Literature DB >> 31941434

Semi-Automated evidence synthesis in health psychology: current methods and future prospects.

Iain J Marshall1, Blair T Johnson2, Zigeng Wang3, Sanguthevar Rajasekaran3, Byron C Wallace4.   

Abstract

The evidence base in health psychology is vast and growing rapidly. These factors make it difficult (and sometimes practically impossible) to consider all available evidence when making decisions about the state of knowledge on a given phenomenon (e.g., associations of variables, effects of interventions on particular outcomes). Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other rigorous syntheses of the research mitigate this problem by providing concise, actionable summaries of knowledge in a given area of study. Yet, conducting these syntheses has grown increasingly laborious owing to the fast accumulation of new evidence; existing, manual methods for synthesis do not scale well. In this article, we discuss how semi-automation via machine learning and natural language processing methods may help researchers and practitioners to review evidence more efficiently. We outline concrete examples in health psychology, highlighting practical, open-source technologies available now. We indicate the potential of more advanced methods and discuss how to avoid the pitfalls of automated reviews.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; evidence synthesis; health psychology; natural language processing; semi-automation; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31941434      PMCID: PMC7029797          DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1716198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1743-7199


  27 in total

1.  Applications of text mining within systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; John McNaught; Sophia Ananiadou
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change.

Authors:  Emma Norris; Ailbhe N Finnerty; Janna Hastings; Gillian Stokes; Susan Michie
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-01-14

Review 3.  Behavior change interventions: the potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice.

Authors:  Kai R Larsen; Susan Michie; Eric B Hekler; Bryan Gibson; Donna Spruijt-Metz; David Ahern; Heather Cole-Lewis; Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis; Bradford Hesse; Richard P Moser; Jean Yi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-01

4.  MimoSA: a system for minimotif annotation.

Authors:  Jay Vyas; Ronald J Nowling; Thomas Meusburger; David Sargeant; Krishna Kadaveru; Michael R Gryk; Vamsi Kundeti; Sanguthevar Rajasekaran; Martin R Schiller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Living Systematic Reviews: A Novel Approach to Create a Living Evidence Base.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications.

Authors:  Svetlana Kiritchenko; Berry de Bruijn; Simona Carini; Joel Martin; Ida Sim
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.

Authors:  Iain J Marshall; Joël Kuiper; Byron C Wallace
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Barnaby C Reeves; George Wells; Micere Thuku; Candyce Hamel; Julian Moran; David Moher; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch; Elizabeth Kristjansson; David A Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-21

9.  Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.

Authors:  Iain J Marshall; Byron C Wallace
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-11

10.  ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Jelena Savović; Julian P T Higgins; Deborah M Caldwell; Barnaby C Reeves; Beverley Shea; Philippa Davies; Jos Kleijnen; Rachel Churchill
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  4 in total

1.  Understanding and predicting health behaviour change: a contemporary view through the lenses of meta-reviews.

Authors:  Karina W Davidson; Urte Scholz
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-03

2.  Perspective: Towards Automated Tracking of Content and Evidence Appraisal of Nutrition Research.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Dana Hawwash; Bernard De Baets; Jildau Bouwman; Carl Lachat
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Ensuring Prevention Science Research is Synthesis-Ready for Immediate and Lasting Scientific Impact.

Authors:  Emily A Hennessy; Rebecca L Acabchuk; Pieter A Arnold; Adam G Dunn; Yong Zhi Foo; Blair T Johnson; Sonya R Geange; Neal R Haddaway; Shinichi Nakagawa; Witness Mapanga; Kerrie Mengersen; Matthew J Page; Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar; Vivian Welch; Luke A McGuinness
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-07-21

4.  Artificial Intelligence and Behavioral Science Through the Looking Glass: Challenges for Real-World Application.

Authors:  Pol Mac Aonghusa; Susan Michie
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-12-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.