Literature DB >> 31940596

Image-guided focused ultrasound modulates electrically evoked motor neuronal activity in the mouse peripheral nervous system in vivo.

Min Gon Kim1, Hermes A S Kamimura, Stephen A Lee, Christian Aurup, Nancy Kwon, Elisa E Konofagou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Focused ultrasound (FUS) has recently been demonstrated capable of exciting motor neuronal activity. However, comprehensive understanding of elucidated excitatory and inhibitory effects is required to better assess FUS-mediated modulation. In this study, we demonstrate that image-guided FUS can selectively modulate motor neuron activity in the mouse sciatic nerve in vivo and attribute motor responses to thermal effects. APPROACH: FUS was applied on the sciatic nerve of anesthetized mice in vivo through the intact skin and muscle using ultrasound imaging for targeting. Both excitatory and inhibitory effects were recorded using electromyography (EMG) along with muscle response of the hind limb. The effects of FUS modulation versus heating by invasive alternative heating source (AHS) on electrically evoked EMG responses in the sciatic nerve in vivo were also investigated. The safety and reversibility of the technique were validated using histology and EMG recovery. MAIN
RESULTS: The FUS was capable of eliciting motor neuronal activity comparable to electrical stimulation ES, and facilitating motor neuronal response on electrically evoked potentials with temperature elevation up to 11.5 °C  ±  0.3 °C (PRF  ⩽  40 Hz). On the other hand, FUS-induced temperature elevations above 15.1 °C  ±  1.6 °C (PRF  ⩾  100 Hz) resulted in the suppression of electrically-evoked motor neuronal activity along with a decrease in EMG latency and area under the curve (AUC), which was validated against the invasive AHS with temperature elevation of 18.1 °C  ±  8.5 °C. Histological findings along with EMG responses after FUS modulation demonstrated a reversible or irreversible modulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings reported herein indicate that image-guided FUS (PRF  ⩽  100 Hz) induces safe and controllable modulation of involuntarily evoked motor neuron activity in vivo.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31940596      PMCID: PMC7297566          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab6be6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  45 in total

1.  Reversible block of nerve conduction by ultrasound.

Authors:  R R YOUNG; E HENNEMAN
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1961-01

2.  In vitro effects of ultrasound with different energies on the conduction properties of neural tissue.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Shyh-Hau Wang; Chih-Chung Huang
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  The effect of focused ultrasound on the skin and deep nerve structures of man and animal.

Authors:  L R Gavrilov; G V Gersuni; O B Ilyinsky; M G Sirotyuk; E M Tsirulnikov; E E Shchekanov
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Unmyelinated Peripheral Nerves Can Be Stimulated in Vitro Using Pulsed Ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher J Wright; Seyyed R Haqshenas; John Rothwell; Nader Saffari
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Potential impact of thermal effects during ultrasonic neurostimulation: retrospective numerical estimation of temperature elevation in seven rodent setups.

Authors:  Charlotte Constans; Philippe Mateo; Mickaël Tanter; Jean-François Aubry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy.

Authors:  S A Sapareto; W C Dewey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Mark S George; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Selective activation of the human tibial and common peroneal nerves with a flat interface nerve electrode.

Authors:  M A Schiefer; M Freeberg; G J C Pinault; J Anderson; H Hoyen; D J Tyler; R J Triolo
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Vagus Nerve Modulation Using Focused Pulsed Ultrasound: Potential Applications and Preliminary Observations in a Rat.

Authors:  Eduardo J Juan; Rafael González; Gabriel Albors; Matthew P Ward; Pedro Irazoqui
Journal:  Int J Imaging Syst Technol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Optical control of neuronal excitation and inhibition using a single opsin protein, ChR2.

Authors:  Holly Liske; Xiang Qian; Polina Anikeeva; Karl Deisseroth; Scott Delp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Technologies for Imaging and Modulating Neural Activity.

Authors:  Claire Rabut; Sangjin Yoo; Robert C Hurt; Zhiyang Jin; Hongyi Li; Hongsun Guo; Bill Ling; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Allegra Conti; Nicola Toschi; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-26

3.  Synchronous temperature variation monitoring during ultrasound imaging and/or treatment pulse application: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Niloufar Saharkhiz; Stephen A Lee; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Open J Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-06-03

4.  Blood Pressure Modulation With Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation to the Vagus Nerve: A Pilot Animal Study.

Authors:  Ning Ji; Wan-Hua Lin; Fei Chen; Lisheng Xu; Jianping Huang; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Focused ultrasound excites action potentials in mammalian peripheral neurons in part through the mechanically gated ion channel PIEZO2.

Authors:  Benjamin U Hoffman; Yoshichika Baba; Stephen A Lee; Chi-Kun Tong; Elisa E Konofagou; Ellen A Lumpkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  The Inhibitory Thermal Effects of Focused Ultrasound on an Identified, Single Motoneuron.

Authors:  Morgan N Collins; Wynn Legon; Karen A Mesce
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Effective Ultrasonic Stimulation in Human Peripheral Nervous System.

Authors:  Thomas Riis; Jan Kubanek
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.756

8.  Ultrasound does not activate but can inhibit in vivo mammalian nerves across a wide range of parameters.

Authors:  Hongsun Guo; Sarah J Offutt; Mark Hamilton Ii; Yohan Kim; Cory D Gloeckner; Daniel P Zachs; Jamu K Alford; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Focusing in on the Future of Focused Ultrasound as a Translational Tool.

Authors:  Norman M Spivak; Joseph L Sanguinetti; Martin M Monti
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-25

10.  Neurogenic Flare Response following Image-Guided Focused Ultrasound in the Mouse Peripheral Nervous System in Vivo.

Authors:  Min Gon Kim; Hermes A S Kamimura; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.