Literature DB >> 31956531

Characterizing optical coherence tomography speckle fluctuation spectra of mammary organoids during suppression of intracellular motility.

Lin Yang1, Xiao Yu1, Ashley M Fuller2, Melissa A Troester2,3, Amy L Oldenburg1,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An understanding of how the mammary gland responds to toxicant and drug exposures can shed light on mechanisms of breast cancer initiation/progression and therapeutic effectiveness, respectively. In this study, we employed noninvasive, label-free and high-throughput optical coherence tomography speckle fluctuation spectroscopy (OCT-SFS) to track exposure-response relationships in three-dimensional (3D) mammary epithelial organoid models.
METHODS: OCT-SFS is sensitive to relatively high speed (~0.16-8 µm/min) motions of subcellular light scattering components occurring over short (~2-114 s) time scales, termed "intracellular motility." In this study, OCT speckle fluctuation spectra are quantified by two metrics: the intracellular motility amplitude, M, and frequency-dependent motility roll-off, α. OCT-SFS was performed on human mammary organoid models comprised of pre-malignant MCF10DCIS.com cells or MCF7 adenocarcinoma cells over 6 days of exposure to either a microtubule inhibitor (Paclitaxel, Taxol) or a myosin II inhibitor (Blebbistatin). Raw values of α and M were normalized to a dynamic range corresponding to fixed (0%) and live/homeostatic (100%) organoids for each cell line.
RESULTS: In this work, we observed a significant decrease in both M and α of MCF10DCIS.com organoids after 24 hours of exposure to Taxol (P<0.001), and a significant decrease only in α for MCF7 organoids after 48 hours of exposure (P<0.0001). We also observed a significant decrease in both M and α of MCF7 organoids at the longest exposure time of 6 days to Blebbistatin (P<0.0001), and a significant decrease only in M for MCF10DCIS.com organoids after 24 hours of exposure (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: OCT-SFS revealed cell line-specific response patterns, in terms of intracellular motility, to different motility suppression mechanisms. This provides a foundation for future OCT-SFS studies of longitudinal responses of the mammary gland in toxicology and drug research. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell motility; epithelial cells; optical coherence tomography (OCT); optical imaging; organoids

Year:  2020        PMID: 31956531      PMCID: PMC6960418          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.08.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  31 in total

1.  Time-dependent speckle in holographic optical coherence imaging and the health of tumor tissue.

Authors:  P Yu; L Peng; M Mustata; J J Turek; M R Melloch; D D Nolte
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Speckle fluctuation spectroscopy of intracellular motion in living tissue using coherence-domain digital holography.

Authors:  Kwan Jeong; John J Turek; David D Nolte
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Volumetric motility-contrast imaging of tissue response to cytoskeletal anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Kwan Jeong; John J Turek; David D Nolte
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Dynamic full field optical coherence tomography: subcellular metabolic contrast revealed in tissues by interferometric signals temporal analysis.

Authors:  Clement Apelian; Fabrice Harms; Olivier Thouvenin; A Claude Boccara
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces.

Authors:  Colin D Paul; Panagiotis Mistriotis; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Piperine inhibits the growth and motility of triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Anna L Greenshields; Carolyn D Doucette; Kimberly M Sutton; Laurence Madera; Henry Annan; Paul B Yaffe; Allison F Knickle; Zhongmin Dong; David W Hoskin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Microtubule destabilising agents: far more than just antimitotic anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Darcy Bates; Alan Eastman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  In vitro cell migration and invasion assays.

Authors:  Nina Kramer; Angelika Walzl; Christine Unger; Margit Rosner; Georg Krupitza; Markus Hengstschläger; Helmut Dolznig
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture.

Authors:  Kayla Duval; Hannah Grover; Li-Hsin Han; Yongchao Mou; Adrian F Pegoraro; Jeffery Fredberg; Zi Chen
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07

10.  Contractile forces regulate cell division in three-dimensional environments.

Authors:  Ayelet Lesman; Jacob Notbohm; David A Tirrell; Guruswami Ravichandran
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

1.  Tracking the invasion of breast cancer cells in paper-based 3D cultures by OCT motility analysis.

Authors:  Julie C McIntosh; Lin Yang; Ting Wang; Haibo Zhou; Matthew R Lockett; Amy L Oldenburg
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Imaging intracellular motion with dynamic micro-optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hui Min Leung; Michelle L Wang; Hany Osman; Elham Abouei; Calum MacAulay; Michele Follen; Joseph A Gardecki; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Imaging and characterization of transitions in biofilm morphology via anomalous diffusion following environmental perturbation.

Authors:  Honggu Choi; Farzana R Zaki; Guillermo L Monroy; Jungeun Won; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Volumetric growth tracking of patient-derived cancer organoids using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daniel A Gil; Dustin A Deming; Melissa C Skala
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Dynamic Contrast Microscopic Optical Coherence Tomography As a Novel Method for Assessing Corneal Epithelium During Exposure to Benzalkonium Chloride.

Authors:  Gwen Musial; Tabea Kohlfaerber; Martin Ahrens; Hinnerk Schulz-Hildebrandt; Philipp Steven; Gereon Hüttmann
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Patient-derived cancer organoid tracking with wide-field one-photon redox imaging to assess treatment response.

Authors:  Daniel A Gil; Dustin Deming; Melissa C Skala
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Common-path interferometer for digital holographic Doppler spectroscopy of living biological tissues.

Authors:  Kwan Jeong; Maria Josef Lopera; John Turek; David Nolte
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 8.  Alginate Microencapsulation for Three-Dimensional In Vitro Cell Culture.

Authors:  Sung-Min Kang; Ji-Hoon Lee; Yun Suk Huh; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-06-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.