| Literature DB >> 31948439 |
Gonzalo D Álvarez-Ríos1, Fernando Pacheco-Torres2, Carmen Julia Figueredo-Urbina3, Alejandro Casas1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulque is a fermented beverage prepared with sap of Agave species in Mexico. Management of agaves for this purpose has motivated domestication of some species and high phenotypic variation that commonly causes uncertainty about the taxonomic identity of varieties traditionally managed by people. This study assumed that varieties of crop species continually arise from mutations, sexual reproduction and hybridization, among other processes, and some of them are favoured and maintained by humans. Identifying these varieties may be difficult and a challenging issue for botanists and evolutionary biologists studying processes of domestication. Through a case study, we analysed the traditional varieties of agaves used to produce pulque in Michoacán, Mexico. We aimed at identifying the varieties, analysing the relatedness among them and developing a methodological approach that could help solve taxonomic problems and study variation under domestication of this and other plant groups. We documented (1) the traditional varieties of agave used and their identity, (2) how these varieties are perceived, used and managed by the local people and (3) how management influences phenotypic and genetic variation among varieties.Entities:
Keywords: Domestication; Fermented beverages; Mesoamerica; Pulque agaves; Traditional knowledge
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948439 PMCID: PMC6966820 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-020-0353-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Map of the studied localities, Tarímbaro (T) at the north and Santiago Undameo (SU) at the southwest of the city of Morelia. Units of cultivation of agave where the samples for genetic analysis were collected and morphological measurements of agaves were conducted are indicated as T1–T2 in Tarímbaro and SU1–SU2 in Santiago Undameo
Characteristics of the 11 nuclear microsatellites used in genetics analysis for species domesticated agave in the state of Michoacán, Mexico
| Locus | Flourescents dye | Allele size range (bp) | Multiplex set | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1-5G | NED | 151-169 | 1 | Parker et al. 2014 [ |
| APAR2-12 | VIC | 155-164 | 1 | Lindsay et al. 2012 [ |
| APAR3-11 | 6-FAM | 126-218 | 1 | |
| APARLC20 | PET | 134-158 | 1 | |
| APARLC21 | NED | 246-252 | 1 | |
| APARLC28 | NED | 151-193 | 2 | |
| APARLC34 | PET | 168-174 | 2 | |
| APARLC35 | 6-FAM | 170 | 2 | |
| P1763 | 6-FAM | 176-222 | 3 | Cabrera-Toledo et al. unpublished data |
| P1448 | VIC | 122-158 | 3 | |
| P1659 | PET | 158-178 | 3 |
Fig. 2Traditional varieties of agave used for producing pulque in the state of Michoacán, a Agaves delimiting a field without cultivation (varieties “Listoncillo,” “Blanco” and “Verde”). b Agaves (“Listoncillo”) at the edge of a cornfield. c Agaves (“Verde”) at the edge of a road
Characteristics of the traditional varieties of agaves identified by producers in the state of Michoacán
| Traditional variety name | Main features | Location (measured plants) | Taxonomic identity |
|---|---|---|---|
| It is the most widely used variety, for the quantity and quality of its sap, produces on average 3 L a day, for 4 months and is valued for the high sweetness of its sap. This maguey exceeds 2 m in height, is leafy, with broad leaves and mostly grooved towards the tip, and has lateral spaced teeth and a prominent terminal thorn. Its coloration is an intense green and is very abundant in both locations. | SU and T ( | ||
| It is a variety recognized by the attributes that are similar to “Verde” variety; it is only distinguished because it has a darker green coloration. Just one producer identifies it in SU, the rest do not distinguish between “Verde” and “Negro” variety. | SU (n = 18) | ||
| This variety is little used in SU, so its abundance is reduced, producers say that the sap is not as sweet as Verde variety, but produces more, about four liters on average per day. It is larger and reaches 3 m high; its leaves are thin and long, so they lose rigidity. The lateral teeth are small and seem to disappear. It receives the name of Tarímbaro since according to the producers this variety was brought from that locality. | SU (n = 2) | ||
| This variety is not abundant in SU, only two individuals were registered. It is little used since it is affirmed that the sap is insipid and the produced pulque is not so good. This variety has a grayish appearance, hence the name "Cenizo." It is smaller than other varieties, and it does not reach 2 m high, with small erect leaves; it has big lateral teeth with a hook shape. It produces one and a half liters per day. | SU (n = 2) | Most probably | |
| Its characteristics are the same as “Tarímbaro” variety. People name it “Listoncillo,” because of its length, it is thin, and its fallen leaves, which resemble a ribbon. Producers also claim that their sap is less sweet than “Verde” variety, it gives 4 L on average per day for five months. In T, it is as abundant as “Verde” variety; it is common to find exclusive accumulations of this variety. | T (n = 27) | ||
| It is a grayish variety, with slightly grooved and erect leaves. It exceeds two meters in height, its lateral teeth are hooked and has a big terminal spine. It is less used than “ | T (n = 2) | ||
| It is a grayish agave, with slightly flat and erect leaves that have a peculiar widening in the middle part. It is about 2 m high, without being leafy. They are particularly fibrous, as a person interviewed said "they are very hard, they are like reeds," hence their name. It has hooked lateral teeth. Its sap is very sweet at the beginning of production, but after a month and a half or 2 months, according to people interviewed, it becomes insipid "it becomes like water". This is the variety that is in lowest proportion in T. It produces one and a half liters per day. | T (n = 4) |
SU Santiago Undameo, T Tarímbaro, *according to Gentry 1982
Fig. 3Traditional varieties of pulque agaves from the localities of Santiago Undameo and Tarímbaro, Michoacán. a Verde: Agave salmiana var. salmiana; b Negro: A. salmiana var. salmiana; c Tarímbaro: A. mapisaga var. mapisaga; d Listoncillo: A. mapisaga var. mapisaga; e Blanco: A. aff. americana; f Carrizaleño: Most probably A. americana subsp. americana; g Cenizo: Most probably A. americana var. americana
Fig. 4Management practices in Tarímbaro and Santiago Undameo, Michoacán. a Cultivation of agaves put in line, one year after transplantation. b Start of sap extraction process, the producer cuts the “heart” (central stem) of a mature agave. c The cut stem (maguey’s heart). d Cavity excavated (cajete) in the centre of the agave, where sap will accumulate. e Cavity covered with leaves of the same agave. f Cavity uncovered with accumulated sap. g Sap collection. h Scraping of the agave cavity in order to make the sap flows. i Sap fermentation in plastic barrels. j Pulque sale outside the producer’s home
Fig. 5Principal components analysis (PCA) according to the 20 morphological variables measured in the seven traditional varieties of Agave in the studied localities in the state of Michoacán. The varieties “Tarímbaro” and “Listoncillo” form the red circle group. The varieties “Verde” and “Negro” are enclosed in the green circle group and “Carrizaleño,” “Cenizo” and “Blanco” in the blue circle group
Vegetative morphological characteristics and genetic diversity of the seven traditional varieties of agaves, identified by producers in the localities of Santiago Undameo and Tarímbaro, Michoacán
| Vegetative character | Most probably | PC1 | PC2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General plant lenght (GPL) | 209.18 ± 4.12a | 214.17 ± 5.87a | 269.00 ± 11.00ab | 274.68 ± 4.31b | 238.00 ± 12.00ab | 167.00 ± 13.00a | 218.00 ± 10.17ab | 0.264 | 0.115 |
| Stem lenght (SL) | 74.06 ± 3.63a | 80.44 ± 3.67ab | 67.50 ± 2.50abc | 66.00 ± 2.36bc | 55.00 ± 7.00abc | 50.50 ± 5.50abc | 46.25 ± 3.12c | − 0.075 | 0.419 |
| Mean diameter of the plant (D) | 296.82 ± 12.31ac | 294.06 ± 8.28ac | 411.75 ± 42.25b | 363.57 ± 13.88b | 392.00 ± 9.50b | 266.25 ± 3.75 ac | 257.63 ± 18.90c | 0.181 | 0.171 |
| Leaf lenght (LL) | 153.21 ± 3.66a | 137.06 ± 5.79a | 203.00 ± 19.00ab | 229.32 ± 3.74b | 168.50 ± 2.50ab | 125.50 ± 9.50a | 167.75 ± 6.28ab | 0.305 | − 0.005 |
| Leaf width at middle (LW) | 26.50 ± 0.40a | 27.17 ± 0.63a | 24.00 ± 0.00ab | 22.69 ± 0.46b | 29.50 ± 0.50ab | 21.50 ± 0.50ab | 27.75 ± 2.29ab | − 0.208 | 0.038 |
| LL/LW | 5.79 ± 0.12a | 5.10 ± 0.24a | 8.46 ± 0.79ab | 10.26 ± 0.30b | 5.71 ± 0.01ab | 5.85 ± 0.58ab | 6.18 ± 0.58ab | 0.306 | − 0.009 |
| LL/SL | 2.12 ± 0.07a | 1.75 ± 0.10abc | 3.02 ± 0.39abcd | 3.57 ± 0.10c | 3.11 ± 0.35abcd | 2.49 ± 0.08abcd | 3.68 ± 0.31d | 0.253 | − 0.276 |
| Terminal thorn length (TTL) | 7.30 ± 0.24a | 6.87 ± 0.18a | 3.88 ± 0.12abc | 3.29 ± 0.07b | 4.13 ± 0.62abc | 3.34 ± 0.34abc | 3.26 ± 0.11c | − 0.263 | 0.226 |
| Terminal thorn width at the base (TTW) | 1.09 ± 0.03a | 1.17 ± 0.04ad | 0.57 ± 0.01b | 0.70 ± 0.02cb | 1.13 ± 0.12abcd | 0.65 ± 0.02abcd | 0.68 ± 0.03bcd | − 0.246 | 0.179 |
| TTL/TTW | 6.75 ± 0.28a | 6.00 ± 0.28a | 6.81 ± 0.03ab | 4.78 ± 0.14b | 3.76 ± 0.96ab | 5.18 ± 0.65ab | 4.85 ± 0.25ab | − 0.152 | 0.174 |
| TTL/LL | 0.05 ± 0.00 a | 0.05 ± 0.00 a | 0.02 ± 0.00 ab | 0.01 ± 0.00 b | 0.03 ± 0.00 ab | 0.03 ± 0.00 ab | 0.02 ± 0.00 ab | - 0.277 | 0.197 |
| Total number of teeth (TEET) | 38.94 ± 3.39 a | 33.50 ± 1.07 a | 65.50 ± 1.50 ab | 79.19 ± 2.56 b | 37.00 ± 1.00 ab | 36.50 ± 3.50 ab | 35.75 ± 1.80 a | 0.296 | 0.065 |
| TEET/LL | 0.26 ± 0.02 ac | 0.27 ± 0.01 ac | 0.33 ± 0.02 ab | 0.35 ± 0.01 b | 0.22 ± 0.00 abc | 0.29 ± 0.01 abc | 0.21 ± 0.01 c | - 0.025 | 0.131 |
| Number of teeth in 10 cm2 (TEE10) | 3.00 ± 0.17 ac | 3.11 ± 0.11 ac | 4.00 ± 1.00 ab | 4.03 ± 0.26 ab | 2.00 ± 0.00 c | 3.00 ± 0.00 abcd | 2.50 ± 0.29 cd | 0.159 | 0.188 |
| Teeth length (LTEE) | 1.45 ± 0.06a | 1.82 ± 0.07abc | 1.06 ± 0.28abc | 1.32 ± 0.07bc | 2.39 ± 0.06abc | 1.19 ± 0.05abc | 1.00 ± 0.25c | − 0.160 | 0.164 |
| LTEE/LL | 0.01 ± 0.0001ab | 0.014 ± 0.002bd | 0.005 ± 0.001abcd | 0.006 ± 0.00c | 0.014 ± 0.00abcd | 0.01 ± 0.002abcd | 0.006 ± 0.002d | − 0.237 | 0.150 |
| Teeth width (WTEE) | 0.58 ± 0.04a | 0.57 ± 0.02a | 0.31 ± 0.07ab | 0.32 ± 0.02 b | 0.80 ± 0.08a | 0.60 ± 0.11ab | 0.70 ± 0.08a | − 0.259 | − 0.211 |
| LTEE/WTEE | 2.64 ± 0.19abc | 3.25 ± 0.11 ac | 3.38 ± 0.16abc | 4.20 ± 0.18 b | 3.00 ± 0.23abc | 2.05 ± 0.30abc | 1.54 ± 0.51abc | 0.175 | 0.278 |
| Distance between teeth (DTEE) | 2.05 ± 0.14a | 1.78 ± 0.11a | 1.16 ± 0.29ab | 1.15 ± 0.09b | 3.02 ± 0.25ab | 3.33 ± 0.61ab | 4.41 ± 0.65a | − 0.156 | − 0.440 |
| DTEE/LL | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 0.01 ± 0.00ab | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.02 ± 0.00ab | 0.03 ± 0.01a | 0.03 ± 0.00a | − 0.225 | − 0.360 |
| Effective number of alleles (AE) | 2.230 ± 0.273 | 2.183 ± 0.313 | 2.079 ± 0.166 | 2.739 ± 0.261 | 1.661 ± 0.321 | 1.667 ± 0.389 | 2.316 ± 0.397 | ||
| Observed heterozygosity (HO) | 0.602 ± 0.120 | 0.586 ± 0.118 | 0.682 ± 0.102 | 0.645 ± 0.108 | 0.364 ± 0.136 | 0.364 ± 0.136 | 0.439 ± 0.128 | ||
| Expected heterozygosity (HE) | 0.473 ± 0.070 | 0.445 ± 0.075 | 0.477 ± 0.055 | 0.583 ± 0.062 | 0.295 ± 0.090 | 0.364 ± 0.090 | 0.403 ± 0.102 | ||
Mean value ± standard error. The measures are in cm, except TEET and TEE10, which are counts. The letters are paired comparison. The last columns show eigenvectors of the first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal components according to PCA
Fig. 6a Classification of varieties of A. salamiana var. salmiana, A. mapisaga var. mapisaga and most probably A. americana var. americana using Cluster analysis by UPGMA method based in Nei’s [55] genetic distance with 10 microsatellite loci. b Bayesian clustering in STRUCTURE, the K = 4 using the method described by Evanno et al., [56]. Each individual plant is represented by one vertical line with K segments coloured proportionally to their belonging to a genetic cluster