Literature DB >> 23918148

Selective activation of the human tibial and common peroneal nerves with a flat interface nerve electrode.

M A Schiefer1, M Freeberg, G J C Pinault, J Anderson, H Hoyen, D J Tyler, R J Triolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrical stimulation has been shown effective in restoring basic lower extremity motor function in individuals with paralysis. We tested the hypothesis that a flat interface nerve electrode (FINE) placed around the human tibial or common peroneal nerve above the knee can selectively activate each of the most important muscles these nerves innervate for use in a neuroprosthesis to control ankle motion. APPROACH: During intraoperative trials involving three subjects, an eight-contact FINE was placed around the tibial and/or common peroneal nerve, proximal to the popliteal fossa. The FINE's ability to selectively recruit muscles innervated by these nerves was assessed. Data were used to estimate the potential to restore active plantarflexion or dorsiflexion while balancing inversion and eversion using a biomechanical simulation. MAIN
RESULTS: With minimal spillover to non-targets, at least three of the four targets in the tibial nerve, including two of the three muscles constituting the triceps surae, were independently and selectively recruited in all subjects. As acceptable levels of spillover increased, recruitment of the target muscles increased. Selective activation of muscles innervated by the peroneal nerve was more challenging. SIGNIFICANCE: Estimated joint moments suggest that plantarflexion sufficient for propulsion during stance phase of gait and dorsiflexion sufficient to prevent foot drop during swing can be achieved, accompanied by a small but tolerable inversion or eversion moment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918148      PMCID: PMC3809099          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  82 in total

1.  In vivo kinematics and articular surface congruency of total ankle arthroplasty during gait.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamaguchi; Yasuhito Tanaka; Scott Banks; Shinichi Kosugi; Takahisa Sasho; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Yoshinori Takakura
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Human distal sciatic nerve fascicular anatomy: implications for ankle control using nerve-cuff electrodes.

Authors:  Kenneth J Gustafson; Yanina Grinberg; Sheeba Joseph; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

3.  Center of mass acceleration feedback control for standing by functional neuromuscular stimulation: a simulation study.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Robert F Kirsch; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

4.  Restoration of gait during two to three weeks of therapy with multichannel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  U Bogataj; N Gros; M Malezic; B Kelih; M Kljajić; R Acimović
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1989-05

5.  Deaths: final data for 2008.

Authors:  Arialdi M Miniño; Sherry L Murphy; Jiaquan Xu; Kenneth D Kochanek
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2011-12-07

6.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area.

Authors:  R A Brand; D R Pedersen; J A Friederich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb.

Authors:  T L Wickiewicz; R R Roy; P L Powell; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Probabilistic modeling of selective stimulation of the human sciatic nerve with a flat interface nerve electrode.

Authors:  Matthew A Schiefer; Dustin J Tyler; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Functional walking in paralyzed patients by means of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  E B Marsolais; R Kobetic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: comparisons with other populations.

Authors:  Maxwell Boakye; Barbara C Leigh; Andrea C Skelly
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-09
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 2.  Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations.

Authors:  Elliot Greenwald; Matthew R Masters; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Restoring standing capabilities with feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Stability and selectivity of a chronic, multi-contact cuff electrode for sensory stimulation in human amputees.

Authors:  Daniel W Tan; Matthew A Schiefer; Michael W Keith; J Robert Anderson; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Microstimulation of the lumbar DRG recruits primary afferent neurons in localized regions of lower limb.

Authors:  Christopher A Ayers; Lee E Fisher; Robert A Gaunt; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Erratum to: Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations.

Authors:  Elliot Greenwald; Matthew R Masters; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  A novel flexible cuff-like microelectrode for dual purpose, acute and chronic electrical interfacing with the mouse cervical vagus nerve.

Authors:  A S Caravaca; T Tsaava; L Goldman; H Silverman; G Riggott; S S Chavan; C Bouton; K J Tracey; R Desimone; E S Boyden; H S Sohal; P S Olofsson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Recent Developments in Prosthesis Sensors, Texture Recognition, and Sensory Stimulation for Upper Limb Prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew Masteller; Sriramana Sankar; Han Biehn Kim; Keqin Ding; Xiaogang Liu; Angelo H All
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.