Literature DB >> 31943255

Modeling repeated labor curves in consecutive pregnancies: Individualized prediction of labor progression from previous pregnancy data.

Olive D Buhule1, Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba2, Paul S Albert2.   

Abstract

The measurement of cervical dilation of a pregnant woman is used to monitor the progression of labor until 10 cm when pushing begins. There is anecdotal evidence that labor tracks across repeated pregnancies; moreover, no statistical methodology has been developed to address this important issue, which can help obstetricians make more informed clinical decisions about an individual woman's progression. Motivated by the NICHD Consecutive Pregnancies Study (CPS), we propose new methodology for analyzing labor curves across consecutive pregnancies. Our focus is both on studying the correlation between repeated labor curves on the same woman and on using the cervical dilation data from prior pregnancies to predict subsequent labor curves. We propose a hierarchical random effects model with a random change point that characterizes repeated labor curves within and between women to address these issues. We employ Bayesian methodology for parameter estimation and prediction. Model diagnostics to examine the appropriateness of the hierarchical random effects structure for characterizing the dependence structure across consecutive pregnancies are also proposed. The methodology was used in analyzing the CPS data and in developing a predictor for labor progression that can be used in clinical practice.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chain Monte Carlo; change point; consecutive pregnancies; individualized predictions; labor curves

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31943255      PMCID: PMC7171572          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  10 in total

1.  Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis.

Authors:  E A FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The graphic analysis of labor.

Authors:  E FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1954-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A nonlinear model for highly unbalanced repeated time-to-event data: Application to labor progression.

Authors:  Srikesh G Arunajadai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Modeling longitudinal data with a random change point and no time-zero: applications to inference and prediction of the labor curve.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions.

Authors:  David Lunn; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Thomas; Nicky Best
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Minkowski-Weyl Priors for Models With Parameter Constraints: An Analysis of the BioCycle Study.

Authors:  Michelle R Danaher; Anindya Roy; Zhen Chen; Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the progress of labor in the assessment of pain.

Authors:  Jessamyn Conell-Price; Jennifer B Evans; Daewha Hong; Steven Shafer; Pamela Flood
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.108

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.