| Literature DB >> 26419204 |
Shang Liu1,2, Allison C Aiken1, Kyle Gorkowski1,3, Manvendra K Dubey1, Christopher D Cappa4, Leah R Williams5, Scott C Herndon5, Paola Massoli5, Edward C Fortner5, Puneet S Chhabra5,6, William A Brooks5, Timothy B Onasch5,7, John T Jayne5, Douglas R Worsnop5, Swarup China8, Noopur Sharma8, Claudio Mazzoleni8, Lu Xu9, Nga L Ng9,10, Dantong Liu11, James D Allan11,12, James D Lee13, Zoë L Fleming14, Claudia Mohr15,16, Peter Zotter17,18, Sönke Szidat19, André S H Prévôt17.
Abstract
Black carbon (BC) and light-absorbing organic carbon (brown carbon, BrC) play key roles in warming the atmosphere, but the magnitude of their effects remains highly uncertain. Theoretical modelling and laboratory experiments demonstrate that coatings on BC can enhance BC's light absorption, therefore many climate models simply assume enhanced BC absorption by a factor of ∼1.5. However, recent field observations show negligible absorption enhancement, implying models may overestimate BC's warming. Here we report direct evidence of substantial field-measured BC absorption enhancement, with the magnitude strongly depending on BC coating amount. Increases in BC coating result from a combination of changing sources and photochemical aging processes. When the influence of BrC is accounted for, observationally constrained model calculations of the BC absorption enhancement can be reconciled with the observations. We conclude that the influence of coatings on BC absorption should be treated as a source and regionally specific parameter in climate models.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26419204 PMCID: PMC4598716 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Variation of Eabs and particle composition as a function of RBC.
(a,b) show measured and calculated absorption enhancement values versus RBC at 405 and 781 nm, respectively. kBrC of 0.004 and 0.032 were used for modelling absorption of ambient and thermodenuded organic mass at 405 nm, respectively. (c) Particle average oxidation state versus RBC. The points are coloured by the organic mass fraction of the oxygenated organic aerosol factor, which was derived from factor analysis of the BC-associated OM. (d) Mass fraction of the non-refractory components internally mixed with BC (shaded areas) and BC core median volume-weighted diameter (open circles) as a function of RBC. The colours represent nitrate (blue), ammonium (orange), sulfate (red), chloride (purple), oxygenated organic aerosol factor (pink), solid fuel organic aerosol factor (brown) and hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol factor (grey). The error bars in (a–d) represent s.d. of the values for each RBC interval.
Figure 2Comparison of observed and modelled Eabs,MAC and Eabs,TD at 405 nm.
Mie and RDG calculations (assuming BC spherule sizes of 40 and 70 nm) were performed using a range of kBrC values that are shown in the legend. kBrC indicates the cases in which a single kBrC value was assumed for OM; kBrC,ext and kBrC,int represent the kBrC values for OM that was externally and internally mixed with BC, respectively; kBrC,amb and kBrC,TD represent the kBrC values for ambient and thermodenuded OM, respectively. The error bars in (a–f) represent s.d. of the measured absorption enhancement values for each RBC interval.
Figure 3Morphology and statistics of BC-containing particles.
(a) Representative electron microscopy images of BC-containing particles collected at the Detling site for embedded (top left), partly coated (top right), thinly coated (bottom left) and partially encapsulated and/or surface attached (bottom right) BC particle types. The size of each panel is 1 μm by 1 μm. (b) Average number fraction of particle types with the colours indicating embedded (dark green), partly coated (green), thinly coated (black) and partially encapsulated and/or surface attached (purple) BC particle types for the high- and low-Eabs-obs-TD samples at Detling during ClearfLo and at Sacramento during CARES. The ‘D' and ‘A' in the parenthesis indicate thermodenuded and ambient samples, respectively. (c) Box plot of for the high- and low-Eabs-obs-TD single particle sampling periods in Detling. (d) Box plot of area equivalent diameter of the embedded BC particles for the high-Eabs-obs-TD samples (#1 and #2 in Supplementary Table 3) and low-Eabs-obs-TD samples (#3 and #4 in Supplementary Table 3) for the Detling measurements. In the box plots (c,d), the bounds of each box represent quartiles, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points that are within 1.5 interquartile range of the box. The horizontal bars inside the boxes represent the median values.