| Literature DB >> 31942563 |
Ejeh Augustine Sunday1, Patrick Azubuike Onyeyili2, Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diarrhea can be caused by pathogenic microorganisms and chemicals. In view of this, Byrsocarpus coccineus Schum and Thonn (Connaraceae) was used to treat diarrhea induced by castor oil or bacteria in Wistar albino rats.Entities:
Keywords: Bryocarpus coccineus; E. coli; antidiarrhoea; castor oil; diarrhea; extract; hematonic; rat
Year: 2019 PMID: 31942563 PMCID: PMC6930995 DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animal Model Exp Med ISSN: 2576-2095
The phytochemical constituents of an aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus
| Phytochemical constituents | Results |
|---|---|
| Flavonoids | + |
| Tannins | + |
| Saponins | + |
| Alkaloids | + |
| Phenol | + |
| Carbohydrate | + |
| Cardiac glycoside | − |
| Terpernoid/ steroid | − |
| Anthraquinone | − |
+ = presence; − = absence.
The quantitative analysis of the phytochemical content of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus
| Phytochemical | Alkaloids | Saponins | Flavonoids | Tannins | Phenols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage present (%) | 4.4 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 7.6 | 5.8 |
The effect of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on castor oil‐induced diarrhea in Wistar albino rats
| S/No. | Group | Treatment (mg/kg) | No. of defecations (6 h) | Percentage protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Control | Normal saline | 6.67 ± 1.45 | — |
| II | Diphenoxylate + CO | 5 | 2.33 ± 0.33 | 65.06 |
| III | Extract + CO | 50 | 2.00 ± 1.00 | 70.01 |
| IV | Extract + CO | 100 | 1.67 ± 0.88 | 74.96 |
| V | Extract + CO | 200 | 2.33 ± 1.45 | 65.06 |
Abbreviation: CO, castor oil.
Significant at P < .05 compared to the control. Values are presented as means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effect of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on gastrointestinal transit of charcoal in Wistar albino rats
| S/No. | Treatment group | Length of intestine (cm) | Distance travelled by charcoal (cm) | %Intestinal transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Control | 37.3 ± 2.2 | 29.0 ± 2.1 | 77.75 |
| II | Atropine (3 mg/kg) | 38.3 ± 1.3 | 14.7 ± 3.9 | 38.38 |
| III | Extract (50 mg/kg) | 40.0 ± 2.0 | 16.3 ± 2.7 | 40.75 |
| IV | Extract (100 mg/kg) | 38.7 ± 3.2 | 16.7 ± 1.5 | 43.15 |
| V | Extract (200 mg/kg) | 38.7 ± 1.5 | 20.7 ± 1.5 | 53.49 |
Significant at P < .05 compared to the control. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effect of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on castor oil‐induced enteropooling in rats
| S/No. | Treatment | Weight of full intestine (g) | Weight of empty intestine (g) | Weight of intestinal content (g) | %Inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Control + CO | 4.69 ± 0.33 | 2.52 ± 0.00 | 2.17 ± 0.67 | 12.84 |
| II | Atropine (3 mg/kg + CO | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 1.67 ± 0.33 | 36.0 |
| III | Extract (50 mg/kg) + CO | 4.00 ± 0.57 | 2.67 ± 0.67 | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 14.71 |
| IV | Extract 100 mg/kg) + CO | 4.00 ± 0.67 | 2.67 ± 0.67 | 1.67 ± 0.67 | 14.71 |
| V | Extract + CO (200 mg/kg) | 3.67 ± 0.33 | 2.33 ± 0.33 | 1.00 ± 0.58 | 21.74 |
Abbreviation: CO, castor oil.
Significant at P < .05 compared to the control. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
In vitro antimicrobial activities of higher doses of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus without control
| Extract concentration (mg/mL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 200 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3.03 ± 0.1 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 400 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
Values are means ± SEM based on 3 observations.
In vitro inhibitory effect of low doses of aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract concentration (mg/mL) | |||||
| 2.5 | 1.05 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 1.25 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 0.63 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 0.31 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 0.16 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| 0.07 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| Conc. of control (mg/mL) | |||||
| 2.5 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | |
| 1.25 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 0.63 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | |
| 0.31 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | |
| 0.16 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | |
| 0.07 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | |
Values are means ± SEM based on 3 observations.
Effect of aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on body weights of rats infected with E. coli
| S/No. | Treatment/group | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 12 | Day 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50 mg/kg | 129.11 ± 5.29 | 148.54 ± 11.77 | 158.41 ± 12.68 | 159.00 ± 12.32 |
| II | 100 mg/kg | 122.71 ± 5.27 | 147.75 ± 11.30 | 155.74 ± 10.15 | 154.19 ± 11.21 |
| III | 200 mg/kg | 125.26 ± 10.51 | 140.62 ± 5.23 | 144.16 ± 4.25 | 143.08 ± 2.89 |
| IV | 5 mg/kg (5% oxytetracydine) | 192.55 ± 9.57 | 198.31 ± 5.51 | 204.25 ± 5.72 | 205.74 ± 5.57 |
| V | Infected untreated | 114.14 ± 11.76 | 128.49 ± 10.95 | 131.52 ± 11.44 | 133.84 ± 11.02 |
| VI | Uninfected untreated | 216.03 ± 11.39 | 219.08 ± 8.36 | 221.98 ± 8.36 | 221.76 ± 7.95 |
Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effects of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on the weight of liver‐ and kidney‐to‐body weight ratio of rats infected with E. coli
| S/No. | Group | Body weight | Liver | Left kidney | Right kidney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50 mg/kg | 148.77 ± 13.95 | 0.04 + 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.004 ± 0.001 |
| II | 100 mg/kg | 145.10 ± 15.32 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.001 | 0.004 ± 0.004 |
| III | 200 mg/kg | 138.28 ± 8.81 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.004 ± 0.001 |
| IV | 5 mg/kg (5% oxytetracycline.) | 200.21 ± 6.03 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.004 ± 0.003 | 0.004 ± 0.004 |
| V | Infected untreated | 126.00 ± 8.85 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.004 ± 0.003 | 0.004 ± 0.003 |
| VI | Uninfected untreated | 219.71 ± 2.79 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.003 ± 0.003 | 0.003 ± 0.003 |
Significant at P < .05 compared to the controls. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effects of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on mean red blood cell count (× 106/mm3) of rats infected with E. coli
| S/No. | Treatment group | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50 mg/kg | 6.36 ± 0.47 | 3.42 ± 1.46 | 5.75 ± 0.32 |
| II | 100 mg/kg | 6.38 ± 0.87 | 6.57 ± 1.61 | 6.85 ± 0.29 |
| III | 200 mg/kg | 6.08 ± 0.36 | 4.65 ± 1.94 | 7.24 ± 0.29 |
| IV | 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 6.67 ± 0.32 | 5.70 ± 0.61 | 6.34 ± 0.36 |
| V | Infected not treated | 6.88 ± 0.72 | 1.70 ± 0.47 | 5.99 ± 0.44 |
| VI | Uninfected untreated | 6.09 ± 0.15 | 6.06 ± 0.14 | 4.87 ± 1.37 |
Significant at P < .05 compared to the controls. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effects of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on packed cell volume (%) of rats infected with E. coli
| S/No. | Treatment (mg/kg) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50 mg/kg | 43.53 ± 1.32 | 23.00 ± 9.75 | 32.83 ± 3.32 |
| II | 100 mg/kg | 43.49 ± 1.31 | 40.70 ± 9.56 | 35.38 ± 1.22 |
| III | 200 mg/kg | 41.93 ± 2.02 | 29.57 ± 11.86 | 41.42 ± 0.93 |
| IV | 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 46.38 ± 0.38 | 19.47 ± 4.37 | 37.50 ± 0.74 |
| V | Infected not treated | 46.52 ± 1.64 | 12.22 ± 3.11 | 34.30 ± 1.30 |
| VI | Not infected not treated | 47.68 ± 1.23 | 47.67 ± 1.21 | 47.33 ± 1.34 |
Significant at P < .05 compared to the controls. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Effects of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on white blood cells (WBC) of rats infected with E. coli
| S/No. | Treatment (mg/kg) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 50 mg/kg | 8.40 ± 0.85 | 11.05 ± 0.69 | 7.33 ± 0.89 |
| II | 100 mg/kg | 5.65 ± 097 | 10.82 ± 2.49 | 6.87 ± 1.09 |
| III | 200 mg/kg | 7.73 ± 1.56 | 10.87 ± 2.13 | 8.80 ± 0.52 |
| IV | 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 9.48 ± 0.68 | 8.70 ± 1.00 | 6.90 ± 0.74 |
| V | Infected untreated | 10.87 ± 2.15 | 8.22 ± 1.30 | 7.93 ± 1.43 |
| VI | Uninfected untreated | 6.05 ± 0.70 | 7.25 ± 1.81 | 6.53 ± 1.93 |
Values are mean ± SEM base on 5 observations
Significantly lower at P < .05 compared to the controls.
Significantly lower at P < .05 compared to infected untreated group.
Effects of the aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus on differential white blood cell counts of rats infected with E. coli
| Parameter |
Treatment groups (mg/kg) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basophils | 50 mg/kg | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| 100 mg/kg | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | |
| 200 mg/kg | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | |
| 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | |
| Infected untreated | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | |
| Uninfected untreated | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | |
| Eosinophils |
50 mg/kg |
0.44 ± 0.09 |
0.31 ± 0.06 |
0.35 ± 0.02 |
| 100 mg/kg | 0.43 ± 0.10 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | |
| 200 mg/kg | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | |
| 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | |
| Infected untreated | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.09 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | |
| Uninfected untreated | 0.37 ± 0.07 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.06 | |
| Neutrophils |
50 mg/kg |
5.44 ± 1.07 |
3.93 ± 0.57 |
3.94 ± 0.57 |
| 100 mg/kg | 5.41 ± 1.23 | 3.86 ± 0.78 | 3.44 ± 0.54 | |
| 200 mg/kg | 5.53 ± 0.35 | 1.33 ± 0.49 | 3.66 ± 0.45 | |
| 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 4.18 ± 0.70 | 4.20 ± 0.42 | 3.45 ± 0.37 | |
| Infected untreated | 4.11 ± 0.66 | 4.85 ± 0.45 | 5.96 ± 0.72 | |
| Uninfected untreated | 4.63 ± 0.90 | 3.01 ± 1.78 | 3.26 ± 0.97 | |
| Monocytes | 50 mg/kg | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.03 |
| 100 mg/kg | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | |
| 200 mg/kg | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | |
| 5 mg/kg (5% oxtetracycline) | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | |
| Infected untreated | 0.51 ± 0.12 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | |
| Uninfected untreated | 0.46 ± 0.09 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.10 |
Significant at P < .05 compared to the controls.
Significantly lower at P < .05 compared to the controls. Values are means ± SEM based on 5 observations.
Figure 1Photomicrograph of the liver of a Wistar albino rat. Uninfected untreated (A), infected untreated (B), infected and treated with 200 mg/kg of aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus (C) (H&E, ×400)
Figure 2Photomicrograph of the small intestine of a Wistar albino rat. Uninfected untreated (A), infected untreated (B), infected and treated with 100 mg/kg of aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus (C) (H&E, ×400)
Figure 3Photomicrograph of the kidney of a Wistar albino rat. Uninfected untreated (A), infected untreated (B), infected and treated with 200 mg/kg of aqueous root bark extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus (C) (H&E, ×400)