Santu Bera1, Bin Xue2, Pavel Rehak3, Guy Jacoby4, Wei Ji1, Linda J W Shimon5, Roy Beck4, Petr Král3,6, Yi Cao2, Ehud Gazit1. 1. School of Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences , Tel Aviv University , Ramat Aviv 69978 , Israel. 2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Department of Physics , Nanjing University , Nanjing , Jiangsu 210093 , People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Chemistry , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois 60607 , United States. 4. The Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 69978 , Israel. 5. Department of Chemical Research Support , Weizmann Institute of Science , Rehovot 76100 , Israel. 6. Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois 60607 , United States.
Abstract
Most natural biomolecules may exist in either of two enantiomeric forms. Although in nature, amino acid biopolymers are characterized by l-type homochirality, incorporation of d-amino acids in the design of self-assembling peptide motifs has been shown to significantly alter enzyme stability, conformation, self-assembly behavior, cytotoxicity, and even therapeutic activity. However, while functional metabolite assemblies are ubiquitous throughout nature and play numerous important roles including physiological, structural, or catalytic functions, the effect of chirality on the self-assembly nature and function of single amino acids is not yet explored. Herein, we investigated the self-assembly mechanism of amyloid-like structure formation by two aromatic amino acids, phenylalanine (Phe) and tryptophan (Trp), both previously found as extremely important for the nucleation and self-assembly of aggregation-prone peptide regions into functional structures. Employing d-enantiomers, we demonstrate the critical role that amino acid chirality plays in their self-assembly process. The kinetics and morphology of pure enantiomers is completely altered upon their coassembly, allowing to fabricate different nanostructures that are mechanically more robust. Using diverse experimental techniques, we reveal the different molecular arrangement and self-assembly mechanism of the dl-racemic mixtures that resulted in the formation of advanced supramolecular materials. This study provides a simple yet sophisticated engineering model for the fabrication of attractive materials with bionanotechnological applications.
Most natural biomolecules may exist in either of two enantiomeric forms. Although in nature, amino acid biopolymers are characterized by l-type homochirality, incorporation of d-amino acids in the design of self-assembling peptide motifs has been shown to significantly alter enzyme stability, conformation, self-assembly behavior, cytotoxicity, and even therapeutic activity. However, while functional metabolite assemblies are ubiquitous throughout nature and play numerous important roles including physiological, structural, or catalytic functions, the effect of chirality on the self-assembly nature and function of single amino acids is not yet explored. Herein, we investigated the self-assembly mechanism of amyloid-like structure formation by two aromatic amino acids, phenylalanine (Phe) and tryptophan (Trp), both previously found as extremely important for the nucleation and self-assembly of aggregation-prone peptide regions into functional structures. Employing d-enantiomers, we demonstrate the critical role that amino acid chirality plays in their self-assembly process. The kinetics and morphology of pure enantiomers is completely altered upon their coassembly, allowing to fabricate different nanostructures that are mechanically more robust. Using diverse experimental techniques, we reveal the different molecular arrangement and self-assembly mechanism of the dl-racemic mixtures that resulted in the formation of advanced supramolecular materials. This study provides a simple yet sophisticated engineering model for the fabrication of attractive materials with bionanotechnological applications.
Metabolites
are the simplest
building blocks utilized by biological systems, performing a multitude
of functions.[1] The propensity of metabolites
to self-assemble into distinct nanostructures displaying diverse material
properties is abundant in nature.[2] Inspired
by nature, mimicking the naturally occurring processes of metabolites’
self-assembly into distinct structure is now considered to be a promising
approach to achieve revolutionary advances in the design and fabrication
of attractive functional materials.[1,3] Similar to
protein amyloids, self-assembly of amyloid fiber forming single amino
acids has been explored to design exciting biomaterials.[4−6] Aromatic amino acids such as Phe, Trp, Tyr, and His are reported
to form a wide range of nanostructures including fibers, nanotubes,
nanoribbons, twisted nanosheets, dendritic structures, etc., depending on the self-assembly conditions.[5,6] Apart
from morphological diversity, a recent report showed the efficiently
dense packing of β-Gly crystals along certain crystallographic
planes provided a high piezoelectric voltage constant, higher than
the voltage produced by any currently used ceramic and polymeric materials.[7] Nonpolar centrosymmetric crystals of α-Gly
have been demonstrated to exhibit surface pyroelectricity.[8,9] Recently, our group has revealed the intrinsic fluorescence properties
of amyloid-like structures fabricated by single amino acids.[10] The formation, dynamics, and cellular distribution
of supramolecular chromophores were detected without the use of an
external dye. However, due to their simplicity, the use of unimolecular
amino acid assemblies to design attractive material has been limited
by the lack of chemical diversity and functional complexity.Chirality is a natural attribute of most biomolecules and bears
universal significance for chemistry, physics, biology, and medicine.[11−13] In an interesting strategy, it has been demonstrated that the concurrent
presence of both amino acid enantiomers may significantly alter the
functional properties of the resultant racemic mixture, compared to
the pure enantiomers. The nonpolar l-Asp crystal was converted
into a conglomerate of mixed polar sectors by incorporating different
amounts of d-Asp.[14] A pyroelectric
effect was observed for the nonpolar crystals of l-Ala upon
doping with the opposite enantiomer.[14−16] Racemic amino acid crystals
have also been reported to generate a voltage up to 2 times higher
than amino acid crystals composed of a single isomer.[17] Thus, the fabrication of chirality-induced attractive materials[18−20] and their pharmaceutical design[21−23] is an advanced avenue
of research, resulting in more favorable packing and tunable properties.
Several research groups have studied the effect of chirality on the
self-assembly nature of short peptides, which can mimic that of large
proteins.[24−33] For example, Marchesan etal.
have recently demonstrated that for tripeptides, only when the chirality
of the N-terminal amino acid was different from that of the other
amino acids were the resulting tripeptides able to form well-defined
self-assembled structures, while no ordered structures was observed
for the corresponding homochiral tripeptides.[28] Multicomponent gelators comprising amino acids of different chirality
were reported to show completely altered behavior along with significantly
different rheological properties that could not be achieved using
their individual components.[34−38] The mixed-enantiomers-based supramolecular gel showed enhanced mechanical
and thermal strength.[39] The use of racemic
peptides was also reported to increase the material rigidity of the
well-known peptide gelator as compared to gels prepared from either
pure enantiomer.[40] Also the use of a racemic
mixture is known, for instance to favor peptide and protein crystallization.[41,42] However, systematic demonstration of the effect of chirality on
the self-assembly nature of single amino acids and the consequent
modulation of the resulting functional characteristics has rarely
been reported.[43]Due to the inherent
properties of higher aggregation into ordered
structures and their well-defined role in peptide self-assembly processes,
aromatic amino acidsl-Phe and l-Trp have been utilized
for the design of interesting functionalities.[44−46] Our group has
previously presented the pioneering reports of the amyloid-like self-assembly
properties of l-Phe and l-Trp.[47,48] Subsequently, several other studies have reported the well-ordered
nanostructure formation by l-Phe and l-Trp under
different experimental conditions.[5,6,43,49] Attempts to investigate
the fiber-forming mechanism of l-Phe have shed some light
regarding the participation of the −NH3+ and −COO– groups in hydrogen bonding and
polar interactions.[49−51] However, the detailed mechanism of the concentration-dependent
stepwise self-assembly and structure formation by l-Trp in
solution has not been fully described yet. Moreover, exploring the
effect of d-enantiomers on the self-assembly pattern and
the molecular arrangement of the resultant structural organization
of aromatic single amino acids could demonstrate an exciting approach
for the development of potentially applicative materials. Recently,
we have deciphered the coassembly rule for amino acids based on the
matching of their interlayer separation in single-crystal structures.[52,53] In this context, the similar packing of two enantiomers of a particular
amino acid could be expected to allow their coassembly to fabricate
different materials with distinct properties from their parent pure
enantiomers.Herein, we investigated the self-assembly kinetics
and the mechanism
of structure formation by pure Phe and Trp enantiomers. Next, we explored
the role of chirality in the self-assembly and function of the amino
acids and the effect of chirality on the recognition of amino acids.
The presence of the opposite chirality (racemate) was found to significantly
alter the assembly kinetics and the resultant nanostructure morphologies
and allowed the chirality-induced fabrication of different nanoarchitectures.
Applying different experimental techniques, such as wide-angle X-ray
scattering (WAXS) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we demonstrated
the differences in the mechanism of self-assembly and the structural
organization of the single and mixed systems. Moreover, using atomic
force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation, we showed that the nanostructures
produced by the Phe dl-composite possessed a much higher
Young’s modulus of 53.5 ± 12.1 GPa, compared to 5.8 ±
0.7 and 1.8 ± 0.3 GPa for the l- and d-isomer,
respectively. Thus, these smart materials fabricated by the dl-racemic mixture could act as attractive candidates for future nanotechnological
applications.
Results and Discussion
Self-Assembly of Phe
To analyze the self-assembly of
Phe, we first probed the phase behavior of the pure enantiomers (l and d) and their equimolar mixture at a wide range
of concentrations up to 40 mg/mL. Dissolving either of the single
enantiomers in double-distilled water by heating at 90 °C produced
a clear solution, which remained clear over time, while cooling to
room temperature, even at the 40 mg/mL concentration (Figure a,b). However, the phase behavior
of the mixed dl (1:1) system was completely different. Although
upon heating, the equimolar mixture of up to 40 mg/mL of d and l isomers fully dissolved in water and produced a clear
solution, the turbidity of the solution began to increase immediately
after starting to cool (Figure b). Moreover, in very short time, large flake-like structures
were found to precipitate out from the solution, indicating a faster
rate of aggregation for the dl-system. Figure c–e shows high-resolution scanning
electron microscope (HR-SEM) images of the self-assembled nanostructures
formed by the pure enantiomers and their mixed systems. Both l- and d-Phe formed micrometer-long singular fiber structures
similar to the previously reported amyloid-like assemblies (Figure c,d).[47] However, the dl-system showed inhibition
of fiber formation and fabrication of different types of aggregates,
namely, crystalline flake-like structural assemblies (Figures e and S1). The formation of different types of morphologies coincided with
their optical appearances over time, as observed from their turbidity
assay. The level of turbidity was low for the more compact nanofibrillar
structures of pure l and d isomers, while increased
turbidity was measured for the dl-system due to a higher
degree of light scattering from the large flakes (Figure b).
Figure 1
Self-assembly of pure
and mixed Phe enantiomers. (a) Macroscopic
visualization of the phase behavior after 24 h. (b) Kinetics of the
405 nm absorbance of the three systems (-l, -d and
-dl) at 30 mg/mL over a period of 4 h. (c–e) HR-SEM
images of (c) l-Phe, (d) d-Phe, and (e) dl-Phe. (f–h) X-ray scattering 2D patterns of (f) l-Phe, (g) d-Phe, indicating random orientation of structures
in the plane of the film, and (h) dl-Phe, indicating the
presence of polycrystalline assemblies. (i) Corresponding azimuthally
integrated spectra of l-Phe, d-Phe, and dl-Phe shown in black, red, and blue, respectively. (j) Mass spectra
of the noncovalent assemblies of the intermolecular complexes. Hexagons
represent d-Phe (yellow) and l-Phe (blue).
Self-assembly of pure
and mixed Phe enantiomers. (a) Macroscopic
visualization of the phase behavior after 24 h. (b) Kinetics of the
405 nm absorbance of the three systems (-l, -d and
-dl) at 30 mg/mL over a period of 4 h. (c–e) HR-SEM
images of (c) l-Phe, (d) d-Phe, and (e) dl-Phe. (f–h) X-ray scattering 2D patterns of (f) l-Phe, (g) d-Phe, indicating random orientation of structures
in the plane of the film, and (h) dl-Phe, indicating the
presence of polycrystalline assemblies. (i) Corresponding azimuthally
integrated spectra of l-Phe, d-Phe, and dl-Phe shown in black, red, and blue, respectively. (j) Mass spectra
of the noncovalent assemblies of the intermolecular complexes. Hexagons
represent d-Phe (yellow) and l-Phe (blue).To structurally characterize the self-assembled
pure and mixed
enantiomeric systems, X-ray scattering experiments were performed
(Figure f–i).[54] For pure l- and d-Phe, the
fibers dried onto the Kapton film were randomly oriented in the plane
of the film, producing an isotropic 2D powder diffraction (Figure f,g). The corresponding
spectrum showed peaks at 4.5 Å, consistent with the repeating
equatorial distance of the Phe ring along head-to-tail chains as observed
in the single-crystal structure (Figures i and S2), along
with a strong peak observed near 14 Å corresponding to the interlayer
lateral separation distance in the thicker Phe fibers. In contrast,
the 2D image of the DL system showed a completely different pattern,
indicating the presence of polycrystalline assemblies. The anisotropic
scattering image suggested the flakes were preferentially oriented
in certain directions (Figure h). The presence of bright spots in particular places indicated
significant deflection of scattering toward the specific directions.
The corresponding spectrum showed a shift of both peaks corresponding
to the equatorial and lateral distances toward a higher d-spacing value, signifying an altered arrangement of d-
and l-Phe molecules in the mixture (Figure i). The crystal structure analysis of the
pure enantiomers showed that Phe self-assembled via −NH3+ and −COO– groups of neighboring molecules interacting through hydrogen bonding
and polar interactions (Figure S2).[55] The resulting two-dimensional H-bonded network
structure imposed a very much restricted condition on the Phe molecules.
To get rid of this strain, tyrosine (Tyr, ortho-hydroxyl Phe) molecules,
previously shown to form assembled structures via H-bonds mediated by the −OH and COO– groups,
were examined.[49] Both pure enantiomers
(-l and -d) and the mixed dl-Tyr were found
to assemble into a similar broom-type morphology due to straight H-bonds
between −OH and COO– groups (Figure S3). The different assembly of Phe thus suggests an
altered arrangement in dl-Phe that might provide a more strain-free
environment to the molecules.Recent advances in the field of
mass spectrometry allow a detailed
determination of the noncovalent interactions of small molecules with
ordered biomolecular structures and metaclusters.[53,56,57] To get further confirmation of the presence
of both d and l isomers in the flake-like structures,
we used electron-spray-ionization mass spectrometry by mixing a deuterium
level l-Phe(d5) with d-Phe (1:1) (Figure j). For the mixed
system, in addition to m/z peaks
at 164 and 169 corresponding to pure d-Phe and l-Phe(d5), a strong signal was observed at 356 emanating
from their composite materials. This analysis clearly established
the formation of an enantiomeric conjugate in the mixed system, accounting
for the altered properties compared to the pure enantiomers. The coassembly
formation was further confirmed by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
(Figure S4). l-Phe showed a positive
peak around 220 nm, in line with the previously reported spectrum
of Phe.[58]d-Phe gave rise to a
mirror image spectrum, with a strong peak in the same wavelength but
displaying a negative Cotton effect, as expected. The CD signal of
the dl mixture was almost flat close to the baseline, indicating
coassembly and the formation of an aggregate containing both enantiomers.To check whether the coassembly formation and subsequent fabrication
of different composite materials induced interesting properties, we
investigated the thermal and mechanical stability of the studied amino
acid systems. In the macroscale, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA)
characterization demonstrated both pure and mixed systems to be stable
up to 250 °C, indicating their similar thermal stability (Figure a). To describe the
mechanical rigidity of the crystals, Young’s modulus and point
stiffness were calculated. We used nanoindentation through AFM to
measure the micromechanical properties of the pure and composite materials
(Figure b–h).[59,60] Typically, the cantilever approached the surface of the crystals
and retracted at a constant speed, and the Young’s modulus
was obtained by fitting the force–distance traces with the
Hertz model (Figure b). The measured elasticity of the l-Phe fibers showed a
Young’s modulus of 5.8 ± 0.7 GPa along the elongated direction,
indicating a lower mechanical stability compared to the Phe–Phe
dimer,[61] and a point stiffness value of
56.4 ± 4.7 N m–1 (Figure c,f). The d-enantiomer showed a
Young’s modulus and point stiffness of 1.8 ± 0.3 GPa and
24.2 ± 4.8 N m–1, respectively (Figure d,g). However, the dl-composite materials displayed a highly increased Young’s
modulus of 53.5 ± 12.1 GPa, with a point stiffness of 245.9 ±
54.2 N m–1 (Figure e,h). The observed Young’s modulus value is
particularly high for bioorganic materials, as other biomaterials
like naturally derived DNA-based structures (0.3–2 GPa)[62,63] and insulin self-assembling nanofibers (0.28 GPa)[64] show a significantly lower value. These data indicated
a strong molecular packing in the dl-mixed system compared
to the pure enantiomers, resulting in the formation of rigid materials
displaying sufficiently high mechanostability to be useful for biomaterial
applications.
Figure 2
Thermal and mechanical properties of Phe self-assemblies.
(a) TGA
spectra of l-Phe and d-Phe fibers and dl-Phe crystalline flakes. (b) Schematic illustration of AFM nanoindentation
employed to measure the mechanical properties of self-assembled nanostructures.
(c–e) Young’s modulus of (c) l-Phe, (d) d-Phe, and (e) dl-Phe. (f–h) Point stiffness
calculated according to the linear relationship between Young’s
modulus and stiffness of (f) l-Phe, (g) d-Phe, and
(h) dl-Phe.
Thermal and mechanical properties of Phe self-assemblies.
(a) TGA
spectra of l-Phe and d-Phe fibers and dl-Phe crystalline flakes. (b) Schematic illustration of AFM nanoindentation
employed to measure the mechanical properties of self-assembled nanostructures.
(c–e) Young’s modulus of (c) l-Phe, (d) d-Phe, and (e) dl-Phe. (f–h) Point stiffness
calculated according to the linear relationship between Young’s
modulus and stiffness of (f) l-Phe, (g) d-Phe, and
(h) dl-Phe.We used atomistic molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations to model
Phe crystals. Since the structure of the racemic Phe crystal is not
known, we simulated only one pure enantiomer, l-Phe crystal.
First, we prepared small bilayer Phe crystals, with structures shown
in Figure . These
elongated crystals were cut either along the well-visible aromatic
zipper or orthogonal to it, producing two crystals of 40 × 8
× 2 or 8 × 40 × 2 amino acids, placed in physiological
solutions under ambient conditions (see Materials
and Methods). Figure a,b reveal that after 20 ns of simulations, these l-Phe crystals had a tendency to fold in both parallel and orthogonal
directions relative to the aromatic zipper. This tendency toward folding
might promote the crystal to grow in a linear fashion, most likely
along the zipper.
Figure 3
MD simulations of pure l-Phe crystals. (a) Pure l-Phe crystal cut along an aromatic zipper after 20 ns of simulation.
(b) Pure l-Phe crystal cut orthogonally to the aromatic zipper
after 20 ns of simulations. (1) Top bilayer facet, (2) the facet parallel
to the aromatic zipper, and (3) the facet orthogonal to the aromatic
zipper. Scale bar represents 1 nm.
MD simulations of pure l-Phe crystals. (a) Pure l-Phe crystal cut along an aromatic zipper after 20 ns of simulation.
(b) Pure l-Phe crystal cut orthogonally to the aromatic zipper
after 20 ns of simulations. (1) Top bilayer facet, (2) the facet parallel
to the aromatic zipper, and (3) the facet orthogonal to the aromatic
zipper. Scale bar represents 1 nm.These simulations reveal that the chirality of amino acids and
the lack of central symmetry in the crystals formed by these molecules
promote crystal bending. Moreover, crystals formed by enantiomers
of the same amino acid should be mirror images of each other. Therefore,
their simple combination would give rise to flat racemic crystals.
Real racemic crystals would contain the same number of both enantiomers
suitably packed in their elementary cells, thus producing flat crystals.Next, we simulated the dynamics of l-Phe on the surfaces
of the crystals and calculated the binding energies of amino acids
nested on the crystal facets (see Supporting Information). The results reveal that the top bilayer (facet 1 in Figure ) is highly stable, due to
hydrogen-bonding networks between zwitterion groups of the amino acids,
which keep the bilayers intact. Additional bilayers bind to the top
bilayer through weaker C–H–H–C dispersion interactions,
which would slow down growth in this direction. The amino acids show
a large mobility on the l-Phe crystal facets, which are parallel
and orthogonal to the aromatic zipper (facets 2, 3, respectively,
in Figure ). The amino
acids in the facet parallel to the aromatic zipper (facet 2 in Figure ) show relatively
strong binding with other amino acids in the same facet, but not with
the remainder of the crystal. In the facet orthogonal to the aromatic
zipper (facet 3 in Figure ), the situation is opposite. These results show that growth
on the facet parallel to the aromatic zipper is more likely to continue
and produce twisted 1D crystals. The d-isomer is only a mirror
image of the l-isomer. Thus, the evolutions of the d-isomer will be a mirror image of the l-isomer and will
also grow into 1D twisted structures.
Self-Assembly of Trp
The chirality-induced structural
modulation and consequent appearance of attractive mechanical properties
of Phe inspired us to investigate the characteristics of another important
aromatic amino acid, Trp. Initially, the self-assembly nature of pure l-Trp was studied by measuring the size of the resultant nanostructures
at increasing concentrations using dynamic light scattering (DLS)
(Figure a). The results
showed that the size abruptly increased at a concentration of 30 mg/mL,
indicating an extensive high aggregation. While at lower concentrations
the solution remained clear, at 30 mg/mL the turbidity raised over
time (Figures b and S5). The self-assembled morphology was studied
by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Short fibers 50–100
nm in diameter and several micrometers in length were observed (Figures c and S6), similar to our earlier report.[48] Previous simulation annealing also showed that l-Trp molecules stacked into a tubular structure with a 4-fold
symmetry and folded into extremely well-organized fibrillar structures
similar to those of Phe, where hydrophilic termini were positioned
internally and the hydrophobic rings resided externally, exposed to
the solvent.[65] To experimentally probe
the role of the aromatic ring in the self-assembly process of l-Trp, an ANS (8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid) binding
assay was employed. ANS is a widely used fluorescent reagent that
blue shifts with a higher quantum yield upon changing the surface
environment from hydrophilic to hydrophobic as also observed for Phe.[43] With elevated concentrations of l-Trp,
an increase in the fluorescence intensity of ANS with concomitant
blue shift of the maxima from 530 nm to 507 nm was observed (Figure d). These dose-dependent
changes of fluorescence maxima suggested a change of the environment
toward higher hydrophobicity, probably due to aromatic interactions.[66,67] The involvement of the aromatic protons in the self-assembly process
was further investigated through concentration-dependent 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure e–g). Increasing the concentration from 10 mg/mL to
30 mg/mL resulted in an upfield shift of the aryl proton, He, and Hf, indicating their screening due to π–π
interactions between aromatic rings. However, the indole N–H
proton (Ha) and the nearby proton (Hd) shifted
toward a higher ppm value, which specified the involvement of the
N–Ha proton in hydrogen bonding at higher concentrations
and conferred a change of the electronic environment in the nearby
region.[68,69]
Figure 4
Self-assembly of l-Trp. (a) DLS assay
with increasing
concentration showing sudden increase in size of structures at 30
mg/mL concentration due to self-assembly. (b) Kinetics of phase behavior
for different concentrations as observed by the absorbance at 405
nm over a period of 14 h. (c) TEM image of self-assembled nanostructures.
(d) ANS binding fluorescence assay showing the change of surface environment
from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. (e) Chemical structure of l-Trp with the different protons marked in different colors. (f, g)
NMR spectrum showing the 1H chemical shift (d, ppm) of
(f) pyrrole N–Ha and (g) aryl protons (Hd, He, Hf) at increasing concentrations. Scale
bar of (c) is 2 μm.
Self-assembly of l-Trp. (a) DLS assay
with increasing
concentration showing sudden increase in size of structures at 30
mg/mL concentration due to self-assembly. (b) Kinetics of phase behavior
for different concentrations as observed by the absorbance at 405
nm over a period of 14 h. (c) TEM image of self-assembled nanostructures.
(d) ANS binding fluorescence assay showing the change of surface environment
from hydrophilic to hydrophobic. (e) Chemical structure of l-Trp with the different protons marked in different colors. (f, g)
NMR spectrum showing the 1H chemical shift (d, ppm) of
(f) pyrrole N–Ha and (g) aryl protons (Hd, He, Hf) at increasing concentrations. Scale
bar of (c) is 2 μm.To understand the effect of chirality on the self-assembly of l-Trp, we employed the d-Trp and thoroughly studied
the effect in the racemic mixture. The phase behavior of pure d-Trp revealed to some extent different kinetics than that of l-Trp, as it did not show a change in turbidity over time at
the 30 mg/mL concentrations, but formed structures in solution at
higher concentration (Figures a and S5). ANS binding assay using d-Trp showed a similar change of environment from hydrophilic
to hydrophobic, as also observed for l-Trp (Figure S7). The concentration-dependent NMR study also demonstrated
a shift toward lower ppm values due to the screening of the aromatic
proton as a result of π–π stacking (Figure S8). The characteristics of an equimolar
mixture of d- and l-Trp (1:1) were completely different
from those of their individual pure enantiomers. The turbidity of
the dl-Trp solution increased very rapidly during cooling,
even at the lower concentrations, indicating a higher aggregation
rate for the enantiomeric mixed system (Figures a and S5), similar
to dl-Phe. The formation of composite materials by the equimolar
mixture of the l- and d-enantiomers was further
confirmed by mass spectrometry. For the 1:1 mixture of d-Trp
and l-Trp(indole-d), along with m/z peaks at
203 and 208 corresponding to their individual mass, a strong peak
was observed at 434 due to the formation of the composite material
(Figure b). CD spectra
further confirmed the coassembly of the equimolar mixture of d- and l-Trp (Figure S9). The pure l- and d-Trp produced nearly mirror image peaks around
∼223 nm. However, for the dl-mixed system, the spectrum
was almost entirely flat and very close to the baseline, indicating
the presence of racemic aggregates. The ANS binding (Figure S10) and NMR studies (Figure S11) of dl-Trp revealed the involvement of aromatic π–π
interactions in the self-assembly process, as observed for pure d- and l-Trp. To investigate the underlying morphology,
we employed HR-SEM and TEM analysis. Similar to l-Trp, d-Trp formed short fibers, several micrometers in length (Figure c,e). In contrast,
as observed in both SEM and TEM images, the dl-conjugate
fabricated completely different nanostructures, with a crystalline
flake-like morphology (Figures d,f and S12).
Figure 5
Modulation of l-Trp self-assembly by incorporation of d-Trp. (a) Kinetics
of the 405 nm absorbance of the 30 mg/mL
solutions over a time period of 3 h. (b) Mass spectra of the noncovalent
assemblies of the intermolecular complexes. (c–f) HR-SEM and
TEM images of (c and e) d-Trp and (d and f) dl-Trp.
(g–i) X-ray scattering 2D patterns of (g) l-Trp, (h) d-Trp, and (i) dl-Trp. (j) Corresponding azimuthally
integrated spectra. Scale bar for (c) and (d) is 50 μm and for
(e) and (f) is 1 μm.
Modulation of l-Trp self-assembly by incorporation of d-Trp. (a) Kinetics
of the 405 nm absorbance of the 30 mg/mL
solutions over a time period of 3 h. (b) Mass spectra of the noncovalent
assemblies of the intermolecular complexes. (c–f) HR-SEM and
TEM images of (c and e) d-Trp and (d and f) dl-Trp.
(g–i) X-ray scattering 2D patterns of (g) l-Trp, (h) d-Trp, and (i) dl-Trp. (j) Corresponding azimuthally
integrated spectra. Scale bar for (c) and (d) is 50 μm and for
(e) and (f) is 1 μm.The details of the molecular arrangement of the self-assembled
nanostructures formed by pure and mixed enantiomers were studied by
WAXS, allowing the investigation of the supramolecular organization
of the different systems at a local scale (Figure g–j). Pure l- or d-Trp produced powder diffraction 2D images with arc-centered intensity
maxima, similar to pure Phe enantiomers (Figure g,h), reflecting the randomly oriented organization
of the elongated structures. However, the presence of shorter fibers
compared to Phe produced 2D scattering images that displayed a preferred
orientation within the sample space, as each series of peaks was intensified
along a specific angle (red and yellow arrows in Figure g). The spectrum containing
all the peaks is shown in Figure j. The peak pertaining to the equatorial distance at
4.75 Å was consistent with the repeating unit distance between
molecules observed in the single-crystal structure of pure l/d Trp.[70] The 17.5 Å peak
was also consistent with the interlayer spacing, proposing lateral
organization of Trp. However, the 2D image of the dl-conjugate
showed a clear difference from the pure enantiomers. The scattering
pattern suggested the formation of polycrystalline randomly oriented
materials (Figure i). The corresponding spectrum also showed an altered position of
the peaks of both equatorial and meridional distances along with the
appearance of several additional peaks, further validating the formation
of a different composite (Figure j). Moreover, alternation of the molecular packing
was further supported by the inversion of the relative intensities
of the meridional and equatorial peaks.To gain further insight
into the mechanism of molecular arrangement
of the pure enantiomer and conjugate assemblies, single-crystal structures
of l-Trp[70] and dl-Trp
grown from water were analyzed in detail (Figure ). The differences in their packing better
clarified the difference in the resultant self-assembled nanostructures. l-Trp crystallized in space group P1 with 16 molecules per asymmetric unit, in a pseudohexagonal arrangement.
Along the crystallographic b-direction, the molecules
were connected through head-to-tail H-bonding and fabricated a single
molecular chain (marked in pink in Figure a). Along the a-axis, the
molecules were connected in a sideways fashion through two H-bonds
on each side and thus produced a tape-like arrangement (marked in
blue in Figure a).
The H-bond distances for different previously reported Trp crystals
are compared in Supplementary Table S5.
In the higher order packing, l-Trp arranged in a layer-by-layer
structure resembling a supramolecular β-sheet structure in which
two adjacent layers were stabilized through aromatic interactions
(Figure b).[52] However, the aromatic surface of the stacking
layers did not exactly fit in a “knobs-in-holes” manner,
but rather oriented around a ±60° twisted angle and interacted
through edge-to-face π–π stacking interactions
(Figure c). For dl-Trp, a similar head-to-tail chain formation through H-bonding
was observed (Figure d–f). Yet, the centrosymmetric dimer formation of two adjacent
chains of dl-Trp could not take place in the structure of
the single enantiomers, either l- or d-Trp. Moreover,
the tape-like structural pattern of the pure enantiomer was missing
in the arrangement of dl-Trp. In higher order packing, dl-Trp also arranged into a similar layer-by-layer organization
(Figure e) but with
perfect “knobs-in-holes” fitting of aromatic surfaces
through face-to-face π–π interaction (Figure f). This additional
stabilization of dl-Trp probably directed the self-assembly
pattern of the racemic material toward a different conformation rather
than the 1D fiber formed by the pure enantiomers.
Figure 6
Single-crystal structural
analysis of (a–c) l-Trp
and (d–f) dl-Trp. l-Trp: (a) Molecular chain
formation (pink) and tape-like arrangement (blue). (b) Supramolecular
β-sheet structure. (c) Twisted angle between two adjacent aromatic
rings highlighted by a yellow circle in (b). dl-Trp: (d)
3D network arrangement through H-bonding interactions of molecular
chains (pink). (e) Supramolecular β-sheet structure. (f) “Knobs-in-holes”
fitting of adjacent aromatic rings highlighted by a yellow circle
in (e).
Single-crystal structural
analysis of (a–c) l-Trp
and (d–f) dl-Trp. l-Trp: (a) Molecular chain
formation (pink) and tape-like arrangement (blue). (b) Supramolecular
β-sheet structure. (c) Twisted angle between two adjacent aromatic
rings highlighted by a yellow circle in (b). dl-Trp: (d)
3D network arrangement through H-bonding interactions of molecular
chains (pink). (e) Supramolecular β-sheet structure. (f) “Knobs-in-holes”
fitting of adjacent aromatic rings highlighted by a yellow circle
in (e).These Trp systems were modeled
like in Figure , including
the racemic Trp crystal structure.
The prepared small bilayer Trp crystals, with structures shown in Figure , consisted of either
pure left-handed (l) isomers or from 50% left- and 50% right-handed
(d) isomers. The crystals were again cut and simulated as
before. Figure a,b
reveal that after 20 ns the pure l-Trp crystal has a tendency
to fold in a direction parallel to the aromatic zipper, but it undulates
along the orthogonal direction.[48] Thus, l(d)-Trp crystals might grow along the zipper (1D),
in analogy to l(d)-Phe crystals. On the other hand,
the mixed dl-Trp crystals stay on average flat, as shown
in Figure c,d, since
their possible twists are compensated by the presence of both enantiomers.
The mixed dl-Trp crystals might grow in 2D or 3D.
Figure 7
MD simulations
of Trp crystals. l-Trp crystal cut (a)
along an aromatic zipper and (b) orthogonally to the aromatic zipper
after 20 ns. dl-Trp crystal cut (c) parallel to the aromatic
zipper and (d) orthogonally to the aromatic zipper after 100 ns. Points
showing (1) the top bilayer facet, (2) the facet parallel to aromatic
zipper, and (3) the facet orthogonal to aromatic zipper. Scale bar
represents 1 nm.
MD simulations
of Trp crystals. l-Trp crystal cut (a)
along an aromatic zipper and (b) orthogonally to the aromatic zipper
after 20 ns. dl-Trp crystal cut (c) parallel to the aromatic
zipper and (d) orthogonally to the aromatic zipper after 100 ns. Points
showing (1) the top bilayer facet, (2) the facet parallel to aromatic
zipper, and (3) the facet orthogonal to aromatic zipper. Scale bar
represents 1 nm.l-Trp crystals
have similar stability of facets like l-Phe crystals. In
particular, the amino acids on the facet
parallel to the aromatic zipper (facet 2 in Figure ) show small mobility and relatively strong
binding energies. In combination with the observed bending, it is
likely that the crystal would grow in this 1D direction. In the dl-Trp crystal, the facet orthogonal to the aromatic zipper
(facet 3 in Figure ) is more stable, while the facet parallel to the zipper is less
stable. This could be understood from the binding energies (Tables S3 and S4), showing that the same enantiomers
have larger binding energies than opposite enantiomers (Supporting Information). However, a flat racemic
crystal should be able to easily grow in both directions.
Conclusion
Aromatic amino acids play a crucial role in the formation of functional
structures by the self-assembly of proteins and peptides, the major
components of life. Our investigation of aromatic amino acid self-assembly
together with the demonstration of the involvement of various interactions,
such as electrostatic interactions, aromatic π–π
stacking, hydrogen bonding, etc., to drive the aggregation
process provides the basis for understanding their self-assembly mechanism.
Moreover, the experimental evidence presented here suggests different
self-assembly kinetics and mechanisms for dl-composites of
aromatic amino acids, allowing the fabrication of interesting materials
with exciting physical properties compared to the pure enantiomers.
Previously reported protein crystallography revealed that a racemic
mixture of the enantiomeric forms of a protein molecule can crystallize
in ways not obtainable by natural proteins.[41] In addition, several experimental data support a theoretical prediction
that racemic protein mixtures are highly amenable to crystallization
due to the accessibility of several highly preferred achiral space
groups. The high aggregation propensity of dl-amino acids
to form self-assembled structures compared to the pure enantiomers,
as observed in the current study, also supports a similar phenomenon
for single amino acids. Moreover, the single-crystal structure analysis
clearly demonstrated a favorable knob-to-hole packing of aromatic
rings in the dl-mixture, which induced the easy growth of
racemic crystals and the fabrication of self-assembled rigid materials.
This study provides a different direction for chirality-induced tailor-made
fabrication of futuristic functionalities based on natural systems
for diverse nanotechnological applications.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
All amino acids were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(purity >98%).
Turbidity Analysis
Turbidity analysis
for the pure
and composite amino acids was conducted by preparing fresh solutions
at different concentrations in deionized water. Then, 200 μL
aliquots were pipetted into a 96-well plate, which was sealed using
a Breathe-Easy sealing membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, Rehovot, Israel),
and absorbance at 405 nm was measured over time. All measurements
were performed using a Synergy HT plate reader (CLARIOstar, BAAG LABTECH)
at 25 °C.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The amino acids
were dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 2 mg/mL by
heating to 90 °C followed by gradual cooling of the solutions.
For dl-composites, 1 mg of each amino acids was similarly
dissolved in 1 mL of deionized water. A 5 μL aliquot was allowed
to dry on a microscope glass coverslip at ambient conditions overnight
and coated with Au. SEM images were recorded using a JSM-6700F FE-SEM
(JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 10 kV.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
The amino acids were
dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 2 mg/mL by heating
to 90 °C followed by gradual cooling of the solutions. For dl-composites, 1 mg of each amino acid was similarly dissolved
in 1 mL of deionized water. A 10 μL aliquot of the amino acid
solution was placed on a 300-mesh copper grid. After 1 min, excess
fluids were removed. For negative staining, the grid was stained with
freshly prepared 2% uranyl acetate in water, and after 2 min, excess
fluid was removed from the grid. Samples were viewed using a JEOL
1200EX electron microscope operating at 80 kV.
Mass Spectrometry
Samples were prepared for mass spectrometry
by dissolving the amino acids in deionized water at a concentration
of 1 mM by heating to 90 °C. Mass spectrometry was recorded using
an Acquity UPLC system coupled to a TQD XEVO triple quadrupole ESI
source mass spectrometer system from Waters (Milford, MA, USA).
Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering
The amino acids were dissolved
in deionized water at a concentration of 2 mg/mL for individual amino
acids or 1 mg/mL each for dl-composites by heating to 90
°C. The assembled structures were drop-cast over a thin Kapton
film and left to dry in the presence of a magnetic field to produce
aligned structures. WAXS measurements were performed using an in-house
X-ray scattering system, with a GeniX (Xenocs) low-divergence Cu Kα
radiation source (wavelength of 1.54 Å) and a scatterless slits
setup.[71] Two-dimensional scattering data,
with a momentum transfer wave vector (q) range of
0.07–2.5 Å–1 at a sample-to-detector
distance of approximately 160 mm, were collected on a Pilatus 300
K detector (Dectris, Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland) and radially integrated
using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA)-based procedures (SAXSi).
Calibration was performed using silver behenate. The scattering data
of the empty Kapton film was collected as background and subtracted
from the sample measurement.
Thermal Gravimetric Analysis
TGA experiments were performed
using a TA Instruments (USA) module SDT 2950, at a temperature range
between 40 and 510 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min–1, under a dry ultrahigh-purity argon atmosphere.
Fluorescence
For fluorescent emission characterization,
the solution was incubated in a clean quartz cuvette, and the spectra
were collected using a FluoroMax-4 spectrofluorometer (Horiba Jobin
Yvon, Kyoto, Japan) at ambient temperature. The excitation wavelength
was set at 350 nm with a slit of 5 nm and a step of 20 nm, and the
emission wavelength was set at 400–660 nm with a slit of 5
nm and a step of 2 nm. Deionized water was used as background and
subtracted.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
All NMR
studies were carried
out on a Brüker AVANCE 500 MHz spectrometer at 278 K. Amino
acid concentrations were in the range of 10–30 mg/mL in DMSO-d6.
Young’s Modulus Measurement
Experiments were
carried out using a commercial AFM (JPK, Nanowizard II, Berlin, Germany).
The force curves were obtained using the commercial software from
JPK and analyzed by a custom-written procedure based on Igor pro 6.12
(Wavemetrics Inc.). Silica cantilevers (RTESPA-525 Bruker Company
with the half-open angle of the pyramidal face of θ < 10°,
tip radius ∼8 nm, frequency in air ∼525 kHz) were used
in all experiments. The spring constant of the cantilevers was about
200 N m–1. The maximum loading force was set to
1 μN for the amino acid crystals. All AFM nanoindentation experiments
were carried out at room temperature. In a typical experiment, the
amino acid crystals were spread over the surface of a freshly cleaved
mica substrate. Then, the cantilever was moved over the crystal with
the help of an optical microscope at a constant speed of 2 μm
s–1 and held on the crystal surface at a constant
force of 1 μN. Then, the cantilever was retracted and moved
to another spot for the next cycle. The indentation fit was performed
using a custom-written Igor program and manually checked after the
fitting. Each approaching force–deformation curve in the range
of 30 nm, or from the contact point to the maximum indentation depth,
if the maximum indentation depth was less than 30 nm, was fitted.
By fitting the approaching curve to the Hertz model (1), the Young’s
modulus of the crystals was obtained. Typically, 4 or 5 such regions
(3 μm × 3 μm, 400 pixels) were randomly selected
for each sample to construct the elasticity histogram.where F is the force acting
on the cantilever, h is the indentation depth of
the crystal by the cantilever tip, α is the half-angle of the
tip, E is the Young’s modulus of the sample,
and v is the Poisson ratio. v =
0.5 was used in all calculations.
Point Stiffness Calculation
The measured point stiffness
(kmeas) is composed of the stiffness constants
of the cantilever (kcan) and the crystals
(kcry). Assuming that the crystal and
the cantilever act as two serial springs, the point stiffness of the
crystal can be calculated using eq . To estimate the material property of the crystals,
we assumed that the mechanical behavior of the crystal could be described
as linear elastic, which is a good approximation for solids under
small strains.
Crystal
Preparation and Data Collection
Crystals used
for data collection were grown using the vapor diffusion method. The
dry amino acid was first dissolved in D2O, at a concentration
of 5 mg/mL. Then, 50 μL was deposited into a series of 8 ×
40 mm vessels. Each tube was sealed with Parafilm, in which a single
small hole was pricked using a needle. The samples were placed inside
a larger vessel filled with 2 mL of acetonitrile. The systems were
ultimately capped and incubated at 18 °C for several days. Crystals
typically grew within 7–8 days. For data collection, crystals
were coated in Paratone oil (Hampton Research), mounted on a MiTeGen
cryo-loop, and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were
collected at 100 K on a Rigaku XtaLabPro with a Dectris Pilatus 3R
200 K A detector using Cu Kα radiation at λ = 1.541 84
Å.
Processing and Structural Refinement of Crystal
Data
The diffraction data were processed using CrysAlisPro
1.171.39.22a.
The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXT-2014/5.[72] The refinements were performed with SHELXL-2016/4
and weighted full-matrix least-squares against |F2| using all data. Atoms were refined independently and
anisotropically, with the exception of hydrogen atoms, which were
placed in calculated positions and refined in a riding mode. Crystal
data collection and refinement parameters are shown in Supplementary Table 6, and the complete data can
be found in the cif file as Supporting Information. The crystallographic data have been deposited in the CCDC with
nos. 1522755 and 1943707 for d-Phe and dl-Trp, respectively.
MD Simulation
The MD simulations were performed with
NAMD2.12 and NAMD 2.13 packages,[73] using
a CHARMM 27 force field.[74] Atomistic MD
simulations were performed under physiological conditions, i.e., [NaCl] = 0.15 M, where the amino acids were in zwitterionic
form. The TIP3P model was used for water molecules. The simulations
were described by a Langevin dynamics in an NPT ensemble with P = 1 atm and T = 310 K. A Particle Mesh
Ewald[75] summation was used to calculate
long-range Coulombic interactions, with a grid spacing of 1.0. Short-range
dispersion interactions used a switching algorithm, with an on/off
distance of 10/12 Å. Pair lists were 13.5 Å, updated every
20 steps; 1–4 interactions were not scaled.
Crystal
Bending Simulations
Left-handed and mixed enantiomer
crystals were constructed using crystal structures.[55,70] Each crystal has one bilayer held together by hydrogen bonding between
40 × 8 × 2 or 8 × 40 × 2 amino acids. Left-handed
crystals were minimized for 50 000 steps and pre-equilibrated
for 300 ps, with heavy amino acid atoms constrained. Then, these crystals
were released and simulated for 20 ns, with a time step of 2 fs and
γLang = 1.00 ps–1. Mixed enantiomer
crystals were minimized for 20 000 steps and pre-equilibrated
for 1–1.6 ns, with heavy amino acid atoms constrained. Then,
the crystals were released and simulated for 100 ns.
Amino
Acids Mobility Simulations
Here, the two types
of crystals with dimensions of 12 × 12 × 12 amino acids
were in a physiological solution. First, the systems were minimized
for 5000 steps, with heavy amino acid atoms constrained. Then, the
systems were warmed for 2000 steps, with a time step of 1 fs, γLang = 1.00 ps–1, and an increment of 1 K
every 5 steps until the temperature reached 310 K. Then, the systems
were pre-equilibrated with the same constraints for 1 ns and a time
step of 1 fs. Afterward, the systems were further pre-equilibrated
for 1 ns, a time step of 1 fs, and γLang = 0.01 ps–1, while eliminating constraints on one side group
of each amino acid of the central 10 × 10 amino acids on each
facet. Finally, the central 10 × 10 amino acids were released,
while all other heavy amino acid atoms were constrained and simulated
for 30 ns at a time step of 2 fs.
Enthalpy of Binding Calculations
We calculated the
enthalpy of amino acids binding to the crystal (described in the previous
paragraph), using NAMD energy plugin version 1.4[73] in VMD.[76] Enthalpies of binding
were calculated: (1) between amino acids and facets within which they
were present and (2) between those amino acids and the remaining (constrained)
amino acids in the crystal, ignoring solvent effects in both calculations.
Enthalpy of binding was the sum of electrostatic and dispersion interactions,
assuming Coulombic and 12–6 Lennard-Jones potentials, respectively.
In the enthalpy calculations, the system parameters were kept the
same as in the rest of the simulations. We calculated each enthalpy
of binding every 10 ps for the entire 30 ns of simulation. We normalized
the enthalpy terms with respect to the number of mobile amino acids
(100 in each calculation) and averaged them over all snapshots.
Authors: Stuart A Sievers; John Karanicolas; Howard W Chang; Anni Zhao; Lin Jiang; Onofrio Zirafi; Jason T Stevens; Jan Münch; David Baker; David Eisenberg Journal: Nature Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Elena Meirzadeh; Liel Sapir; Hagai Cohen; Sidney R Cohen; David Ehre; Daniel Harries; Meir Lahav; Igor Lubomirsky Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sarah Guerin; Joseph O'Donnell; Ehtsham U Haq; Cian McKeown; Christophe Silien; Fernando M F Rhen; Tewfik Soulimane; Syed A M Tofail; Damien Thompson Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 9.161