Juan D Chaparro1,2, Cory Hussain3, Jennifer A Lee3, Jessica Hehmeyer4, Manjusri Nguyen4, Jeffrey Hoffman1,2. 1. Division of Clinical Informatics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 2. Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 3. Department of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 4. Department of Information Services, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased adoption of electronic health records (EHR) with integrated clinical decision support (CDS) systems has reduced some sources of error but has led to unintended consequences including alert fatigue. The "pop-up" or interruptive alert is often employed as it requires providers to acknowledge receipt of an alert by taking an action despite the potential negative effects of workflow interruption. We noted a persistent upward trend of interruptive alerts at our institution and increasing requests for new interruptive alerts. OBJECTIVES: Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) quality improvement (QI) methodology, the primary objective was to reduce the total volume of interruptive alerts received by providers. METHODS: We created an interactive dashboard for baseline alert data and to monitor frequency and outcomes of alerts as well as to prioritize interventions. A key driver diagram was developed with a specific aim to decrease the number of interruptive alerts from a baseline of 7,250 to 4,700 per week (35%) over 6 months. Interventions focused on the following key drivers: appropriate alert display within workflow, clear alert content, alert governance and standardization, user feedback regarding overrides, and respect for user knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 25 unique alerts accounted for 90% of the total interruptive alert volume. By focusing on these 25 alerts, we reduced interruptive alerts from 7,250 to 4,400 per week. CONCLUSION: Systematic and structured improvements to interruptive alerts can lead to overall reduced interruptive alert burden. Using QI methods to prioritize our interventions allowed us to maximize our impact. Further evaluation should be done on the effects of reduced interruptive alerts on patient care outcomes, usability heuristics on cognitive burden, and direct feedback mechanisms on alert utility. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Increased adoption of electronic health records (EHR) with integrated clinical decision support (CDS) systems has reduced some sources of error but has led to unintended consequences including alert fatigue. The "pop-up" or interruptive alert is often employed as it requires providers to acknowledge receipt of an alert by taking an action despite the potential negative effects of workflow interruption. We noted a persistent upward trend of interruptive alerts at our institution and increasing requests for new interruptive alerts. OBJECTIVES: Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) quality improvement (QI) methodology, the primary objective was to reduce the total volume of interruptive alerts received by providers. METHODS: We created an interactive dashboard for baseline alert data and to monitor frequency and outcomes of alerts as well as to prioritize interventions. A key driver diagram was developed with a specific aim to decrease the number of interruptive alerts from a baseline of 7,250 to 4,700 per week (35%) over 6 months. Interventions focused on the following key drivers: appropriate alert display within workflow, clear alert content, alert governance and standardization, user feedback regarding overrides, and respect for user knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 25 unique alerts accounted for 90% of the total interruptive alert volume. By focusing on these 25 alerts, we reduced interruptive alerts from 7,250 to 4,400 per week. CONCLUSION: Systematic and structured improvements to interruptive alerts can lead to overall reduced interruptive alert burden. Using QI methods to prioritize our interventions allowed us to maximize our impact. Further evaluation should be done on the effects of reduced interruptive alerts on patient care outcomes, usability heuristics on cognitive burden, and direct feedback mechanisms on alert utility. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Shobha Phansalkar; Judy Edworthy; Elizabeth Hellier; Diane L Seger; Angela Schedlbauer; Anthony J Avery; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Allan F Simpao; Luis M Ahumada; Bimal R Desai; Christopher P Bonafide; Jorge A Gálvez; Mohamed A Rehman; Abbas F Jawad; Krisha L Palma; Eric D Shelov Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Adam Wright; Thu-Trang T Hickman; Dustin McEvoy; Skye Aaron; Angela Ai; Jan Marie Andersen; Salman Hussain; Rachel Ramoni; Julie Fiskio; Dean F Sittig; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Maxim Topaz; Diane L Seger; Kenneth Lai; Paige G Wickner; Foster Goss; Neil Dhopeshwarkar; Frank Chang; David W Bates; Li Zhou Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2015
Authors: Siru Liu; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Charlene Weir; Daniel C Malone; Thomas J Reese; Keaton Morgan; David ElHalta; Samir Abdelrahman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Juan D Chaparro; Jonathan M Beus; Adam C Dziorny; Philip A Hagedorn; Sean Hernandez; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Eric S Kirkendall; Allison B McCoy; Naveen Muthu; Evan W Orenstein Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Evan W Orenstein; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Naveen Muthu; Juan D Chaparro; Philip A Hagedorn; Adam C Dziorny; Adam Moses; Sean Hernandez; Amina Khan; Hannah B Huth; Jonathan M Beus; Eric S Kirkendall Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Adam Wright; Skye Aaron; Allison B McCoy; Robert El-Kareh; Daniel Fort; Steven Z Kassakian; Christopher A Longhurst; Sameer Malhotra; Dustin S McEvoy; Craig B Monsen; Richard Schreiber; Asli O Weitkamp; DuWayne L Willett; Dean F Sittig Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 2.342