Literature DB >> 32504536

Perspective: Towards Automated Tracking of Content and Evidence Appraisal of Nutrition Research.

Chen Yang1, Dana Hawwash1, Bernard De Baets2, Jildau Bouwman3, Carl Lachat1.   

Abstract

Robust recommendations for healthy diets and nutrition require careful synthesis of available evidence. Given the increasing volume of research articles generated, the retrieval and synthesis of evidence are increasingly becoming laborious and time-consuming. Information technology could help to reduce workload for humans. To guide supervised learning however, human identification of key study characteristics is necessary. Reporting guidelines recommend that authors include essential content in articles and could generate manually labeled training data for automated evidence retrieval and synthesis. Here, we present a semiautomated approach to annotate, link, and track the content of nutrition research manuscripts. We used the STROBE extension for nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut) reporting guidelines to manually annotate a sample of 15 articles and converted the semantic information into linked data in a Neo4j graph database through an automated process. Six summary statistics were computed to estimate the reporting completeness of the articles. The content structure, presence of essential study characteristics as well as the reporting completeness of the articles are visualized automatically from the graph database. The archived linked data are interoperable through their annotations and relations. A graph database with linked data on essential study characteristics can enable Natural Language Processing in nutrition.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STROBE-nut; graph database; ontology; reporting guidelines; research semantics; standardization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32504536      PMCID: PMC7490154          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  33 in total

1.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

2.  The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas.

Authors:  Peter Bragge; Ornella Clavisi; Tari Turner; Emma Tavender; Alex Collie; Russell L Gruen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.

Authors:  Iain J Marshall; Joël Kuiper; Byron C Wallace
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Susanna Mills; Heather Brown; Wendy Wrieden; Martin White; Jean Adams
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 5.  An analysis of methods used to synthesize evidence and grade recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines.

Authors:  Phillipa Blake; Solange Durão; Celeste E Naude; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.110

6.  Comparison of individuals with low versus high consumption of home-prepared food in a group with universally high dietary quality: a cross-sectional analysis of the UK National Diet & Nutrition Survey (2008-2016).

Authors:  Chloe Clifford Astbury; Tarra L Penney; Jean Adams
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Examining the correlates of meal skipping in Australian young adults.

Authors:  Felicity J Pendergast; Katherine M Livingstone; Anthony Worsley; Sarah A McNaughton
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.