| Literature DB >> 31960610 |
Xiang Zhou1, Mengchao Jin1, Lei Liu2, Zongliang Yu2, Xiang Lu3, Hao Zhang4.
Abstract
AIM: Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that intestinal microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) is involved in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases. The present study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of TMAO in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular outcomes; Chronic heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Trimethylamine N-oxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31960610 PMCID: PMC7083407 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Baseline characteristics of patients in this study
| Overall ( | TMAO <4.5 μmol/L | TMAO ≥4.5 μmol/L |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 73 (64–80) | 71 (61–78) | 74 (66–81) | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 828 (68.5) | 425 (70.4) | 403 (66.7) | NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.1 (25.4–30.2) | 27.9 (25.1–29.8) | 28.5 (25.6–30.7) | NS |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 126 (110–139) | 128 (113–142) | 123 (108–136) | NS |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 72 (63–82) | 74 (65–85) | 68 (60–78) | 0.003 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 83 (69–98) | 85 (72–101) | 81 (67–95) | NS |
| Previous history | ||||
| Atrial fibrillation (%) | 225 (18.6) | 90 (14.9) | 135 (22.4) | 0.015 |
| Hypertension (%) | 540 (44.7) | 256 (42.4) | 284 (47.0) | NS |
| Diabetes (%) | 345 (28.6) | 132 (21.9) | 213 (35.3) | <0.001 |
| Hyperlipidaemia (%) | 479 (39.7) | 248 (41.1) | 231 (38.2) | NS |
| NYHA class III–IV (%) | 484 (40.1) | 287 (47.5) | 197 (32.6) | <0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 39 (35–42) | 43 (38–46) | 34 (30–38) | <0.001 |
| Revascularization (%) | 996 (82.5) | 514 (85.1) | 482 (79.8) | NS |
| Medical treatment | ||||
| Aspirin (%) | 1042 (86.3) | 532 (88.1) | 510 (84.4) | NS |
| Clopidogrel (%) | 123 (10.2) | 57 (9.4) | 66 (10.9) | NS |
| Ticagrelor (%) | 170 (14.1) | 89 (14.7) | 81 (13.4) | NS |
| Statin (%) | 985 (81.5) | 521 (86.3) | 464 (76.8) | 0.021 |
| Beta‐blocker (%) | 924 (76.5) | 488 (80.8) | 436 (72.2) | 0.032 |
| ACE‐I/ARB (%) | 879 (72.8) | 453 (75.0) | 426 (70.5) | NS |
| Spironolactone (%) | 701 (58.0) | 340 (56.3) | 361 (59.8) | NS |
| NT‐proBNP (pg/mL) | 2465 (1589–3627) | 1398 (892–2304) | 3826 (2680–5245) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 74 (58–86) | 80 (65–94) | 63 (50–75) | <0.001 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 3.8 (2.1–6.3) | 3.0 (1.5–5.2) | 4.7 (3.2–7.1) | 0.028 |
Values are median (interquartile range) or n (%). ACE‐I, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NS, not significant; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; TMAO, trimethylamine N‐oxide.
Hazard ratio of plasma trimethylamine N‐oxide levels for major adverse cardiac events
| Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2.83 μmol/L | 2.83–4.50 μmol/L | 4.50–7.92 μmol/L | >7.92 μmol/L | |
| Unadjusted | 1 | 1.26 (0.79–2.01) | 1.94 (1.48–2.80) | 3.15 (2.09–4.73) |
| Adjusted Model 1 | 1 | 1.14 (0.73–1.85) | 1.52 (1.07–2.46) | 2.31 (1.42–3.59) |
| Adjusted Model 2 | 1 | 1.09 (0.62–1.74) | 1.30 (0.86–2.09) | 1.68 (1.13–2.81) |
| Adjusted Model 3 | 1 | 1.06 (0.57–1.70) | 1.24 (0.76–1.95) | 1.57 (1.08–2.64) |
Model 1: adjusted for traditional risk factors, including age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Model 2: adjusted for Model 1 plus log‐transformed N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Model 3: adjusted for Model 2 plus log‐transformed high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein.
P < 0.01.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of event‐free survival for major adverse cardiac events in patients with chronic heart failure after myocardial infarction, stratified according to the quartiles of plasma trimethylamine N‐oxide levels.
Figure 2Relationship between plasma trimethylamine N‐oxide levels and major adverse cardiac events, stratified according to baseline characteristics. Forest plot of the hazard ratio of major adverse cardiac events comparing first and fourth quartiles of plasma trimethylamine N‐oxide levels. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein.
Hazard ratio of plasma trimethylamine N‐oxide levels for all‐cause mortality
| Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2.83 μmol/L | 2.83–4.50 μmol/L | 4.50–7.92 μmol/L | >7.92 μmol/L | |
| Unadjusted | 1 | 1.21 (0.75–1.96) | 1.87 (1.34–2.73) | 3.02 (1.98–4.56) |
| Adjusted Model 1 | 1 | 1.12 (0.70–1.82) | 1.39 (0.95–2.18) | 2.15 (1.37–3.24) |
| Adjusted Model 2 | 1 | 1.06 (0.59–1.68) | 1.23 (0.79–1.91) | 1.60 (1.09–2.67) |
| Adjusted Model 3 | 1 | 1.04 (0.55–1.63) | 1.19 (0.72–1.80) | 1.53 (1.06–2.51) |
Model 1: adjusted for traditional risk factors, including age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Model 2: adjusted for Model 1 plus log‐transformed N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Model 3: adjusted for Model 2 plus log‐transformed high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein.
P < 0.01.