Ahmed Yousaf1, Rachael Hagen1,2, Emily Delaney1, Stephen Davis3,4, Zachary Zinn1. 1. Department of Dermatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. 2. West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV, USA. 3. Department of Health Policy, Management & Leadership, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Social media use has been suggested to worsen psychiatric health among adolescents, especially those with visible skin lesions including acne. However, little is known about social media's impact on acne treatment. The purpose of the study sought to characterize the influence of social media use on acne treatment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of West Virginia University ambulatory patients whose chief complaint was acne was conducted. The survey collected sociodemographics and queried whether individuals accessed social media for acne treatment advice or not, whether changes to acne care were made based on social media, and whether these changes aligned with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) clinical guidelines for acne management. RESULTS: Of 130 respondents, 45% consulted social media for acne treatment advice (54% of women vs 31% of men). 41% of adolescents and 51% of adults consulted social media. The most used platforms were YouTube and Instagram (58% each). Social media users often tried an OTC treatment (81%) or dietary modification (40%). However, only 31% of participants consulting social media made changes fully aligned with AAD clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Social media-influenced acne treatment advice is prevalent, especially among women, adolescents, and young adults. This treatment advice frequently does not align with AAD guidelines, with notably 40% of respondents choosing dietary modification for acne management. These results suggest that dermatologists should inquire about social media acne treatment advice and directly address misinformation.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Social media use has been suggested to worsen psychiatric health among adolescents, especially those with visible skin lesions including acne. However, little is known about social media's impact on acne treatment. The purpose of the study sought to characterize the influence of social media use on acne treatment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of West Virginia University ambulatory patients whose chief complaint was acne was conducted. The survey collected sociodemographics and queried whether individuals accessed social media for acne treatment advice or not, whether changes to acne care were made based on social media, and whether these changes aligned with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) clinical guidelines for acne management. RESULTS: Of 130 respondents, 45% consulted social media for acne treatment advice (54% of women vs 31% of men). 41% of adolescents and 51% of adults consulted social media. The most used platforms were YouTube and Instagram (58% each). Social media users often tried an OTC treatment (81%) or dietary modification (40%). However, only 31% of participants consulting social media made changes fully aligned with AAD clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Social media-influenced acne treatment advice is prevalent, especially among women, adolescents, and young adults. This treatment advice frequently does not align with AAD guidelines, with notably 40% of respondents choosing dietary modification for acne management. These results suggest that dermatologists should inquire about social media acne treatment advice and directly address misinformation.
Keywords:
American Academy of Dermatology; Instagram; Reddit; YouTube; acne; education; guidelines; internet; medication; online; pediatric; recommendations; social media; teens; treatment
Authors: Andrea L Zaenglein; Arun L Pathy; Bethanee J Schlosser; Ali Alikhan; Hilary E Baldwin; Diane S Berson; Whitney P Bowe; Emmy M Graber; Julie C Harper; Sewon Kang; Jonette E Keri; James J Leyden; Rachel V Reynolds; Nanette B Silverberg; Linda F Stein Gold; Megha M Tollefson; Jonathan S Weiss; Nancy C Dolan; Andrew A Sagan; Mackenzie Stern; Kevin M Boyer; Reva Bhushan Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Heather M Griffis; Austin S Kilaru; Rachel M Werner; David A Asch; John C Hershey; Shawndra Hill; Yoonhee P Ha; Allison Sellers; Kevin Mahoney; Raina M Merchant Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez; Fátima Lucía Fernández-Cerezo; Jara Díaz-Jimenez; Manuel Rosety-Rodriguez; Antonio Jesús Díaz; Francisco Javier Ordonez; Miguel Ángel Rosety; Ignacio Rosety Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Esther de Vries; Petra Denig; Sieta T de Vries; Taco B M Monster; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg; Peter G M Mol Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.606