Literature DB >> 31943408

Public policy and programs - Missing links in growing home dialysis in the United States.

Graham Abra1,2, Brigitte Schiller1,2.   

Abstract

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) require dialysis or a kidney transplant for survival and over 760 000 patients now benefit from these therapies in the United States. Dialysis in the United States in the late 1960s and early 1970s was often done in the home. After the advent of Medicare coverage for ESKD in 1972 and the subsequent easier access to center based hemodialysis, the use of home modalities dramatically declined. This stands in contrast to home dialysis uptake in other industrialized healthcare systems where both peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis are more frequently used. Characteristics unique to the US healthcare system as well as the cultures of providers (physicians and dialysis providers) and recipients of ESKD care are hypothesized as the main reasons for observed differences in home dialysis use. To address these issues, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have recently proposed new payment programs under an Executive Order from the President of the United States, with the explicit goal of increasing the number of patients using home dialysis. This perspective outlines policy opportunities and programs with a proven track record of home dialysis growth in other countries or hypothesized promise based on identified barriers and needs.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31943408     DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  6 in total

Review 1.  Beta-2 Microglobulin Amyloidosis: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Ignacio Portales-Castillo; Jerry Yee; Hiroshi Tanaka; Andrew Z Fenves
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-10-21

2.  Intervening to eliminate the centre-effect variation in home dialysis use: protocol for Inter-CEPt-a sequential mixed-methods study designing an intervention bundle.

Authors:  Maatla Tshimologo; Kerry Allen; David Coyle; Sarah Damery; Lisa Dikomitis; James Fotheringham; Harry Hill; Mark Lambie; Louise Phillips-Darby; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Iestyn Williams; Simon J Davies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Is It Time for Precision Dialysis?

Authors:  Nupur Gupta; Jay B Wish
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  The Role of Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis in the Era of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative.

Authors:  Yuvaram N V Reddy; Mallika L Mendu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Choice of dialysis modality among patients initiating dialysis: results of the Peridialysis study.

Authors:  James Heaf; Maija Heiro; Aivars Petersons; Baiba Vernere; Johan V Povlsen; Anette Bagger Sørensen; Naomi Clyne; Inge Bumblyte; Alanta Zilinskiene; Else Randers; Niels Løkkegaard; Mai Ots-Rosenberg; Stig Kjellevold; Jan Dominik Kampmann; Björn Rogland; Inger Lagreid; Olof Heimburger; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Less Complexity in Hemodialysis Machines Reduces Time and Physical Load for Operator Actions.

Authors:  Uwe Gründler; Eva Ekesbo; Martin Löwe; Adelheid Gauly
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-11-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.