| Literature DB >> 31947745 |
Valérie Gagné-Ouellet1, Edith Breton1, Kathrine Thibeault1, Carol-Ann Fortin1, Andres Cardenas2, Renée Guérin1,3, Patrice Perron4,5, Marie-France Hivert4,6,7, Luigi Bouchard1,3,5.
Abstract
Changes in fetal DNA methylation (DNAm) of the leptin (LEP) gene have been associated with exposure to maternal hyperglycemia, but their links with childhood obesity risk are still unclear. We investigated the association between maternal hyperglycemia, placental LEP DNAm (25 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' (CpG) sites), neonatal leptinemia, and adiposity (i.e., BMI and skinfold thickness (ST) (subscapular (SS) + triceps (TR) skinfold measures, and the ratio of SS:TR) at 3-years-old, in 259 mother-child dyads, from Gen3G birth cohort. We conducted multivariate linear analyses adjusted for gestational age at birth, sex of the child, age at follow-up, and cellular heterogeneity. We assessed the causal role of DNAm in the association between maternal glycemia and childhood outcomes, using mediation analysis. We found three CpGs associated with neonatal leptinemia (p ≤ 0.002). Of these, cg05136031 and cg15758240 were also associated with BMI (β = -2.69, p = 0.05) and fat distribution (β = -0.581, p = 0.05) at 3-years-old, respectively. Maternal glycemia was associated with DNAm at cg15758240 (β = -0.01, p = 0.04) and neonatal leptinemia (β = 0.19, p = 0.004). DNAm levels at cg15758240 mediates 0.8% of the association between maternal glycemia and neonatal leptinemia (p < 0.001). Our results support that DNAm regulation of the leptin pathway in response to maternal glycemia might be involved in programming adiposity in childhood.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; childhood obesity; epigenetics; fetal programming; maternal hyperglycemia; pregnancy; skinfolds thickness
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947745 PMCID: PMC6982090 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Clinical characteristics of the mother–child dyads from the Genetics of Glucose regulation in Gestation and Growth (Gen3G) cohort.
| Participant Clinical Data | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 1st trimester of pregnancy | |
| Age (years) | 28.6 ± 4.2 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.5 ± 5.5 |
| Smoking during pregnancy | |
| Yes | 7.4% |
| No | 91.8% |
| Glucose 1 h post 50 g GCT (mmol/l) | 5.0 ± 2.2 |
| 2nd trimester of pregnancy | |
| Fasting Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.2 ± 0.3 |
| Glucose 2 h post 75 g OGTT (mmol/L) | 5.9 ± 1.4 |
|
| |
| At birth | |
| Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 39.6 ± 1.0 |
| Sex | |
| Boys | 55% |
| Girls | 45% |
| Birthweight (kg) | 3.4 ± 0.4 |
| Cord blood leptin levels (ng/mL) | 15,028 ± 12,791 |
| At 3-years-old | |
| Age (months) | 40.5 ± 3.0 |
| Weight (kg) | 15.2 ± 1.7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.1 ± 1.2 |
| BMI z-scores | 0.5 ± 0.9 |
| Sum of skinfolds thicknesses (mm)α | 17.5 ± 3.6 |
| Ratio of skinfold thicknesses (SS:TR)α | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
BMI: Body mass index; GCT: glucose challenge test; OGTT; OGTT: Oral glucose tolerance test; SS: Suprascapular; TR: Tricipital. n = 259.
Correlations between placental Leptin (LEP) DNA methylation levels and cord blood leptinemia.
| CpG Sites from the MethylationEPIC BeadChip | Cord Blood Leptin Levels |
|---|---|
| cg15758240 | |
| cg00011113 | |
| cg05136031 | |
| Mean for cg12782180, cg19594666, cg11045943, cg26814075, cg13381984 | |
| cg00666422 | |
| cg20564991 | |
| cg23381058 | |
| cg18603538 | |
| cg04833007 |
Cpg: 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′. Results statistically significant after Bonferroni adjustment (p < 0.05/9 = 0.006).
Associations between placental LEP DNA methylation levels and markers of childhood adiposity.
| CpG Sites | BMI z-Scores | Sum of Skinfold Thickness | Ratio of Skinfold Thickness |
|---|---|---|---|
| cg15758240 | β = −0.391 | β = 9.076 | β = −0.581 |
| cg05136031 | β = −2.687 | β = −1.441 | β = −0.083 |
| cg23341058 | β = 0.019 | β = 3.407 | β = 0.015 |
The sum of skinfold thickness was computed with SS + TR, whereas the ratio is SS:TR. Significant results when p ≤ 0.05. All models were adjusted for gestational age at delivery, sex of the offspring, age at follow-up, and cellular heterogeneity.
Figure 1Associations between placental LEP DNA methylation (DNAm) and childhood adiposity. Linear regressions were applied to assess the relation between LEP DNAm levels at (A) cg05136031 and BMI z-scores; and (B) cg15758240 and the skinfold thickness ratio (SS:TR), a marker of fat distribution. All p-values are adjusted for gestational age at delivery, sex of the offspring, age at follow-up (for skinfold thicknesses) and cell-types composition using ReFACTor. DNAm levels are shown between 0 and 1.
Associations between placental LEP DNA methylation levels and maternal glycemia during pregnancy.
| CpG Sites | Maternal Glucose 1 h Post 50 g GCT at 1st Trimester of Pregnancy | Maternal Fasting Glucose at 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy | Maternal Glucose 2 h Post 75 g OGTT at 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy |
|---|---|---|---|
| cg15758240 | β < 0.001 | β = −0.013 | β < 0.001 |
| cg05136031 | β < 0.001 | Β < 0.001 | Β < 0.001 |
Significant results when p ≤ 0.05. Models were adjusted for maternal age and BMI at 1st trimester of pregnancy, gestational age at delivery, sex of the child, age at follow-up, and placenta heterogeneity.
Figure 2Mediation analysis between maternal fasting glucose at the second trimester of pregnancy, placental LEP DNA methylation (DNAm) variations, and neonatal leptin concentrations. Path a is the relationship between maternal glycemia and DNAm levels at cg15758240, while path b shows the association between DNAm variations and cord blood leptin levels. Path is the indirect relationship between maternal glycemia and offspring leptinemia, and c′ is the direct effect of this relationship when taking into account the placental LEP DNAm signature. Gestational age at delivery, sex of the offspring, maternal age and BMI at 1st trimester of pregnancy, and cell-type composition were all included as covariates.
Figure 3Schematic representation of the LEP gene and localization of the epigenotyped CpG sites. The gray square identifies the CpG sites analyzed as a region. * p < 0.05; ** p > 0.01.