| Literature DB >> 31950731 |
Valentin Schwarzbach1, Karsten Lenk1, Ulrich Laufs1.
Abstract
AIMS: Abuse of crystal methamphetamine (MA) poses a growing problem for health services worldwide. This review summarizes the current literature on the effects of MA on the cardiovascular system. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Crystal; Europe; Heart failure; Methamphetamine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31950731 PMCID: PMC7160483 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Prevalence of methamphetamine abuse in select German states
| Prevalence of methamphetamine abuse in German states | Lifetime (%) | 12 months (%) | 30 days (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bavaria | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Hamburg | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Hesse | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| NRW | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Thuringia | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Saxonia | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Prevalence is shown in (%) per lifetime, 12 months or 30 days respectively. The eastern states, Thuringia and Saxonia, the latter with a border to Czech Republic, show an increased prevalence compared with the western states. Adapted from de Matos et al. 5
Wastewater analysis of methamphetamine (MA) in select European cities
| City (country) | MA concentration |
|---|---|
| Chemnitz (Germany) | 240.6 |
| Erfurt (Germany) | 211.2 |
| Budweis (Czech Republic) | 2002 |
| Brno (Czech Republic) | 185.7 |
| Dresden (Germany) | 180.2 |
| Bratislava (Slovakia) | 149.2 |
| Nuremberg (Germany) | 94.8 |
| Oslo (Norway) | 92.5 |
| Magdeburg (Germany) | 85.2 |
| Zurich (Switzerland) | 62 |
| Barcelona (Spain) | 49 |
| Helsinki (Finland) | 46 |
| Vilnius (Lithuania) | 39.7 |
| Munich (Germany) | 7.9 |
| Athens (Greece) | 4 |
| Hamburg (Germany) | 3.6 |
| Porto (Portugal) | 0.5 |
| Paris (France) | Below quant. |
Wastewater analysis of average population normalized loads of MA in select European cities (mg per 1000 inhabitants per day). Adapted from.6
Figure 1Wastewater analysis of methamphetamine (MA) in select European cities. The size of the dots corresponds to the concentration of MA (see Table 2)
Figure 2Clinical case report of a patient with frequent MA abuse. A: Chest X‐ray showing cardiomegaly and lung congestion at the time of hospital admission. B: Transthoracic echocardiogram showing LV‐dilatation and moderate to severe secondary mitral regurgitation due to ring dilatation. C: Diastolic 2 chamber and shortaxis views in cardiac MRI showing LV enlargement without signs of myocardial infarction or inflammation and discrete pericardial effusion.
Echocardiographic findings in methamphetamine‐associated cardiomyopathy
| Parameter | Baseline | Continued abuse | Discontinued abuse |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEF (%) | 19 ± 6 | 21 ± 4 | 43 ± 13 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 67.1 ± 7.4 | 68.2 ± 5.5 | 56.1 ± 6.7 |
The initially severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improves to a moderately reduced LVEF in patients with discontinued abuse, while it stays the same in patients who continue abusing methamphetamine. Analogously, there is a notable reduction in LV end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in patients with discontinued abuse, while the LV stays dilated in the continued abuse group. Table adapted from Schuerer et al.16