| Literature DB >> 31947612 |
Bishal Khatiwada1,2, Mafruha T Hasan1,2, Angela Sun1,2, Karthik Shantharam Kamath1,2,3, Mehdi Mirzaei1,2,3, Anwar Sunna1,2, Helena Nevalainen1,2.
Abstract
The E. gracilis Zm-strain lacking chloroplasts, characterized in this study, was compared with the earlier assessed wild type Z-strain to explore the role of chloroplasts in heavy metal accumulation and tolerance. Comparison of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values indicated that both strains tolerated similar concentrations of mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb), but cadmium (Cd) tolerance of the Z-strain was twice that of the Zm-strain. The ability of the Zm-strain to accumulate Hg was higher compared to the Z-strain, indicating the existence of a Hg transportation and accumulation mechanism not depending on the presence of chloroplasts. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed maximum accumulation of Hg in the cytosol of the Zm-strain and highest accumulation of Cd in the chloroplasts of the Z-strain indicating a difference in the ability of the two strains to deposit heavy metals in the cell. The highly abundant heavy metal transporter MTP2 in the Z-strain may have a role in Cd transportation to the chloroplasts. A multidrug resistance-associated protein highly increased in abundance in the Zm-strain could be a potential Hg transporter to either cytosol or mitochondria. Overall, the chloroplasts appear to have major role in the tolerance and accumulation of Cd in E. gracilis.Entities:
Keywords: Euglena gracilis; SWATH-MS; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM); heavy metal accumulation; mercury accumulator; microalga
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947612 PMCID: PMC7023027 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8010115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Workflow of SWATH-MS. The empirical ion/spectral library was generated by IDA-MS. SWATH acquisition enabled comparison of the spectra to the spectral library and label-free relative quantification of proteins. The relative abundance of proteins was compared between heavy metal treated and untreated control samples. Statistical analysis was performed as stated in Section 2.9.
Figure 2E. gracilis strains visualized under the light microscope and fluorescence microscope. Red fluorescence from the chlorophyll in the chloroplasts appears only in the Z-strain.
Figure 3The effect of heavy metals Hg (a), Cd (b) and Pb (c) on the growth of the E. gracilis Zm- strain. The graph shows the relative growth of cells against a varying concentration of heavy metals. Error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from biological triplicate samples. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is indicated by the red circle.
Figure 4E. gracilis Zm-strain treated with different heavy metals: (a) Hg, (b) Cd and (c) Pb. CHg, CCd and CPb were untreated controls. Heavy metal accumulation per gram of dry weight of each sample was measured between day 2 and 7 by MP-AES. Error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from the biological triplicate samples.
Figure 5Visualization of heavy metal accumulation in E. gracilis strains using transmission electron microscope (TEM). (a) Z-strain control- untreated cell; (b) Zm-strain control- untreated cell; (c): Z-strain exposed to Hg; (d): Zm-strain exposed to Hg; (e): Z-strain exposed to Cd; (f): Zm-strain exposed to Cd; (g): Z-strain exposed to Pb; (h): Zm-strain exposed to Pb. P: Paramylon; N; nucleus, M; mitochondria, Ch; chloroplast. Black dots represent heavy metal inclusion and are marked by a red arrow. The 4 µm bar corresponds to all images.
Summary of proteins identified from E. gracilis Zm-strain. Triplicates were used for all experiments.
| Heavy Metal Exposure | Differentially Abundant Proteins * | Increased in Abundance (>1.5 FC *) | Decreased in Abundance (<1.5 FC *) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 141 | 63 | 78 |
|
| 100 | 64 | 36 |
|
| 143 | 51 | 92 |
* (FC) Fold change ±1.5, t-test p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6Venn diagram comparing the differentially abundant proteins between E. gracilis Z-and Zm-strains when treated with the heavy metal Hg (a), Cd (b), and Pb (c). The intersection of the sets represents the differentially abundant proteins common to both strains for the respective heavy metal treatment.
Figure 7Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of the differentially abundant proteins of the E. gracilis Z- and Zm- strains treated with the heavy metal Cd, Hg, and Pb (one metal at a time). The results were collated into three sets: (a) Molecular function, (b) Cellular component and (c) Biological process.
Figure 8GO annotation of the proteins increased in abundance (fold change ±1.5, p < 0.05) in E. gracilis Z- and Zm- strains treated with the heavy metals Cd, Hg, and Pb. The proteins were categorized into different sets and denoted by bars specified with numbers (normalized to the total number).
The highly abundant transporters (FC > 2) during the Cd, Hg, and Pb treatments in E. gracilis Z- and Zm-strains.
| UniProt ID | Transporter | Heavy Metal | Fold Change |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| F1DB26 | Multidrug resistance-associated protein_2 | Hg | 11.82 |
| A0A2R5GHD4 | Copper-transporting ATPase RAN1 | Hg | 7.59 |
| Q9XIE2 | ABC transporter G family member 36 | Cd | 4.52 |
| D0P1Q1 | Transmembrane transporter | Cd | 2.02 |
|
| |||
| D7LF89 | Heavy metal transporter MTP2 | Cd | 5.61 |
| Q9XIE2 | ABC transporter G family member 36 | Hg | 4.41 |
| Q8H384 | Cadmium/zinc-transporting ATPase | Cd/Pb | 3.64/2.45 |
| A0A1F3CY04 | Copper-translocating P-type ATPase | Cd | 3.60 |
| D7FUC2 | Ion transmembrane transporter activity | Cd | 3.46 |
| A0A1A0FLX3 | Potassium transporter TrkA | Cd | 3.36 |
| W2ZAX1 | Cation-transporting ATPase activity | Cd | 3.25 |
| K8EBM6 | Proton-transporting ATP synthase activity | Cd | 2.95 |
| A0A1E4SU43 | Mitochondrial carrier family | Cd | 2.87 |
| Q6BZ66 | Transmembrane transporter | Cd | 2.80 |
| A0A140AY28 | Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase | Cd | 2.73 |
| K4ENZ7 | Calcium-transporting ATPase | Cd | 2.62 |
| A0A261XUE4 | Cation-transporting ATPase activity | Cd | 2.50 |
| Q9XIE2 | ABC transporter G family member 36 | Hg | 2.41 |
| V4AGW4 | Extracellular ligand-gated ion channel | Cd | 2.34 |
| E6Y2N7 | ATP: ADP antiporter activity | Cd | 2.28 |
| E1B2R7 | ATP-binding cassette sub-family | Cd | 2.26 |
| Q9XIE2 | ABC transporter G family member 36 | Cd | 2.20 |
| Q4DK78 | V-type proton ATPase subunit a | Cd | 2.00 |
The chloroplast related proteins increased in abundance in the Z-strain treated with Cd.
| Entry | Protein Name | Fold Change |
|---|---|---|
| Q39725 | Light-harvesting chlorophyll a /b binding protein of PSII | 15.35 |
| A4QPI2 | Chloroplast light-harvesting complex II protein | 8.17 |
| A8HPC6 | Chloroplast light-harvesting complex I protein | 6.63 |
| P12356 | Photosystem I reaction center subunit III | 5.99 |
| A0A061RZ43 | Proton gradient regulation 5 | 4.47 |
| Q8GZR2 | Cytochrome f, chloroplastic | 4.28 |
| A8JH60 | Predicted protein chloroplastic | 2.92 |
| Q06SJ8 | Photosystem I assembly protein Ycf3 | 2.84 |
| A8IRG9 | Predicted protein chloroplastic | 1.81 |