Literature DB >> 31442538

Engaging but inaccurate: A cross-sectional analysis of acne videos on social media from non-health care sources.

Andrea J Borba1, Paulina M Young2, Charlotte Read3, April W Armstrong4.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID： 31442538     DOI： 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN： 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The influence of social media on acne treatment: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ahmed Yousaf; Rachael Hagen; Emily Delaney; Stephen Davis; Zachary Zinn
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  YouTube as a Source of Information on Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Brandon L Adler; Nicole Harter; Caron Park; Vincent DeLeo
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 3.  A Review of Advancement on Influencing Factors of Acne: An Emphasis on Environment Characteristics.

Authors:  Jianting Yang; Haoran Yang; Aie Xu; Li He
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo.

Authors:  Louai A Salah; Saad AlTalhab; Aamir Omair; Mohammed AlJasser
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-07

5.  The Influence of Social Media on the Treatment of Acne in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Reem K Bahaj; Zahraa H Alsaggaf; Mohammed H Abduljabbar; Jehad O Hariri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiangqing Huang; Shengcen Zhang; Qirong Xiao; Yingping Cao; Bin Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.