| Literature DB >> 31952307 |
Sara Ferraris1, Fernando Warchomicka2, Fatemeh Iranshahi2, Lia Rimondini3,4, Andrea Cochis3,4, Silvia Spriano1.
Abstract
Soft tissue adhesion and infection prevention are currently challenging for dental transmucosal or percutaneous orthopedic implants. It has previously been shown that aligned micro-grooves obtained by Electron Beam (EB) can drive fibroblast alignment for improved soft tissue adhesion. In this work, evidence is presented that the same technique can also be effective for a reduction of the infection risk. Grooves 10-30 µm wide and around 0.2 µm deep were obtained on Ti6Al4V by EB. EB treatment changes the crystalline structure and microstructure in a surface layer that is thicker than the groove depth. Unexpectedly, a significant bacterial reduction was observed. The surfaces were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, confocal microscopy, contact profilometry, wettability and bacterial adhesion tests. The influence of surface topography, microstructure and crystallography on bacterial adhesion was systematically investigated: it was evidenced that the bacterial reduction after EB surface treatment is not correlated with the grooves, but with the microstructure induced by the EB treatment, with a significant bacterial reduction when the surface microstructure has a high density of grain boundaries. This correlation between microstructure and bacterial adhesion was reported for the first time for Ti alloys.Entities:
Keywords: Titanium; bacteria adhesion; electron beam structuring; fibroblast alignment; microstructure
Year: 2020 PMID: 31952307 PMCID: PMC7013952 DOI: 10.3390/ma13020409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Ti6Al4V sample names and processing.
| Sample Name | Processing |
|---|---|
| MP | Mirror polishing |
| EB10 | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB10) |
| EB30 | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB30) |
| EB10HT | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB10) + heat treatment |
| EB10HT-etch | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB10) + heat treatment + etching |
| P10 | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB10) + mirror polishing |
| P30 | Mirror polishing + EB-structuring (EB30) + mirror polishing |
Figure 1FESEM images of the samples: (a) MP sample (Secondary Electron (SE) image); (b) MP sample (BSE image); (c) EB 10 sample (SE image); (d) EB 30 sample (SE image); (e) EB10HT sample (SE image); (f) EB10HT-etch sample (SE image); (g) cross section of the EB10 sample (SE image); (h) P10 sample (SE image).
Figure 2(a) Confocal microscopy 3D image of EB10 sample, (b) roughness measurements (contact profiler).
Figure 3XRD spectra (normalized to the highest peak) (a) whole spectra, (b) detail of the highest peak.
Ti6Al4V sample topography, structure and microstructure.
| Sample Name | Surface Appearance | Ra [µm] | Crystallographic Structure | Microstructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Smooth | 0.06 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti (α) | Bimodal (equiaxed primary α grains, secondary α lamellae and β phase) |
| EB10 | 10 µm grooves | 0.26 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti martensite (α’) | Martensitic microstructure |
| EB30 | 30 µm grooves | 0.25 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti martensite (α’) | Martensitic microstructure |
| EB10HT | 10 µm grooves | 0.32 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti (α) | α lamellae colonies |
| EB10HT-etch | Etched | 0.35 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti (α) | α lamellae colonies |
| P10 | Smooth | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti martensite (α’) | Martensitic microstructure | |
| P30 | Smooth | 0.03 | Prevalence of hexagonal Ti martensite (α’) | Martensitic microstructure |
Contact angle measurements.
| Sample | Cotact Angle [°] |
|---|---|
| MP | 74 ± 4 |
| EB10 | 81 ± 4 |
| EB30 | 81 ± 4 |
| EB10HT | 68 ± 3 |
| EB10HTetch | 80 ± 3 |
| P10 | 75 ± 2 |
Figure 4Fibroblast alignment on the different samples after 48 h culture: (a) MP sample; (b) EB10 sample; (c) EB30 sample; (d) EB10HT sample; (e) EB10HT etch sample; (f) P10 sample.
Figure 5Bacterial metabolic activity evaluation (a = 24 h, b = 48 h, c = 72 h) and (d) number count of the viable colonies after 72 h. The bars represent means and standard deviations.