Literature DB >> 10709187

Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing.

E Gibson1, N J Pearlmutter.   

Abstract

This paper discusses ways of determining whether the human parser is serial maintaining at most, one structural interpretation at each parse state, or whether it is parallel, maintaining more than one structural interpretation in at least some circumstances. We make four points. The first two counterclaims made by Lewis (2000): (1) that the availability of alternative structures should not vary as a function of the disambiguating material in some ranked parallel models; and (2) that parallel models predict a slow down during the ambiguous region for more syntactically ambiguous structures. Our other points concern potential methods for seeking experimental evidence relevant to the serial/parallel question. We discuss effects of the plausibility of a secondary structure in the ambiguous region (Pearlmutter & Mendelsohn, 1999) and suggest examining the distribution of reaction times in the disambiguating region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10709187     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005153330168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  8 in total

1.  Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models: empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm.

Authors:  R L Lewis
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

4.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.

Authors:  M J Spivey; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Constraints on sentence comprehension.

Authors:  E Gibson; N J Pearlmutter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Against repair-based reanalysis in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Daniel Grodner; Edward Gibson; Vered Argaman; Maria Babyonyshev
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

2.  Difficulty processing temporary syntactic ambiguities in Lewy body spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Murray Grossman; Rachel G Gross; Peachie Moore; Michael Dreyfuss; Corey T McMillan; Philip A Cook; Sherry Ash; Andrew Siderowf
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: evidence from self-paced reading.

Authors:  Benjamin Swets; Timothy Desmet; Charles Clifton; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

Review 4.  On directionality of phrase structure building.

Authors:  Cristiano Chesi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-02

5.  Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha Mohamed; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Semantic support and parallel parsing in Chinese.

Authors:  Yufen Hsieh; Julie E Boland
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

7.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Processing gap-filler dependencies in Chinese: What does it tell us about semantic processing?

Authors:  Shukhan Ng; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Processing gapping: Parallelism and grammatical constraints.

Authors:  Nayoun Kim; Katy Carlson; Mike Dickey; Masaya Yoshida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Real-time parallel processing of grammatical structure in the fronto-striatal system: a recurrent network simulation study using reservoir computing.

Authors:  Xavier Hinaut; Peter Ford Dominey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.