| Literature DB >> 31941934 |
Ezgi Sutcu1, Nimeti Doner2, Fengshan Liu3, Umran Ercetin1, Fatih Sen4, Jérôme Yon5, Jose Morán5,6, Andrés Fuentes6.
Abstract
The study is aimed at investigating the radiative properties of soot aggregates at determined morphological features using both experimental and numerical methods. Soot aggregates collected from air monitoring stations in different locations were examined. The locations were divided into three groups. The first group (Case 1) included the coastal and industrial zone; the second group (Case 2) consisted of small and large cities; and the third group (Case 3) included areas in the neighbourhood of thermal power plants. The absorbance measurements of the soot aggregates were conducted in the visible and near-infrared spectra, and in the wavelength range of 2 μm-20 μm. The samples were characterised by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and their radiative properties were assessed using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) for numerically generated fractal aggregates with two popular refractive indices of m = 1.60 + 0.60i and m = 1.90 + 0.75i. Calculations were conducted for primary particles in point-contact, with 20% overlapping and with a coating (50% and 80%) in the wavelength range of 0.4-1.064 μm. The largest measured absorbance values in both the winter and summer seasons were found in the cities in Case 1, and the x-ray diffraction (XRD) phases of the samples were also presented. The radiative properties of the aggregates, i.e., Df = 1.78 and kf = 2.0 representing Case 3, were close to those of aggregates with Df = 2.1 and kf = 2.35 representing Case 1 in the investigated wavelength range. The calculated radiative properties and the experimental absorbance measurements for point-contact and overlapping situations showed the same trend in the examined wavelengths. The absorbance properties of the samples of coastal and industrial zones were distinctively higher than others in the wavelength range of 2 μm-20 μm which could be attributed to the PAH effects.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31941934 PMCID: PMC6962357 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57045-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The locations of the cities where the soot samples were collected.
Figure 2The images of the collected samples.
Figure 3(a) Absorbance measurement results for Cases 1, 2, and 3 in the visible to near IR spectrum. (b) Absorbance measurement results for Cases 1, 2, and 3 at a wavelength range of 2 μm to 20 μm.
Figure 4SEM images of the samples.
Figure 5The results of EDX analysis of the samples.
Figure 6The XRD phases of samples from Case 1.
The equivalent volume radius (a) for all studied cases.
| Number of dipoles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
| Point-contact | 0.18364 | 0.15349 | 0.17406 | 353814 | 81454 | 216727 |
| 20% overlapping | 0.22037 | 0.18371 | 0.20887 | 561955 | 131592 | 342393 |
| 50% coating | 0.31884 | 0.28585 | 0.33343 | 316549 | 389278 | 418351 |
| 80% coating | 0.35745 | 0.33132 | 0.38943 | 446120 | 606320 | 667014 |
Figure 7The radiative efficiency factors of Case 1 sample.
Figure 9The radiative efficiency factors of Case 3 samples.
Figure 10The change trends of calculated and measured absorption results.