Literature DB >> 31943693

Two-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a drug-coated balloon with a drug-eluting stent in native small coronary vessels: The RESTORE Small Vessel Disease China trial.

Jian Tian1, Yi-da Tang1, Shubin Qiao1, Xi Su2, Yundai Chen3, Zening Jin4, Hui Chen5, Biao Xu6, Xiangqing Kong7, Wenyue Pang8, Yong Liu9, Zaixin Yu10, Xue Li11, Hui Li12, Yanyan Zhao13, Yang Wang13, Wei Li13, Changdong Guan14, Runlin Gao1, Bo Xu14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical outcomes of the RESTORE drug-coated balloon (DCB; Cardionovum, Bonn, Germany) for treatment of de novo small vessel disease (SVD) beyond 1 year.
BACKGROUND: Previous reports have demonstrated the noninferiority of the RESTORE DCB to the RESOLUTE Integrity drug-eluting stent (DES; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in terms of 9-month in-segment percent diameter stenosis.
METHODS: In the prospective, multicenter, noninferiority RESTORE SVD China trial, 230 patients with visually-estimated reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥2.25 and ≤2.75 mm were randomized to DCB or DES in a 1:1 ratio stratified by diabetes and number of lesions treated. Furthermore, 32 patients with RVD ≥2.00 and <2.25 mm were enrolled in a nested very small vessel (VSV) registry. Clinical follow-up were performed at 2 years to evaluate target lesion failure (TLF) in both groups and the VSV cohort.
RESULTS: Overall, 256 (97.7%) patients (115 and 109 in the DCB and DES groups, respectively, and 32 in the VSV cohort) completed 2 years of follow-up. There was no significant difference in TLF between the DCB and DES groups (5.2 vs. 3.7%, p = .75). Target lesion revascularization was acceptable at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years, and did not differ significantly with DCB from that in the DES group (0.9 vs. 0%, p = 1.0, 4.4 vs. 2.6%, p = .72, 5.2 vs. 2.8%, p = .50, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the second-generation DES, the RESTORE DCB did not increase the risk of clinical outcomes. Late catch-up phenomen requiring revascularization was not significant in this study.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty, balloon, coronary; coronary artery disease; follow-up studies; percutaneous coronary intervention; stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31943693     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

Review 1.  Small vessel coronary artery disease: How small can we go with myocardial revascularization?

Authors:  Maciej T Wybraniec; Paweł Bańka; Tomasz Bochenek; Tomasz Roleder; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xinying Wu; Lun Li; Li He
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 3.  Drug-coated Balloons for Small Coronary Disease-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Ketina Arslani; Raban Jeger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Coated Balloon.

Authors:  Yuxuan Zhang; Xinyi Zhang; Qichao Dong; Delong Chen; Yi Xu; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  The usefulness of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography for in-stent restenosis assessment of patients with CoCr stent using 320-row area detector CT.

Authors:  Jian Li; Man-Tao Guo; Xiao Yang; Fang Gao; Na Li; Ming-Gang Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.