| Literature DB >> 31939594 |
Lízia Daniela E Silva Nascimento1, Renata Amadei Nicolau2, Antônio Luiz Martins Maia Filho3, José Zilton Lima Verde Santos4, Khetyma Moreira Fonseca5, Danniel Cabral Leão Ferreira6, Rayssilane Cardoso de Sousa7, Vicente Galber Freitas Viana8, Luiz Fernando Meneses Carvalho9, José Figueredo-Silva10.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of norbixin-based poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) membranes for Achilles tendon repair.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31939594 PMCID: PMC6958576 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020190110000001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Cir Bras ISSN: 0102-8650 Impact factor: 1.388
Figure 1Histopathological features of the tendon repair in the control (C) and membrane (M) groups on days 7, 14 and 21 (Hematoxylin & Eosin, x160). C1 - Control group (7 days): Well-developed granulation tissue with newly formed congested blood vessels (arrows) and young fibroblasts near the residual tendon (*); M1 - Membrane group (7 days): newly formed blood vessels (arrows), young fibroblasts near the preserved residual tendon (*); C2 - Control group (14 days) and M2 - Membrane group (14 days): thin fibroblasts arranged in compact bundles (arrows); C3 - Control group (21 days): very dense and hyalinized extracellular matrix (arrow); M3 - Membrane group (21 days): mature fibroblasts (smaller arrows) arranged in bundles parallel to the pre-existing tendon; granulomas (larger arrows).
Figure 2Qualitative features of control and membrane collagen fibers stained with Picrosirius Red (x10).
Intragroup analysis of the mean inflammatory cell count (mean ± standard error).
| Groups | Period (days) | IGA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 21 | p (7 vs 14) | p (7 vs 21) | p (14 vs 21) | |
| Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Membrane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IGA = intragroup analysis;
= significant difference;
ns = not significant difference
Figure 3Intergroup analysis of the mean number of inflammatory cells on day 7, 14 and 21 of the experiment.
Intragroup analysis of the fibroblast count (mean and ± standard error) on day 7, 14, and 21 of the experiment.
| Groups | Period (days) | IGA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 21 | p (7 vs 14) | p (7 vs 21) | p (14 vs 21) | |
| Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Membrane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IGA = intragroup analysis;
= significant difference;
ns = not a significant difference
Figure 4Intergroup analysis of the mean number of fibroblasts on days 7, 14, and 21 of tendon repair in rats comparing control and membrane groups.
Intragroup analysis of type I and type III collagen count (mean and ± standard error) on day 7, 14 and 21 of the experiment.
| Groups / TC (%) | Period (days) | IGA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 21 | p (7 vs 14) | p (7 vs 21) | p (14 vs 21) | ||
| Control | CTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CTIII |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Membrane | CTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CTIII |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TC = types of collagen; CTI = collagen type I; CTIII = collagen type III; IGA = intragroup analysis;
= significant difference (p < 0.05);
ns = not a significant difference'
Figure 5Intergroup analysis (mean ± standard error) of type I and type III collagen deposition on days 7, 14, and 21 of tendon repair in rats comparing control and membrane groups.