Literature DB >> 31952450

Processing gapping: Parallelism and grammatical constraints.

Nayoun Kim1, Katy Carlson2, Mike Dickey3,4, Masaya Yoshida5.   

Abstract

This study aims to test two hypotheses about the online processing of Gapping: whether the parser inserts an ellipsis site in an incremental fashion in certain coordinated structures (the Incremental Ellipsis Hypothesis), or whether ellipsis is a late and dispreferred option (the Ellipsis as a Last Resort Hypothesis). We employ two offline acceptability rating experiments and a sentence fragment completion experiment to investigate to what extent the distribution of Gapping is controlled by grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints. Furthermore, an eye-tracking while reading experiment demonstrated that the parser inserts an ellipsis site incrementally but only when grammatical and extra-grammatical constraints allow for the insertion of the ellipsis site. This study shows that incremental building of the Gapping structure follows from the parser's general preference to keep the structure of the two conjuncts maximally parallel in a coordination structure as well as from grammatical restrictions on the distribution of Gapping such as the Coordination Constraint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gapping; coordination; ellipsis; grammatical constraint; parallelism

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31952450      PMCID: PMC7162722          DOI: 10.1177/1747021820903461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  13 in total

1.  Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing.

Authors:  E Gibson; N J Pearlmutter
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures.

Authors:  K Carlson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate processing of "missing" verbs in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Frank Wijnen; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin; Brian McElree
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  THE SYNTAX-DISCOURSE DIVIDE: PROCESSING ELLIPSIS.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Syntax       Date:  2005-08

6.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.

Authors:  Pia Knoeferle; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

8.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  The real-time processing of sluiced sentences.

Authors:  Josée Poirier; Katie Wolfinger; Lisa Spellman; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-10

10.  Hyper-active gap filling.

Authors:  Akira Omaki; Ellen F Lau; Imogen Davidson White; Myles L Dakan; Aaron Apple; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Puzzle of Argument Structure Mismatch in Gapping.

Authors:  Jiayi Lu; Nayoun Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.