Literature DB >> 31948484

High tuberosity healing rate associated with better functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis.

Jonas Schmalzl1, Malik Jessen2,3, Nadine Sadler2, Lars-Johannes Lehmann2,3, Christian Gerhardt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common treatment for proximal humeral fractures. (PHF) in the elderly. This study evaluates the functional outcome and the influence of. tuberosity healing (TH) following RSA with 135° humeral inclination and a neutral glenosphere without lateralization for PHFs.
METHODS: In this retrospective case series, all patients with an acute PHF treated with primary RSA with 135° humeral inclination and a standard glenosphere without lateralization during a four-year period were followed up. Constant score (CS), patient satisfaction (subjective shoulder value (SSV)), TH and glenoid notching were analyzed.
RESULTS: 38 patients with a mean age of 77 ± 8 years were available for follow-up at 34 ± 5 months. The mean adjusted CS was 61 ± 9 points. TH of the greater tuberosity (GT) was 82% and resulted in significantly improved abduction (117° vs. 81°; P < 0.001), forward flexion (139° vs. 99°; p < 0.001), external rotation (28° vs. 10°; p = 0.002), CS (65 vs. 41 points; p < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (SSV 79% vs. 48%; p < 0.001). TH of the LT was 87% without affecting internal rotation or overall outcome. The complication- and revision rate was 5%; implant survival was 100%. Scapular notching occurred in 3 (8%) cases (all grade 1).
CONCLUSION: RSA with 135° humeral inclination and a standard glenosphere for PHF leads to good functional outcome in combination with a high rate of TH and a low rate of scapular notching. The short-term revision rate is low and the results are predictable and continuous. TH is associated with improved ROM, patient satisfaction and functional outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  135; Humeral inclination; Proximal humeral fracture; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Tuberosity healing

Year:  2020        PMID: 31948484     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-3060-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  5 in total

1.  Does healing of both greater and lesser tuberosities improve functional outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture? A retrospective study of twenty-eight cases with a computed tomography scan at a minimum of one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Stanislas Gunst; Lucie Louboutin; John Swan; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Laurent Nove-Josserand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Maria Körting; Patrick Khourdaji; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  [Fracture analysis, indication for endoprosthesis and implant selection in proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  M Kimmeyer; V Rentschler; J Schmalzl; C Gerhardt; L J Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-14

4.  Clinical results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a comparison between nonporous stems versus trabecular metal stems.

Authors:  Hideyuki Sasanuma; Yuji Iijima; Tomohiro Saito; Yuji Kanaya; Yuichiro Yano; Takashi Fukushima; Sueo Nakama; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  Surgical learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Leanne S Blaas; Jian Z Yuan; Charlotte M Lameijer; Peter M van de Ven; Frank W Bloemers; Robert Jan Derksen
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-10-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.