Metabolomic profiling of bloodstains on various absorbent and non-absorbent surfaces.

Bloodstains found at crime scenes contain immense information about the crime; thus, studies involving analysis of small molecules in bloodstains have been conducted. However, most of these studies have not accounted for the difference in the results of small molecule analysis due to the surface of bloodstains. To evaluate the "surface effect," we prepared bloodstains on seven surfaces, including both absorbent and non-absorbent surfaces, and performed global small molecule analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). We used three indicators: (1) count recovery rate (%) of molecular features (MFs), (2) the number of MFs extracted from the surface without bloodstains, and (3) difference in abundance recovery rate (%) of MFs, to determine the ranking of the seven surfaces in the order of their similarity with blood. We also confirmed the correlation between each surface and blood through multivariate analysis. We found that the non-absorbent surfaces ranked better than the absorbent surfaces; wooden flooring was ranked as the most efficient surface, followed by stainless, vinyl flooring, glass, tile, filter paper, and mixed cotton. This study will help in the selection of the most efficient surface for collection of bloodstains for small molecule analysis from a crime scene. This is the first study to identify the effects of surface on extraction of global small molecules from bloodstains; it will help forensic scientists in obtaining more accurate information from small molecules present in the bloodstains collected at the field. Graphical abstract.