| Literature DB >> 27446061 |
Adelfo Escalante1, David R López Soto1, Judith E Velázquez Gutiérrez2, Martha Giles-Gómez3, Francisco Bolívar1, Agustín López-Munguía1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; aguamiel; dextran; fructans; lactic acid bacteria; maguey; probiotics; pulque
Year: 2016 PMID: 27446061 PMCID: PMC4928461 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Agave species used for .
| Accepted | Cultured mainly in the states of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Puebla | Alfaro Rojas et al., | |
| Synonym | Cultured mainly in the states of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Puebla | Alfaro Rojas et al., | |
| Accepted | Cultured mainly in the states of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Puebla | Alfaro Rojas et al., | |
| A. | Accepted | Include 13 variants. Cultured mainly in the states of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Puebla | Alfaro Rojas et al., |
| Accepted | Cultured mainly in the states of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo y Puebla | Alfaro Rojas et al., | |
| Accepted | Include three variants | Mora-López et al., | |
| Unresolved name | The most diverse group including 31 variants | Mora-López et al., |
The Plant List (.
Figure 1Traditional . The traditional process involves four common steps: (A) Castration of the mature plant by cutting the floral bud and make the pit (cajete). (B) Pit scraping to promote aguamiel accumulation and sap extraction. (C) Seed preparation. (D) Fermentation. For details of the castration process see Supplementary Files 1, 2.
Figure 2. (A) Tlachiquero extracting freshly aguamiel with an acocote (Hidalgo state). (B) Aguamiel is transferred into a plastic container for transportation to the tinacal (Morelos state). (C) Freshly collected aguamiel appearance (Morelos state). (D) Aguamiel accumulated in cajete previous to the twice-daily extraction (Hidalgo state). (E) Aguamiel pouring into a plastic vat for seed preparation (Hidalgo state). (F) Fermented pulque in a plastic vat (Hidalgo state). (G) Fermented pulque in a traditional leather vat (Hidalgo state). (H) Serving pulque for direct consumption from the fermentation vat (Tlaxcala state). Note the characteristic filament associated to final product viscosity.
Physicochemical characteristics of .
| pH | 6.6 | 7.5 | 4.5 | Secretaría de Economía, | |
| Density (°Bé) | 5 | 7 | 4.5 | ||
| Refractive index (immersion, 20°C) | 59 | 100 | 27 | ||
| Total solids | 13 | 17 | 7 | ||
| Total reducing sugars | 8 | 12 | 6 | ||
| Direct reducing sugars | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Gums | 2 | 6 | 0.2 | ||
| Proteins | 300 | 600 | 100 | ||
| Ashes | 300 | 430 | 100 | ||
| Total acidity | 0.9 | 1.03 | 4 | ||
| Refractive index (immersion, 20°C) | 32 | 35 | 25 | ND | Secretaría de Economía, |
| Refractive index (Abbé, 20°C) | 1.3390 | 1.3406 | 1.3365 | 1.3380 | |
| pH | >3.7 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 4 | |
| Total acidity | 0.4 | 0.75 | 0.4 | 0.7 | |
| Total reducing sugars | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | |
| Alcoholic degree (%/vol) | 6 | 9 | 4 | 6 | |
mg/100 mL, ND, non-defined. °Bé, Baumé degrees.
Figure 3Microbial, metabolic and physicochemical changes during . Proposed microbial, physicochemical and metabolic changes during pulque fermentation as described by Escalante et al. (2008). (A) Total CFU/mL counts for yeasts; (B) Total mesophilic aerobes (TMA); (C) LAB determined during 6 h fermentation in laboratory; (D) Sugar consumption expressed as mM hexose equivalent; (E) Fermentation products (ethanol, lactic acid, and acetic acid) expressed as mM C; (F) Cultivable diversity (% of four most abundant isolates); (G) Culture-independent diversity (% of four most abundant 16S rDNA clones); (H) Scanning electron micrograph corresponding to pulque fermentation after 6 h showing some yeast and short cocci chains (T6) (non-previously published photograph); (I) Aguamiel accumulated in cajete; (J) Fermented pulque. AM, aguamiel, T0, T3, and T6, the start of the fermentation, 3 and 6 h of cultivation, respectively. Ama, Acetobacter malorum; Ara, Acinetobacter radioresistens; Eag, Enterobacter aglomerans; Erh, Erwinia rhapontici; Ent, Enterobacter sp.; Kas, Kluyvera ascorbata; Lbh, homofermentative Lactobacillus sp.; Lbs. Lactobacillus sp.; Lac, L. acidophilus; Lla, Lactococcus lactis; Lme, Leuconostoc mesenteroides; Lci, L. citreum; Lki, L. kimchi; Sce, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Zmo, Zymomonas mobilis; Uba, Uncultured bacterial clone.
Figure 4Metabolic traits of main microbial groups present in . Main metabolic traits comprise homo- and heterofermentative lactic acid metabolism by LAB. Production of ethanol by Saccharomyces, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, and Z. mobilis. Acetic acid metabolism. Extracellular polysaccharide synthesis resulting in the synthesis of dextran and levan polymers by Leuconostoc sp. and Z. mobilis (levan). Microorganisms and metabolic pathways involved in the amino acid production, vitamins, and some antimicrobial compounds remain to be determined. Functional properties such as prebiotic and probiotic activities are related to fructooligosaccharide content in aguamiel and pulque or produced by LAB such as Leuconostoc sp. Probiotic properties are related to diverse LAB identified as Lactobacillus sp. and Leuconostoc sp.
Microbial diversity detected in .
| Essential microorganisms responsible for acid (lactic acid), alcoholic and production of EPS | Sánchez-Marroquín and Hope, | ||
| Yeasts isolated from | Several isolates of | Estrada-Godina et al., | |
| Essential microorganisms responsible for lactic and acetic fermentation (LAB and acetic acid bacteria), alcoholic fermentation ( | Lappe-Oliveras et al., | ||
| Analysis of 16S rDNA clone libraries allowed to identify | Homofermentative | Escalante et al., | |
| A combined culture dependent and 16S rDNA libraries approach allowed to identify those microorganisms present in freshly collected | Escalante et al., |
(+) Indicates killer activity detected.
Identified from a culture isolate.
Identified from 16S rDNA clone library.
Identified by culture and non-culture dependent approaches.
Probiotic assessment of LAB isolated from .
| This isolate strain showed 60% relative survival after acid exposition (pH 1.5), and 50–55% relative survival to simulated gastric acid exposition (pH 2.0). Bile tolerance to 0.3% taourocholic acid < 80%. Incubation conditions assayed: 4 h, 37° | Resistance to cefepime antibiotic, higher activity of bile salt hydrolase in MRS supplemented with 0.5% of taourocholic acid (671.72 U/mg protein) | González-Vázquez et al., | |
| Isolates showed < 50% survival to acid exposition (pH 2, 3 h, 37°C). Bile tolerance to 0.5% oxgall (4 h, 37°C) | All strains showed resistance to dicloxacillin, pefloxacin, trimethoprim, ceftazidime antibiotics. | Castro-Rodríguez et al., | |
| Two assayed strains showed >80% survival to lysozyme exposition. Three assayed strains showed > 80% survival to both acid pH (2.5) and 0.3% bile salts exposition. Exposition conditions assayed: 3 h, 37°C | Low binding capacity to HT-29 cells (~0.3%, best result) and to HT-29-MTX cells (10.78%, best result). In both assays, the binding capacity of isolated LAB was higher than control strain ( | Torres-Maravilla et al., | |
| Resistant to an | Capable of dissociating conjugated bile salts by the presence of diverse bile salt hydrolases. Some isolates were resistant to dicloxacillin, pefloxacin and ceftazidime antibiotics. The isolated strain of | Reyes-Naya et al., | |
| Resistance to lysozyme exposition 70% (2 h, 37°C). 100% resistance to 0.3% and 1% bile salts exposition (4 h, 37°C). ~75% resistance to acid exposition (pH 2.5, 5 h, 37°C). This strain showed remarkable resistance to combined acid (pH 2.5) and bile salt (0.3%) exposition for 24 h, 37°C | Giles-Gómez et al., |
Serum alanine transferase.
Lipopolysaccharide + D-Galactosamine.