Literature DB >> 31954690

Minimally Invasive Redo Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Multicentric Registry (SURD-IR).

Giuseppe Santarpino1, Paolo Berretta2, Utz Kappert3, Kevin Teoh4, Carmelo Mignosa5, Bart Meuris6, Emmanuel Villa7, Alberto Albertini8, Thierry P Carrel9, Martin Misfeld10, Gianluca Martinelli11, Kevin Phan12, Antonio Miceli13, Thierry Folliguet14, Malak Shrestha15, Marco Solinas16, Martin Andreas17, Carlo Savini18, Tristan Yan19, Theodor Fischlein20, Marco Di Eusanio21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reoperation for aortic valve replacement can be challenging and is usually associated with an increased risk for complications and mortality. The study aim was to report the results of a multicenter cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement with a sutureless or rapid-deployment prosthesis.
METHODS: From 2007 to 2018 data from 3651 patients were retrospectively collected from the Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry. Of them, 63 patients who had previously undergone cardiac surgery represented the study population. In-hospital clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: Mean age of the selected 63 patients was 75.3 ± 7.8 years and logistic EuroSCORE 10.1. Surgery was performed by ministernotomy in 43 patients (68.3%) and by anterior right thoracotomy in 20 (31.7%); 31 patients (49.2%) received the Perceval valve (Livanova PLC, London, UK) and 32 (50.8%) the Intuity valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Mean cross-clamp time was 57.8 ± 23.2 minutes and cardiopulmonary bypass time 95.0 ± 34.3 minutes. Neither conversion to full sternotomy nor in-hospital deaths occurred. Postoperative events were ischemic cerebral events in 3 patients (4.8%), need for pacemaker implantation in 2 (3.6%), bleeding requiring reoperation in 5 (8.9%), and dialysis in 1 (1.6%). Median intensive care unit stay was 1 day, and median length of hospital stay was 10 days. On echocardiographic evaluation 1 patient showed a significant postoperative aortic regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement with a sutureless or rapid-deployment prosthesis is a safe and feasible treatment strategy, resulting in fast recovery and improved postoperative outcome with no mortality and an acceptable complication rate.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954690     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Andrew A Mamo; David H Tian; Utz Kappert; Manuel Wilbring; Thierry Folliguet; Antonio Fiore; Antonio Miceli; Augusto D'Onofrio; Giorgia Cibin; Gino Gerosa; Mattia Glauber; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

Review 2.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Lorenzo Di Bacco; Antonio Miceli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Use of Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Prostheses in Challenging Reoperations.

Authors:  Igor Vendramin; Andrea Lechiancole; Daniela Piani; Gaetano Nucifora; Giovanni Benedetti; Sandro Sponga; Daniele Muser; Uberto Bortolotti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.