiao; Elizabeth C Hair; Donna M Vallone; Kristy Marynak; Brian A King Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrea S Gentzke; MeLisa Creamer; Karen A Cullen; Bridget K Ambrose; Gordon Willis; Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: René A Arrazola; Linda J Neff; Sara M Kennedy; Enver Holder-Hayes; Christopher D Jones Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: H Isabella Lanza; Adam M Leventhal; Junhan Cho; Jessica L Braymiller; Evan A Krueger; Rob McConnell; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jessica L King; Cynthia K Suerken; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Nadja Mallock; Andrea Rabenstein; Solveig Gernun; Peter Laux; Christoph Hutzler; Susanne Karch; Gabriele Koller; Frank Henkler-Stephani; Maria Kristina Parr; Oliver Pogarell; Andreas Luch; Tobias Rüther Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alexandra Loukas; C Nathan Marti; Keryn E Pasch; Melissa B Harrell; Anna V Wilkinson; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jessica L King; Amir Alexander; Hollie L Tripp; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: David T Levy; Luz María Sánchez-Romero; Nargiz Travis; Zhe Yuan; Yameng Li; Sarah Skolnick; Jihyoun Jeon; Jamie Tam; Rafael Meza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 4.614