Literature DB >> 30377241

Prevalence and correlates of JUUL use among a national sample of youth and young adults.

Donna M Vallone1,2,3, Morgane Bennett1,4, Haijun Xiao1, Lindsay Pitzer1, Elizabeth C Hair1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of JUUL use and identify demographic and psychosocial correlates of use among youth and young adults in the USA.
METHODS: A national, probability-based sample was recruited via address-based sampling, with subsamples recruited from an existing probability-based online panel. Participants (N=14 379) ages 15-34 were surveyed about JUUL use, tobacco use, electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) harm perceptions, sensation seeking and demographic characteristics. Data were collected February-May 2018. Χ2 analyses assessed differences in JUUL use by demographic and psychosocial characteristics. Logistic regressions identified significant correlates of ever and current JUUL use.
RESULTS: Overall, 6.0% reported ever JUUL use, and 3.3% reported past 30-day (ie, current) use. Rates were higher among participants aged 15-17 and 18-21 years, with 9.5% and 11.2% reporting ever use, and 6.1% and 7.7% reporting current use, respectively. Among current users aged 15-17 years, 55.8% reported use on 3 or more days in the past month, and over a quarter reported use on 10-30 days. Significant correlates of use included younger age, white race, greater financial comfort, perceptions of ENDS as less harmful than cigarettes, household ENDS use, high sensation seeking and current combustible tobacco use.
CONCLUSION: JUUL use was significantly higher among young people, with those under 21 having significantly higher odds of ever and current use. Frequency of use patterns suggest youth may not be experimenting with the device but using it regularly. Given the high nicotine content of JUUL, there is concern over the potential for addiction and other serious health consequences among young people. Findings suggest strong regulatory actions are needed to prevent youth and young adult uptake. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; prevention; surveillance and monitoring

Year:  2018        PMID: 30377241     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  60 in total

1.  ENDS Device Type and Initiation of Combustible Tobacco Products Among Adolescents.

Authors:  Aslesha Sumbe; Stephanie L Clendennen; Samuel C Opara; Christian D Jackson; Baojiang Chen; Anna V Wilkinson; Melissa B Harrell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Initiation of any tobacco and five tobacco products across 3 years among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016).

Authors:  Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Elizabeth L Seaman; Karin A Kasza; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Hannah Day; Gabriella Anic; Lynn C Hull; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Lisa D Gardner; Hoda T Hammad; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016).

Authors:  Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Gabriella Anic; Lisa D Gardner; Hoda T Hammad; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Prevalence of using pod-based vaping devices by brand among youth and young adults.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Samir S Soneji; Kelvin Choi; Meghan B Moran
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  The E-Cigarette Debate: What Counts as Evidence?

Authors:  Amy Lauren Fairchild; Ronald Bayer; Ju Sung Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Who is JUULing and Why? An Examination of Young Adult Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Users.

Authors:  Kathleen R Case; Josephine T Hinds; MeLisa R Creamer; Alexandra Loukas; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Real-World Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Strategies for Young and Older Adults: Findings From a Nationally Representative Cohort.

Authors:  Shannon Lea Watkins; Johannes Thrul; Wendy Max; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Instagram's #JUUL: who's posting what.

Authors:  Kar-Hai Chu; Sara J Matheny; Jaime E Sidani; Jon-Patrick Allem; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Electronic cigarette dependence and demand among pod mod users as a function of smoking status.

Authors:  Eleanor L S Leavens; Tracy T Smith; Noelle Natale; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-04-16

10.  JUUL electronic cigarettes: Nicotine exposure and the user experience.

Authors:  Natalie Nardone; Gideon St Helen; Newton Addo; Sandra Meighan; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.