| Literature DB >> 31952215 |
Alicia S Molina1, Mónica A Lugo2, María V Pérez Chaca1, Silvina Vargas-Gil3, Fanny Zirulnik1, Jorge Leporati4, Nuria Ferrol5, Concepción Azcón-Aguilar5.
Abstract
Cadmium is a heavy metal (HM) that inhibits plant growth and leads to death, causing great losses in yields, especially in Cd hyperaccumulator crops such as Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), a worldwide economically important legume. Furthermore, Cd incorporation into the food chain is a health hazard. Oxidative stress (OS) is a plant response to abiotic and biotic stresses with an intracellular burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that causes damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) association is a plant strategy to cope with HM and to alleviate OS. Our aim was to evaluate the mitigation effects of mycorrhization with AMF Rhizophagus intraradices on soybean growth, nutrients, Cd accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and the activity of different antioxidant agents under Cd (0.7-1.2 mg kg-1 bioavailable Cd) induced OS. Our results suggest that glutathione may act as a signal molecule in a defense response to Cd-induced OS, and mycorrhization may avoid Cd-induced growth inhibition and reduce Cd accumulation in roots. It is discussed that R. intraradices mycorrhization would act as a signal, promoting the generation of a soybean cross tolerance response to Cd pollution, therefore evidencing the potential of this AMF association for bioremediation and encouragement of crop development, particularly because it is an interaction between a worldwide cultivated Cd hyperaccumulator plant and an AMF-HM-accumulator commonly present in soils.Entities:
Keywords: Rhizophagus intraradices; glutathione; heavy metal toxicity; mycorrhization; non-protein thiols; plan antioxidant defenses; soybean
Year: 2020 PMID: 31952215 PMCID: PMC7020179 DOI: 10.3390/plants9010108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Mycorrhizal colonization of soybean plants inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices supplemented or not with Cadmium (Cd).
| Treatment | Harvest Time | Root Colonization (%) | Arbuscules (%) | Vesicles (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 66.76 ± 6.21a | 36.75 ± 6.21a | 1.750 ± 1.10a |
|
| 85.66 ± 3.09b | 70.83 ± 5.02b | 35.67 ± 0.80b | |
|
|
| 91.00 ± 3.59b | 72.00 ± 5.1b | 39.33±3.76b 1 |
1 Data are the means of six replicates ± SE for root colonization, arbuscules, and vesicles. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05); data were analyzed by a one way ANOVA with Tukey post-test between treatments.
Soil Cd, P, and Fe contents (ppm of soil) of non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal soybean plants after 40 days of Cd addition.
| Soil Elements Concentration (ppm) | Non-Mycorrhizal Soybean + Cd | Mycorrhizal Soybean+ Cd |
|---|---|---|
| Cd | 10.97 ± 5.06 | 17.72 ± 8.44 |
| P | 529.68 ± 46.3 | 490.53 ± 49.84 |
| Fe | 10375 ± 1742 | 13582 ± 1441 1 |
1 Data are the means of three replicates ± SE for soil Cd, P, and Fe contents. Average values were not significantly different between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal soybean plants; data were analyzed by an unpaired t test (p ≤ 0.05).
Phosphorus, Fe, and Cd concentrations in tissues of non-mycorrhizal (nM) and mycorrhizal (M) soybean plants after 40 days of Cd addition.
| Tissues | P (ppm) | Fe (ppm) | Cd (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nM | M | nM | M | nM | M | |
|
| 2176.66 ± 140.18ac | 2583.33 ± 59.33be | 3884.20 ± 46.83ac | 5181.20 ± 160.57be | 65.52 ± 0.76ac | 30.27 ± 0.50be |
|
| 1187.16 ± 54.87adg | 1980.22 ± 204.9bfi | 158.56 ± 11.88adg | 130.34 ± 29.26afi | 0.726 ± 0.020adg | 1.056 ± 0.076bfi |
|
| 2073.35 ± 15.43ach | 2257.14 ± 173.7aei | 123.85 ± 10.11adg | 79.16 ± 1.15afi | 1.600 ± 0.005adh | 0.740 ± 0.046bfj |
|
| 1630.25 ± 199.7ad | 2118.68 ± 119.95bf | 141.20 ± 10.43ad | 104.75 ± 17.38af | 1.163 ± 0.195ad | 0.898 ± 0.081af 1 |
1 Data are the means of six replicates ± SE for concentrations of P, Fe, and Cd in soybean tissues. *Leaves are the total values obtained by adding each element concentration in old and new leaves of soybean. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 by a one way ANOVA with the Tukey post-test. The first letter indicates nM vs. M significance level for each tissue (letters a–b). The second letter represents the significance level of roots vs. all other tissues in nM (letters c–d) and M plants (letters e–f). The third letter shows the significance level of old leaves vs. new leaves in nM (letters g–h) and M plants (letters i–j).
Figure 1Effect of Cd stress on (a) total fresh weight; (b) root fresh weight; (c) stem length; (d) shoot fresh weight of non-mycorrhizal (nM) and mycorrhizal plants (M) inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices at initial time (t0) and after 40 days (tf) of Cd addition. Data are the means of six replicates ± SE for each dependent variable. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 using a two way ANOVA according to the least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test between treatments.
Figure 2Effect of Cd stress on (a) oxidative damage to lipids [malon-di-aldehyde (MDA) content]; (b) glutathione (GSH) content; (c) peroxidase (APX) activity; (d) non-protein thiols (NPTs) content in leaves of non-mycorrhizal (nM) and mycorrhizal (M) soybean plants inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices at initial time (t0) and after 40 days (tf) of Cd exposure. Data are the means of six replicates ± SE for each dependent variable. Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 using a two way ANOVA to the least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test between treatments.