Chuan-Fen Liu1, Paul L Hebert1,2, Jamie H Douglas2, Emily L Neely2, Christine A Sulc2, Ashok Reddy2,3, Anne E Sales4,5, Edwin S Wong1,2. 1. Department of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington. 2. Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 4. Center of Innovation for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Division of Learning and Knowledge Systems, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether nurse practitioner (NP)-assigned patients exhibited differences in utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes compared to medical doctor (MD)-assigned patients. DATA SOURCES: Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data capturing characteristics, outcomes, and provider assignments of 806 434 VA patients assigned to an MD primary care provider (PCP) who left VA practice between 2010 and 2012. STUDY DESIGN: We applied a difference-in-difference approach comparing outcomes between patients reassigned to MD and NP PCPs, respectively. We examined measures of outpatient (primary care, specialty care, and mental health) and inpatient (total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations) utilization, costs (outpatient, inpatient and total), and clinical outcomes (control of hemoglobin A1c, LDL, and blood pressure) in the year following reassignment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared to MD-assigned patients, NP-assigned patients were less likely to use primary care and specialty care services and incurred fewer total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations. Differences in costs, clinical outcomes, and receipt of diagnostic tests between groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reassigned to NPs experienced similar outcomes and incurred less utilization at comparable cost relative to MD patients. NPs may offer a cost-effective approach to addressing anticipated shortages of primary care physicians. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether nurse practitioner (NP)-assigned patients exhibited differences in utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes compared to medical doctor (MD)-assigned patients. DATA SOURCES: Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data capturing characteristics, outcomes, and provider assignments of 806 434 VA patients assigned to an MD primary care provider (PCP) who left VA practice between 2010 and 2012. STUDY DESIGN: We applied a difference-in-difference approach comparing outcomes between patients reassigned to MD and NP PCPs, respectively. We examined measures of outpatient (primary care, specialty care, and mental health) and inpatient (total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations) utilization, costs (outpatient, inpatient and total), and clinical outcomes (control of hemoglobin A1c, LDL, and blood pressure) in the year following reassignment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared to MD-assigned patients, NP-assigned patients were less likely to use primary care and specialty care services and incurred fewer total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations. Differences in costs, clinical outcomes, and receipt of diagnostic tests between groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:Patients reassigned to NPs experienced similar outcomes and incurred less utilization at comparable cost relative to MD patients. NPs may offer a cost-effective approach to addressing anticipated shortages of primary care physicians. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
cost; health workforce; nurse practitioner; primary care; quality of care; utilization
Authors: Edwin S Wong; Virginia Wang; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Joseph L Goulet; Joseph Erdos; Sue Kancir; Forrest L Levin; Steven M Wright; Stanlie M Daniels; Lynnette Nilan; Amy C Justice Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Marleen H Lovink; Anke Persoon; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Anneke J A H Van Vught; Lisette Schoonhoven; Miranda G H Laurant Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: James F Burgess; Matthew L Maciejewski; Chris L Bryson; Michael Chapko; John C Fortney; Mark Perkins; Nancy D Sharp; Chuan-Fen Liu Journal: Health Econ Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Jamie H Douglas; Emily L Neely; Christine A Sulc; Ashok Reddy; Anne E Sales; Edwin S Wong Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.402