Literature DB >> 31953591

Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in three tertiary hospitals in Cairo, Egypt.

Amani A El-Kholy1, Samia A Girgis2, Mervat A F Shetta3, Dalia H Abdel-Hamid2, Arwa R Elmanakhly4.   

Abstract

High rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Gram-negative pathogens (GNP) have been reported in Egypt. Antimicrobial surveillance and identifying the genetic basis of AMR provide important information to optimize patient care. In this study, we aimed to identify the beta-lactam resistance phenotypes and genotypes of multidrug-resistant (MDR) non-repetitive GNP from 3 tertiary hospitals in Egypt. WZe studied 495 non-repetitive MDR Gram-negative isolates from patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), collected as part of the "Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends" (SMART) conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, from 2015 to 2016. Identification and susceptibility testing of GNP to antimicrobials were tested in each hospital laboratory and confirmed in a reference laboratory (International Health Management Associates (IHMA), Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA). Molecular identification of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESΒLs), AmpC, and carbapenem resistance genes was conducted in IHMA. Among the 495 MDR isolates, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were the most common (52.7% and 44.2%). K. pneumoniae was most susceptible to colistin, amikacin, ertapenem, and imipenem (92.7%, 72.7%, 69.3%, and 64%, respectively). E. coli was most susceptible to colistin (100%), amikacin (94.1%), imipenem (90.4%), and ertapenem (83.6%). ESBL was detected in 96.2% and ESBL genotypes included blaCTX-M-15 (70.1%), blaTEM-OSBL (48.5%), blaSHV-OSBL (27.9%), and blaCTX-M-14 (10.7%). AmpC resistance genes were identified in 9.7% of the isolates, dominated by blaCMY-2 (5.7%). Carbapenem resistance genes were detected in 45.3% of the isolates. In K. pneumoniae, blaOXA-48 dominated (40.6%), followed by blaNDM-1 (23.7%) and blaOXA-232 (4.5%). In E. coli, the most frequent genes were blaNDM-5 (9.6%), blaOXA-181 (5.5%), blaOXA-244 (3.7%), and blaNDM-1 (3.7%). blaKPC-2 was identified in 0.4% of isolates. Notably, 32.3% of isolates carried more than one resistance gene. Our findings emphasize the continued need for molecular surveillance of MDR pathogens, implementation of strict infection control measures, and antimicrobial stewardship policies in our hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31953591      PMCID: PMC7182536          DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03812-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Gram-negative pathogens (GNP) increased worldwide. A high rate of AMR has been reported in Egypt since more than 20 years, among GNP causing nosocomial infections and outbreaks [1-3]. AMR rates have increased especially among nosocomial GNP, probably due to widespread abuse of antimicrobials including carbapenems in Egyptian hospitals and poor compliance with infection control practices [4, 5]. In small-scale studies, bla, bla, bla, bla, and bla carbapenemase genes were detected in Egypt [6-8]. As the genetic basis of beta-lactam resistance was not yet studied at a large scale in Egypt, we aimed to molecularly characterize multidrug-resistant (MDR) GNP.

Methods

Study sites and strains

This study was conducted in 3 major tertiary care Egyptian hospitals participating in the “Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends” (SMART) from 2015 to 2016. The hospitals were Ain Shams University Hospital, Ain Shams Specialized University Hospital, and Dar Al-Fouad Hospital. Isolates were collected according to SMART protocol as previously reported [9-11]. Briefly, the participating hospitals collected 1070 non-repetitive consecutive GNP isolates from lower respiratory tract specimens, urine and pus or abdominal fluid of hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) during the study period. Of these, we studied 495 isolates that showed phenotypic resistance to third-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems. The identification of GNP, susceptibility testing, and detection of resistance phenotypes were conducted in hospital laboratories according to the methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [12] and confirmed in a reference laboratory (International Health Management Associates (IHMA), Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA), where susceptibility and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype were determined using the CLSI broth microdilution method with custom dehydrated panels manufactured by Trek Diagnostic Systems (Thermo Scientific, Independence, OH) in 2015–2016. MIC interpretive criteria followed the 2017 M100-S27 guidelines of the CLSI [13]. EUCAST breakpoints were used only for colistin against Enterobacteriaceae, because no CLSI breakpoints exist [14].The susceptibility of all Gram-negative isolates combined was calculated using breakpoints appropriate for each species.

Genotypic identification of antimicrobial resistance genes

The molecular characterization of ESBL and carbapenemases was done using the Check-Points MDR CT103 (Check-Points Health B.V., Wageningen, The Netherlands) microarray kit, which detects most carbapenemase, ESBL, and AmpC genes: ESΒLs (class A)—blaTEM, bla, bla, bla, bla, and bla; bla β-lactamase genes (class C)—bla, bla, bla, bla, bla, bla, and bla; and carbapenemases (class A)—bla and bla; (class B)—bla, bla, blaVIM, bla, and bla; and (class D)—bla. Then the genes encoding ESΒL, carbapenemases, and AmpC were sequenced in their entirety in IHMA [11].

Results

Strains and phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility

The 495 MDR isolates were derived from cIAI (181, 36%), LRTI (128, 26%), and cUTI (186, 38%). Overall Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli were the most common (52.7% and 44.2%) and were also the predominant organisms in cIAI (52.2% and 45.9%, respectively), cUTI (43% and 54.8%, respectively), and LRTI (71.1% and 26.6%, respectively) (Table 1). K. pneumoniae was most susceptible to colistin, amikacin, ertapenem, and imipenem (92.7%, 72.7%, 69.3%, and 64%, respectively). E. coli remained most susceptible to colistin (100%), amikacin (94.1%), imipenem (90.4%), and ertapenem (83.6%).
Table 1

Distribution of microorganism among clinical isolates

OrganismsIAIUTILRT
No.%No.%No.%
Escherichia coli (219)8345.910254.83426.6
Klebsiella pneumoniae (266)9552.58043.09171.1
Others (10)31.742.232.3
Total (495)181186128
Distribution of microorganism among clinical isolates

Identification of blaESBL genes of the TEM, SHV, and CTX-M types

ESBL production was detected in 96.2% of the MDR isolates (Table 2). ESBL genotypes included blaCTX-M-15 (70.1%), blaTEM-OSBL (48.5%), blaSHV-OSBL (27.9%), and blaCTX-M-14 (10.7%). The predominant ESBL gene in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae was bla (Table 3).
Table 2

Percentage of ESΒL, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemase genes among 495 MDR isolates

Resistance genesNumberPercentage
ESΒL47496.2
AmpC489.7
Carbapenemase22445.3
Table 3

ESΒL predominant genotypes among E. coli and K. pneumoniae

SHV no. (%)TEM no. (%)CTX-M-1 no. (%)CTX-9 no. (%)
SHV-OSBLSHV-12TEM-OSBLTEM-ESΒLCTX-M-55CTX-M-15CTX-M-27CTX-M-14
E. coli (219)171042215021
(0.5)(3.2)(47.5)(4.2)(4.2)(68.5)(0.9)(0.5)
K. pneumoniae (266)13634129101901252
(51.1)(12.8)(48.5)(0.4)0.0(71.4)(4.5)(19.5)
Others (10)11700709
(10)(10)(70)(0)(0)(70)(0)(90)
Total (495)13842240323471453
(27.9)(8.5)(48.5)(0.6)0.4(70.1)(2.8)(10.7)
Percentage of ESΒL, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemase genes among 495 MDR isolates ESΒL predominant genotypes among E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Identification of carbapenemase genes

Carbapenem resistance genes were detected in 45.3% of the MDR isolates. In K. pneumoniae, bla dominated (40.6%), followed by bla (23.7%) and bla (4.5%). In E. coli, the most frequent genes were bla (9.6%), bla (5.5%), bla (3.7%), and bla (3.7%). blaKPC-2 and bla were less frequently identified (Table 4).
Table 4

Carbapenemase genotypes among E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Carbapenemase genesKPC no. (%)OXA no. (%)MBL no. (%)VIM no. (%)
KPC-2OXA-48OXA-244OXA-232OXA-181NDM-1NDM-4NDM-5
E. coli (219)05801281211
(0)(2.3)(3.7)(0)(5.5)(3.7)(0.5)(9.6)(0.5)
K. pneumoniae (266)2108012363183
(0.8)(40.6)(0)(4.5)(1.1)(23.7)(0.4)(3.0)(1.1)
Others (10)020003011
(0)(20)(0)(0)(0)(30)(0)(10)(10)
Total (495)211581215742305
(0.4)(23.2)(1.6)(2.4)(3.0)(14.9)(0.4)(6.1)(1.0)
Carbapenemase genotypes among E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Identification of AmpC β-lactamases resistance genes

AmpC resistance genes were identified in 9.7% of the isolates; blaCMY-2 was the most predominant one (Table 5). In 153 isolates (32.3%), coexistence of 2 or more resistance genes was detected (Table 4). The commonest combination of 2 genes was bla with bla (2.6%); the commonest combination of 3 genes was bla, bla, and bla (9.2%); the commonest combination of 4 genes was bla, bla, bla, and bla (12.4%); and the commonest combination of more than 4 genes was bla, bla, bla, bla, bla, and bla (5.9%) (Table 6). Tables 7 and 8 show K. pneumoniae and E.coli susceptibility (%) against MDR- GNP per type of infection.
Table 5

Total AmpC β-lactamases genotype among Enterobacteriaceae isolates

CMY II no. (%)DHA-1ACT-TYPE
CMY-2CMYCMY-TYPECMY-4CMY-42CMY-59
282313263
(5.7)(0.4)(0.6)(0.2)(0.6)(0.4)(1.2)(0.6)
Table 6

Common combinations of resistant genes among tested isolates

Types of combinationNo. of isolatesPercentage
2 combination159.8
  blaCTX-M-15; blaNDM-542.6
3 combinations4428.8
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaNDM-1149.2
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-14; blaOXA-4885.2
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaOXA-4874.6
4 combinations7045.8
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaTEM-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaNDM-11912.4
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaCTX-M-14; blaOXA-48117.2
  blaSHV-12; blaCTX-M-15; blaCTX-M-27; blaOXA-4885.2
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaTEM-OSBL; blCTX-M-14; blaOXA-4863.9
  blaTEM-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaCMY-2; blaNDM-563.9
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaNDM-1; blaOXA-4853.3
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-14; blaNDM-1; blaOXA-4842.6
> 4 combinations2214.4
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaTEM-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaCTX-M-14; blaNDM-1; blaOXA-4895.9
  blaSHV-OSBL; blaCTX-M-15; blaCTX-M-14; blaNDM-1; blaOXA-4853.2
Table 7

K. pneumoniae susceptibility (%) against MDR-GNP per type of infection

Body siteAKAMCFEPCTXFOXCTZCROCSTETPIMPLEVTZP
IAI76.513.48.1019.43.1093.774.558.225.520.4
LRTI57.502.31.217.22.31.289.751.775.820.716.1
Urine84.21.95.71.414.35.71.497.181.46018.618.6
Total72.75.65.60.716.73.40.892.769.364.02218.6

AK amikacin, AMC ampicillin/sulbactam, FEP cefipeme, CTX ceftriaxone, FOX cefoxtine, CTZ ceftazidieme, CRO cefotaxime, CST colistin, ETP ertapenem, IMP imipenem, LEV levofloxacin, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam

Table 8

E. coli susceptibility (%) against MDR-GNP per type of infection

Body siteAKAMCFEPCTXFOXCTZCROCIPCSTETPIMPLEVTZP
IAI91.66.80012.110.8024.110084.386.725.343.4
LRTI91.218.20017.711.8017.710079.491.217.741.2
Urine96.814.31.10166.4011.710084.192.611.756.4
Total94.17.30.4014.29.1017.810083.690.418.348.9

AK amikacin, AMC ampicillin/sulbactam, FEP cefipeme, CTX ceftriaxone, FOX cefoxtine, CTZ ceftazidieme, CRO cefotaxime, CST colistin, ETP ertapenem, IMP imipenem, LEV levofloxacin, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam

Total AmpC β-lactamases genotype among Enterobacteriaceae isolates Common combinations of resistant genes among tested isolates K. pneumoniae susceptibility (%) against MDR-GNP per type of infection AK amikacin, AMC ampicillin/sulbactam, FEP cefipeme, CTX ceftriaxone, FOX cefoxtine, CTZ ceftazidieme, CRO cefotaxime, CST colistin, ETP ertapenem, IMP imipenem, LEV levofloxacin, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam E. coli susceptibility (%) against MDR-GNP per type of infection AK amikacin, AMC ampicillin/sulbactam, FEP cefipeme, CTX ceftriaxone, FOX cefoxtine, CTZ ceftazidieme, CRO cefotaxime, CST colistin, ETP ertapenem, IMP imipenem, LEV levofloxacin, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam

Discussion

Surveillance for AMR is essential to monitor trends, identify emerging resistance mechanisms, and support the antimicrobial stewardship programs. To our knowledge, this is the most extensive molecular study of AMR in Egypt including 495 MDR Gram-negative isolates. In all hospitals, more than half of infections were present on admission (community acquired or transferred from other hospitals; data not shown). We identified 43 resistance phenotypes distributed among isolates from the 3 hospitals. Typing of nosocomial GNP in each hospital based on the phenotypic resistance patterns showed no clonal spread except for few isolates in each hospital (data not shown). K. pneumoniae was a common pathogen in all 3 types of infection, and most isolates were MDR. Due to its large accessory genome including plasmids and chromosomal loci, K. pneumoniae isolates may act as opportunistic pathogens. Such strains infect critically ill and immunocompromised patients mostly, whereas other strains of K. pneumoniae (hyper-virulent) may even infect healthy people in community settings. Many of the virulent strains encode carbapenemases [15]. E. coli was a frequently identified pathogen from cIAI and cUTI, which is consistent with previous reports, and was also a frequent pathogen in LRTI. E. coli pneumonia is uncommon and may result from micro-aspiration of colonized upper airway secretions in severely ill patients; hence, it is a well-known cause of nosocomial pneumonia [16]. However, E. coli pneumonia may also be community-acquired in patients who have underlying diseases such as diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and E. coli UTI [17]. Our results confirm the results of previous studies in Egypt [3, 18] that showed high rates of ESΒL and carbapenem resistance among ICU pathogens. For example, in the study of Talaat et al. [18], ESBL and carbapenem resistance were identified in 54% and 13.8% of E. coli isolates compared with 42.5% and 48.1% in K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. Among the many types of ESΒLs reported, bla and bla are the most commonly identified worldwide as the genes encoding CTX-M enzymes (blaCTX-M) can be horizontally mobilized by various genetic elements [19]. This reflects the situation in Egypt as well. AmpC genes were less frequently identified (9.7%), usually in combination with other resistance genes. CMY-2-like enzymes were the most predominant. Other detected genes were bla, bla, and bla. This is in keeping with recent reports on acquisition of plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase producing Enterobacteriaceae after a travel to the tropics and North Africa including Egypt [20, 21]. The high rate of ESΒL in Egypt is essentially due to inappropriate use of antimicrobials in human and animal health care. Of the patients treated in public outpatient health care facilities, 49.8% received antibiotics, and antibiotics are still sold over the counter without prescription [22]. Moreover, there is extensive use of antimicrobials for prevention and treatment of infections in veterinary care, and ESΒL and AmpC resistance mechanisms were detected in veterinary E. coli isolates in Egypt [23]. This is an urgent public health problem especially with a growing body of evidence supporting foodborne transmission of resistance, especially from poultry, as poultry meat exhibits the highest levels of contamination by MDR bacteria [24, 25]. The most important mechanism of carbapenem resistance is the production of carbapenemases; therefore, all isolates were investigated to identify the carbapenemase genes. We identified them in 45.4% of tested isolates; bla followed by bla genes dominated, while only 2 isolates of K. pneumoniae harbored bla genes. These results confirm previous small-scale reports that the bla and bla genes are the predominant in Egypt and Middle East [26]. The present study detected massive coexistence of different resistance genes among tested isolates. This coexistence could have contributed to the observed elevated variability in resistance phenotypes and genotypes among GNP in Egypt [15]. In conclusion, our study detected alarming rates of resistance and identified many resistance mechanisms in clinical GNP from Egyptian tertiary care hospitals. These high resistance rates highlight the importance of continuous monitoring of the resistance trends, adherence to infection control policies, and underscore urgently implementing a national antimicrobial stewardship plan in Egypt.
  21 in total

1.  Food-borne origins of Escherichia coli causing extraintestinal infections.

Authors:  Amee R Manges; James R Johnson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Expanded spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from chickens with colibacillosis in Egypt.

Authors:  D A El-Shazly; S A Nasef; F F Mahmoud; Daniel Jonas
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Antimicrobial resistance in Cairo, Egypt 1999-2000: a survey of five hospitals.

Authors:  Amani El Kholy; Hadia Baseem; Geraldine S Hall; Gary W Procop; David L Longworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  In vitro susceptibilities of aerobic and facultative anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli from patients with intra-abdominal infections worldwide from 2005-2007: results from the SMART study.

Authors:  Stephen P Hawser; Samuel K Bouchillon; Daryl J Hoban; Robert E Badal
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Bacteremic Escherichia coli pneumonia.

Authors:  M Jonas; B A Cunha
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-11

6.  Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections in three intensive care units in Egypt.

Authors:  Abeer K Abdulall; Mahmoud M Tawfick; Arwa R El Manakhly; Amani El Kholy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Epidemiology and genetics of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Zhao; Zhi-Qing Hu
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.624

8.  Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada.

Authors:  Lucie Dutil; Rebecca Irwin; Rita Finley; Lai King Ng; Brent Avery; Patrick Boerlin; Anne Marie Bourgault; Linda Cole; Danielle Daignault; Andrea Desruisseau; Walter Demczuk; Linda Hoang; Greg B Horsman; Johanne Ismail; Frances Jamieson; Anne Maki; Ana Pacagnella; Dylan R Pillai
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Frequency and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria implicated in community urinary tract infections: a ten-year surveillance study (2000-2009).

Authors:  Inês Linhares; Teresa Raposo; António Rodrigues; Adelaide Almeida
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  A Point Prevalence Survey of Antibiotic Use in 18 Hospitals in Egypt.

Authors:  Maha Talaat; Tamer Saied; Amr Kandeel; Gehad A Abo El-Ata; Amani El-Kholy; Soad Hafez; Ashraf Osman; Mohamed Abdel Razik; Ghada Ismail; Sherine El-Masry; Rami Galal; Mohamad Yehia; Amira Amer; David P Calfee
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  In Vitro Investigation of the Impact of Bacterial-Fungal Interaction on Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Hani Moubasher; Amani Elkholy; May Sherif; Mariam Zahran; Sherif Elnagdy
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  AmpC β-Lactamase Variable Expression in Common Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Bacterial Pathogens from a Tertiary Hospital in Cairo, Egypt.

Authors:  Aliaa Ali El Shamy; Zainab Zakaria; Mahmoud M Tolba; Nermeen Salah Eldin; Al-Taher Rabea; Mahmoud M Tawfick; Hebatallah A Nasser
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-28

3.  Screening and Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales among Hospitalized Patients in the African Archipelago of Cape Verde.

Authors:  Samanta Freire; Teresa Grilo; Maria Luísa Teixeira; Euclides Fernandes; Laurent Poirel; Marta Aires-de-Sousa
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-14

4.  Insights on the performance of phenotypic tests versus genotypic tests for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Noha A Kamel; Sally T Tohamy; Ibrahim S Yahia; Khaled M Aboshanab
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.465

5.  Landscape of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Egypt: Survey and Literature Review.

Authors:  Amani El-Kholy; Hadir A El-Mahallawy; Noha Elsharnouby; Mohamed Abdel Aziz; Ahmed Mohamed Helmy; Ramy Kotb
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Phenotype-genotype correlations among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales recovered from four Egyptian hospitals with the report of SPM carbapenemase.

Authors:  Neveen A Abdelaziz
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.887

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.