Literature DB >> 31950204

Elastography in the evaluation of liver allograft.

P J Navin1, M C Olson1, J M Knudsen1, S K Venkatesh2.   

Abstract

Elastography is an established technique in the evaluation of chronic liver diseases. While there is a large clinical experience and data available regarding the performance of elastography in native liver, elastography experience with liver grafts is limited and still growing. Both ultrasound-based elastography techniques and MR Elastography (MRE) are useful in the assessment of liver fibrosis in liver transplants. Technical modifications for performing elastography will be required for optimum evaluation of the graft. In general, caution needs to be exercised regarding the use of elastography immediately following transplantation as post-operative changes, perioperative conditions/complications, inflammation, and rejection can cause increased stiffness in the graft. In the follow-up, detection of increased stiffness with elastography is useful for predicting development of fibrosis in the graft. Adjunctive MRI or ultrasound with Doppler also provides comprehensive evaluation of anatomy, vascular anastomosis and patency, biliary tree, and stiffness for fibrosis. In this review, we provide a brief overview of elastography techniques available followed by the literature review of elastography in the evaluation of grafts and illustration with clinical examples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver grafts; Liver transplants; Magnetic resonance elastography; Shear wave elastography; Transient elastography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31950204     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02400-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  38 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Corlan O Adebajo; Jayant A Talwalkar; John J Poterucha; W Ray Kim; Michael R Charlton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Victoria S Lee; Frank H Miller; Reed A Omary; Yi Wang; Daniel R Ganger; Edward Wang; Sambasiva Rao; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Elastography Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Giovanna Ferraioli; Mark L Palmeri; Zachary D Goodman; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Jonathan Rubin; Brian Garra; Robert P Myers; Stephanie R Wilson; Deborah Rubens; Deborah Levine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Combined Use of MR Fat Quantification and MR Elastography in Living Liver Donors: Can It Reduce the Need for Preoperative Liver Biopsy?

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kwan-Woong Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung Bun Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Zhen Wang; Frank H Miller; Utaroh Motosugi; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Patrick Asbach; Edmund M Godfrey; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Andrew P Keaveny; Mellena Bridges; Anneloes Bohte; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Adverse Events Related to Image-Guided Liver Biopsy.

Authors:  James H Boyum; Thomas D Atwell; Grant D Schmit; John J Poterucha; Cathy D Schleck; W Scott Harmsen; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography in liver transplant recipients: A pooled analysis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Andrew Keaveny; Sharon Adam; Frank H Miller; Patrick Asbach; Edmund M Godfrey; Alvin C Silva; Zhen Wang; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Sumeet K Asrani; David J Lomas; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.400

10.  Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999-2016: observational study.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-18
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 2.  Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Michael C Olson; Anthony E Samir; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-23

Review 3.  Noninvasive markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation - Where do we stand?

Authors:  Ivana Mikolasevic; Sanja Stojsavljevic; Filip Blazic; Maja Mijic; Delfa Radic-Kristo; Toni Juric; Nadija Skenderevic; Mia Klapan; Andjela Lukic; Tajana Filipec Kanizaj
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2021-03-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.