Literature DB >> 31960594

Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.

Mattias Delpont1, Manon Racicot2, André Durivage3, Lucie Fornili1, Jean-Luc Guerin1, Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt4, Mathilde C Paul1.   

Abstract

Biosecurity is crucial for infectious disease prevention, more importantly in the absence of vaccination. The need for improving the implementation of biosecurity practices was highlighted in French duck farms following the 2016-2017 H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) epidemic. Farmers have multiple reasons for not implementing biosecurity practices: external (time, money) and internal (socio-psychological). The purpose of this study was to determine how sets of socio-psychological factors (i.e. knowledge on biosecurity and avian influenza transmission, attitudes, personality traits, social background) affect the adoption of on-farm biosecurity practices. Biosecurity practices and socio-psychological determinants were assessed during 127 duck farm visits, in South West France, using both questionnaires and on-farm observations. Factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) identified three groups of farmers with different socio-psychological profiles: the first group was characterized by minimal knowledge, negative attitudes towards biosecurity, little social pressure and a low level of conscientiousness. The second group was characterized by more extensive experience in poultry production, higher stress and social pressure. The third group was characterized by less experience in poultry production, better knowledge and positive attitudes towards biosecurity, increased self-confidence and orientation towards action. The first group had a significantly lower adoption of biosecurity measures than the two other groups. A better understanding of the factors involved in farmers' decision-making could improve the efficiency of interventions aiming at improving and maintaining the level of on-farm biosecurity in the duck industry.
© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avian influenza; compliance; epidemiology; perception; poultry; socio-psychological factors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960594     DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   5.005


  7 in total

1.  Big data-based risk assessment of poultry farms during the 2020/2021 highly pathogenic avian influenza epidemic in Korea.

Authors:  Hachung Yoon; Ilseob Lee; Hyeonjeong Kang; Kyung-Sook Kim; Eunesub Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Sheep farmers' attitudes towards lameness control: Qualitative exploration of factors affecting adoption of the lameness Five-Point Plan.

Authors:  Caroline M Best; Alison Z Pyatt; Janet Roden; Malgorzata Behnke; Kate Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses at the Wild-Domestic Bird Interface in Europe: Future Directions for Research and Surveillance.

Authors:  Josanne H Verhagen; Ron A M Fouchier; Nicola Lewis
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Characterization of commercial poultry farms in Mexico: Towards a better understanding of biosecurity practices and antibiotic usage patterns.

Authors:  Erika Ornelas-Eusebio; Gary García-Espinosa; Karine Laroucau; Gina Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Determinants of farmers' biosecurity mindset: A social-ecological model using systems thinking.

Authors:  Hai-Ni Pao; Elizabeth Jackson; Tsang-Sung Yang; Jyan-Syung Tsai; Watson H T Sung; Dirk U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-15

6.  Viral tropism and detection of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in feathers of ducks and geese.

Authors:  Nicolas Gaide; Charlotte Foret-Lucas; Thomas Figueroa; Timothée Vergne; Marie-Noëlle Lucas; Luc Robertet; Marie Souvestre; Guillaume Croville; Guillaume Le Loc'h; Maxence Delverdier; Jean-Luc Guérin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Risk perception of COVID-19: A comparative analysis of China and South Korea.

Authors:  Yangyang Chen; Jiahao Feng; An Chen; Jae Eun Lee; Longtian An
Journal:  Int J Disaster Risk Reduct       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.320

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.